From: Gretchen Miller <grm+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 18:27:26 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: H-Costume Digest, Volume 332, 6/30/95

The Historic Costume List Digest, Volume 332, June 30, 1995

Send items for the list to h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu (or reply to this message).

Send subscription/deletion requests and inquiries to
h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Enjoy!

------------------------------
Topics:
How to get the archives
Costumes in Braveheart
The Secret of Scotland
Question and Answer: Identifying WWII German officer's hat
Elizabethan Interests update
ISO: 1800s coachman's cloak
Question and answer: Closures for 18th C ball gown
Costume museum in Spain

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 09:49:15 -0500 (CDT)
From: Teresa Shannon <tws@csd.uwm.edu>

Would someone please instruct me in very precise terms using very small
words, as to how I can access old files?  I brought up the TOPICS and
have tried seven different ways to get those files:

h-costume get hcos.950221@lunch.engr.sgi.com
get hcos.950221
get 'hcos.950221'
get "hcos.950221"
h-costume-hcos.950221@lunch.engr.sgi.com
h-costume-get hcos.950221@lunch.engr.sgi.com
I forgot the seventh try, anyway, nothing worked, the manager wasn't
informative enough for me.

Please give me an example, sorry to waste everyones time.  Teresa

------------------------------
From: close@lunch.engr.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: Re: getting specific files
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 09:50:58 -0700 (PDT)

> Would someone please instruct me in very precise terms using very small 
> words, as to how I can access old files?  I brought up the TOPICS and 
> have tried seven different ways to get those files:
> 
> h-costume get hcos.950221@lunch.engr.sgi.com
> get hcos.950221
> get 'hcos.950221'
> get "hcos.950221"
> h-costume-hcos.950221@lunch.engr.sgi.com
> h-costume-get hcos.950221@lunch.engr.sgi.com

Send the commands:

    get h-costume hcos.950221

as the body of a message to the server:

    majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com

and the server will send you back the specific file hcos.950221.

In order to successfully send you a file, the Majordomo server needs to
know the answers to the following questions:  what do you want to do?
("get"); where do you want to "get" stuff from? (h-costume); and what do
you want to get?  (hcos.950221).  Therefore, what you need in your
command line, and the order you need it in, is:

   get name-of-list name-of-file

So you need the "get" command, the name of the list (h-costume), and the
specific name of the file (like TOPICS or hcos.950221 or whatever.) 
-- 
Diane Close
   close@lunch.engr.sgi.com
   I'm at lunch all day. :-)

------------------------------
From: ccary@tiara.wpd.sgi.com (Christina Cary)
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:52:54 -0700
Subject: COSTUME: Braveheart

Hi Costumers,

I saw Braveheart, starring Mel Gibson, on Saturday night. Entertaining
but very gory film--lots of decapitation, torture, dismemberment, throat
slashing, eye gouging, stabbing, etc. Eeek.

Anyway, I am interested in educated opinion on the costumes worn in the
film. It starts in 1280 and ends (via voiceover) in 1314. It is set in
Scotland, with some scenes set in England. They do talk about clans, and
wear tartans, although they were often so grubby that I couldn't tell
one from another. And was it customary for soldiers of the time to paint
their faces in blue stripes for battle, as William Wallace (Gibson) and
his compatriots did?

Regarding the women's costumes, there are only 3 women's roles in the
film. One heroine wears grubby stuff. Princess Isabella (Princess of
Wales, daughter of the King of France) and her lady in waiting wear some
nice things. I was curious about their correctness, however. For one,
the bridal gown is ivory and gold. I thought that white/ivory bridal
gowns weren't popular until Queen Victoria, who married about 1840 or
so. Was white/ivory also worn before that, or was this done to cue
modern audiences that she was the bride in the scene?

Also, a couple of Isabella's dresses were made of what appeared to be
panne crushed velvet, and darned if they didn't cling like they were
made of Lycra! One was also in a deep raspberry pink. (I won't comment
on the lipstick, eye shadow, eyeliner, and mascara.) Any comments on
fabrics or colors of this period? She looked lovely, but was it
authentic 13th century?

Apologies if this has already been covered. Oh, by the way--judging from
this film, nothing comes between a Scotsman and his kilt. Nothing.

Thanks!

Christina

-- 
First name: Christina 
Last name:  Cary
E-mail address: ccary@tiara.wpd.sgi.com 
_____________________________________________________________

------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 95 20:18:57 PDT
From: aterry@Teknowledge.COM (Allan Terry)
Subject: Scostmen and kilts

Well, last time I asked a Scottish reenactor what Scotsmen wear under
their kilts, he invited me to come up tp his place and find out. 
However, there were problems with this research method, so I guess I'll
never know. . . .

Fran Grimble

------------------------------
From: Susan Carroll-Clark <sclark@epas.utoronto.ca>
Subject: re:  costume in Braveheart
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 23:54:09 -0400 (EDT)

Hi all...
 Delurking. This is the period I study.  I cannot speak for the Scottish
 clothing, but I will add a couple of comments on the womens' dress.  It
looks as if the costume research was not terribly bad on  this one--at
least for the most part I could understand what  they were _trying_ to
do, despite the clinging lycra-ish velvet.  The basic styles were OK,
though I would have expected to see  more surcotes (simple sleeveless
ones--not quite the full sideless]  of a few decades later).  The
headgear was quite good--I've seen  the style with the wimple and
"princess Leia" earpieces in monumental
 brasses, though from a slightly later period.  The male  English styles
were also fairly good--once again, no surcotes, though.  Colour-wise for
the class these pieces were meant for I saw few  real problems. 
Mulberry pink is actually a fairly easy colour to  obtain, though
usually it's more of a wine colour. Pastel pink is  possible, but
doesn't seem to be common during this period.  The  one unforgivable
sin, IMHO, was the use of obvious synthetic crushed  velvets which had
that unmistakable lycra drape.  I kept thinking  of my velvet leggings,
which are made of the same stuff.  Ugh.

 Not bad for Hollywood, 'tho.

 Cheers!
 Susan Carroll-Clark
 sclark@epas.utoronto.ca
 
------------------------------
From: PM035@lampeter.ac.uk
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 13:21:28 +0100 (BST)
Subject: WW2 German Army Officers Visor Cap.

The grandfather of a friend shot a german officer in WW2, taking his
armband and cap. Trying to identify cap, but no luck.
Details
I have consulted B.L Davis ' German Army Uniforms and insignia 1933-45'
but cannot positively identify it. Seems to be standard Army- in terms
of shape and colour. Has red piping, silver wreath cockcade has instead
of the colours of the german flag, a small swastika in the centre of
what seems to be a cog wheel. The eagle is a yellow/ bronze colour, so
differs from standard silver eagle. The twisted silver braid cap cord is
missing but the buttons that would secure it are of an enamel type.
These seem to be the notable differences in respect to a standard army
officers cap.  Any ideas as to value- I would guess about 350- 500
pounds?
Thanks,
 N.J.Smith.

------------------------------
From: acacia@iccu6.ipswichcity.qld.gov.au (Christina d'Aquino)
Subject: Re: COSTUME: Braveheart
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 00:11:23

Hi - Also delurking 

Saw Braveheart - Loved the film. The dresses on the women are too awful.

The cut is OK for the Coathardies but the lycra velvet no way - velvet
was not in the 1300 for which the film is set and I would have also
expected some surcoats or maybe later period cyclas.

The head gear on the other hand was wonderful - wimple etc are strait
off some of the brass rubbings, etc from the period - though more around
the very early 1400's.

The pale pink may also be period - definately illuminations of the early
1400 show women in pale pink dresses. i.e Christine de Pisan L'Epistre
d'Othea - Hunting for Deer - French c1400 definately show men and women
in pink and red dress.

I did hear some where (can't remember now) of a poem (or something
similar from the period) which told of how to get pink from a plant
growing in a circle of oak trees at a particular time of year. How in
england they followed the instructions to the letter and were able to
get a particular shade of pink. Seems at that time of the year a
chemical reaction triggered by the oak trees causes that pigment to be
producted - Strange!

Don't know about anyone else but I am going back to see the movie and
look closer at the headwear ( and do my best not to look at the dresses)

Bye for Now

Acacia Navarre
(Engage Lurk Mode)

------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 13:36:10 -0500 (CDT)
From: Deb <BADDORF@badorf.fnal.gov>
Subject: RE: Scostmen and kilts

>Well, last time I asked a Scottish reenactor what Scotsmen wear under their
>kilts, he invited me to come up tp his place and find out.  However, there
>were problems with this research method, so I guess I'll never know. . . .

*I've*  been told that you really don't want to ASK a Scotsman this
question -- as he will grab your hand and make you feel for yourself.

On the other hand,  a newly kilted Scotsman in my RevWar group had his
first experience with "dying in battle" in a kilt this past weekend.  He
was accustomed to falling to the ground with abandon -- and mortally
embarassed himself by exposing himself to his neighbors.   (Since it was
his first day in a kilt, he WAS wearing shorts, but I expect the word
"embarassed"  is particularly appropriate, if you take it apart by
syllables!)

Deb Baddorf

------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 95 12:44:10 PDT
From: "SNORTON.US.ORACLE.COM" <SNORTON@us.oracle.com>
Subject: Identity German Officer's Visor Cap

Call Christie's or Sotheyby's in NY.  Both (especially Christie's) have
military experts on staff and may be able to identify the cap from a
photo.  Both of these auction houses have regular auctions of military
items.  They could tell you the most recent selling price for a cap of
that type. 
 
 
Sally Norton 
snorton@US.oracle.com

------------------------------
From: MarieD0108@aol.com
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 22:28:20 -0400
Subject: Elizabethan Interests - Update

Wow!  I would never have guessed there were so many people out there
interested in the Elizabethan period.

Unfortunately, my online service is not particularly friendly towards
large mailings (it chokes) and that makes it difficult to shear off from
the main list.

So, lets just talk for everyone to enjoy, and see what happens.  I still
have everyone's email addresses, so I will continue to try and find a
way to make it happen.

Marie

------------------------------
From: Edward Wright <edwright@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 95 10:51:11 TZ
Subject: Re: COSTUME: Braveheart

| The cut is OK for the Coathardies but the lycra velvet no way - 
velvet was not
| in the 1300

Do you mean was not in Scotland by 1300?  Velvet was probably invented
during the 12th Century -- 13th Century at the very latest.  By 1247,
Florence had a guild established for velvet weavers.  St. Paul's in
London had velvet chausubles in its inventory by 1295.

 
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 15:17:48 -0500 (EST)
From: andrea ruth leed <aleed@indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: COSTUME: Braveheart

Velvet, yes--crushed lycra velvet, no. the closest thing modern fabric
stores have to period velvet is cotton velvet.  Go to Jo-Ann's sometime,
and compare cotton velvet and crushed lycra velvet.  The difference is
unpleasantly obvious.

On Wed, 28 Jun 1995, Edward Wright wrote:

> 
> Do you mean was not in Scotland by 1300?  Velvet was probably invented 
> during the 12th Century -- 13th Century at the very latest.  By 1247, 
> Florence had a guild established for velvet weavers.  St. Paul's in 
> London had velvet chausubles in its inventory by 1295.
> 

=============================
aleed@ezmail.ucs.indiana.edu

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 17:55:24 -0700
From: jdhester@ix.netcom.com (JOSEPH HESTER )
Subject: coachman's cloak

To whom it may concern:

    I am interested in finding a 1800's style "coachman's cloak" (ie
reproduction).  If you have any information on such an item, please
respond to me at:  jdhester@ix.netcom.com 
Thank you for your time.

                                Sincerely,
                                Joseph Hester

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 19:13:35 -0700
From: fishcat@hooked.net (Trystan L. Bass)
Subject: 18th c. dress fastener

Greetings all---

I'm making an 18th century ball gown & using the Pegree of Williamsburg
1776 dress pattern (it seems to work for me ; - ) .  It's for a
historical fantasy event in November.

I'm changing the pattern so the closure is in the back instead of the
front/stomarcher side.  I did this w/this pattern once before & used
hook & eye tape up the center back, but I'm not sure I want to do that
again. Instead, I want some kind of lacing (primarily so it has a little
more flexibility in fit).

Now, my question is, how should I do the lacing?  I could make little
loops out of cording & run the laces thru these loops (w/a big placket
behind it).  Or I could use grommets -- this would give a more snug fit
& smoother look, which I prefer.  But metal grommets down the back of
this (hopefully) lovely gown would look ugly.  So what do I do?  What
else can I use to reinforce the lacing holes, that is moderatly
historically accurate and is not  _too_  difficult for a proficient
beginner seamstress?

I'm not anal about historical authenticity, so sources & citations
aren't necy.  I just want something that looks kinda right with the
costume & that is not insanely difficult for me to do!

Thanks so much!!!
---Trystan    (aka Constanza . . . )

 fishcat@hooked.net      @->->-- Trystan L. Bass --<-<-@     TrystBass@aol.com
                                        http://www.hooked.net/users/fishcat/

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 95 18:07 WET
From: bach@lava.net (Terry A. Bach)
Subject: costume museums in Spain

This message is for the person who was looking for Costume Muesums in
Spain.  Sorry, I tried to reply that day, but my computer was being a
bad boy. Anyway, I lived in Madrid from 91-94, and the only costume
stuff there is a small side part of the Palicio Real.  They have coats
of armor, and some 
existing textile stuff.  There is a great Museo de Textils in Barcelona.
 It is in the Gothic Quarter, very close to the Picasso Museum, just
down the street.  It has a good collection of authentic garments from 
the 18th Century to Present.  I would highly reccomend it.  Please
E-Mail me privately and I'll tell you how to get to the small textile
area of Madrid, if you are interested.  Buena suerte!
Laura Bach

------------------------------
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 10:45:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: Deb <BADDORF@badorf.fnal.gov>
Subject: RE: 18th c. dress fastener

>Now, my question is, how should I do the lacing?  I could make 
>little loops
>out of cording & run the laces thru these loops (w/a big placket 
>behind
>it).  Or I could use grommets -- this would give a more snug fit & 
>smoother

I think loops would not allow for a very tight closure - they strike me
as a very bad choice (but, suit yourself!) Grommets are indeed wrong for
the period - metal grommets weren't around.  The correct closure 
(besides the fact that dresses DIDN'T close in the back)  would be to
punch holes with an awl and sew around them, turning them into round
button holes (through which you put your 
lacing).   You could also make 1/4" buttonholes in the regular, straight
slot manner.   Not especially correct, but you said you didn't care. 
Make them horizontally, not vertically, if you use this method.

  Since you don't care,  a really easy choice  (dead wrong, but easy,
and might look ok)  would be to buy the hook&eye tape like you used last
time.  Buy twice as much.  Sew the EYE tape on both sides, and put your
lacing through THAT.  Throw away the hooks.  This would have less give
than your loop suggestion, so it would be capable of a snug closure.  
Not sure I would LIKE it, but it's easy.

What's wrong with the original closure up the front or side of the
stomacher?  The stomacher could be laced up the center  with a bit more
historical correctness than the back closure   (though stomachers, being
decorative, were usually closed with hooks).

Anyway,  there's a few random suggestions!
Deb Baddorf        baddorf@fnal.gov

------------------------------ End of Volume 332 -----------------------


