From: Gretchen Miller <grm+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 18:47:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: H-Costume Digest, Volume 342, 7/13/95

The Historic Costume List Digest, Volume 342, July 13, 1995

Send items for the list to h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu (or reply to this message).

Send subscription/deletion requests and inquiries to
h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Enjoy!

------------------------------
Topics:
Which side the buttonholes go on
Elizabethan hairstyle comments
ISO: Info on quilting books
Different hairstyles, different cultures (Russian hairstyles)
ISO: Info on hairstyle in the Unicorn tapestries
ISO: Contact info for Victoria and Albert museum
Undying red linen
Handwoven Lithuanian fabrics maker
San Jose Historic Museum Tours
ISO: NY number for wool crepe and flannel
What Diane did on her sabbatical
Undigestifer available

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mrs C S Yeldham <csy20688@ggr.co.uk>
Date: 12 Jul 95 09:01:00 BST
Subject: Buttonholes

A reference found in 'Costume' No 29, the publication of the Costume Society:

"'Buttonholes: Some differences in Gender-related Front Closures' by
Judith Lopez, in 'Dress', vol 20 (1993), pp 74-78 illus.

The author has searched fashion illustrations from 1860 to 1920 to
determine when the change from left over right to right over left
fastenings for women occurred and presents tables for both men and
women."

That's all I know about the article, but it makes it clear that the
change is 19th century.  It has previously been suggested on the list
that earlier closures were random for men and women.  In either case it
is unlikely the choice of closures would be made for the convenience of
servants - why on earth should their convenience be considered?  BTW
this argument assumes women had servants when men didn't - men had just
as many body servants (valets, grooms of the chamber, attendants) as
women in the social classes that employed servants.

Caroline

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 95 10:00:12 BST
From: Alan Braggins <armb@setanta.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: H-Costume Digest, Volume 336, 7/11/95

> 
> That is one of my pet peeves.  I have been in the SCA for 15  years and
> as a 16th cent Elizabethan noble woman, my hair is always up in a coif
> or escoffion.  I have tried for years to persuade others that a) wearing
> your hair up is the more period way to wear it, and b) at camping events
> it stays much cleaner and neater that way. 

Well, you could try telling the men that any woman with her hair down in
character is advertising herself as sexually available, and see how long
it takes the women to react...

------------------------------
From: lmahood@casde.com
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 95 13:29:29 EST
Subject: info request

     Hello,  my friend is on this list so I thought I'ld ask for some
help.  My mother is a quilter and I'm looking for two books to give her
as a present.

1.  Author Florence Montgomery, "Printed Textiles: English and American
Cottons and Linens 1750-1850", New York, Viking Press, 1970.

2.  Author Herbert Ridgway Collins, "Threads of History: Americana
Recorded on Cloth 1775 to Present", Smithsonian Institution, Washington,
DC, 1979.

I'm not on the list, so please mail me directly!!!!

Thanks   
          Lisa Mahood
          LMAHOOD@CASDE.COM
          

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 09:13:52 -0400
From: eliz@world.std.com (Elizabeth Lear)
Subject: more on covering the hair

Just to add another perspective: my SCA persona is Russian.  Married
women covered their hair, unmarried didn't.  That made it easy for me
and my shoulder-length hair when I was married, and no one knew it
wasn't wonderfully long underneath.  But what do I do now that I'm
single?  My answer is I'm looking for wigs and wig pieces that will let
me achieve the correct long braids and uncovered head for my persona. 
I've collected a lot of catalogs in this search.  I'm also figuring out
how to make kokoshniks (a form of open crown hat) for my festive attire,
but I still need braids.  In the meantime, I'm still sometimes wearing
my "married" headgear.  (Don't tell me to grow my own hair out - I've
been trying for years.)

You might remember that uncovered hair doesn't necessarily mean the
person isn't paying attention to what they should be doing in persona
(though of course sometimes it *does*).  It may simply mean they're from
a different culture.  I think this harkens back to the conversation we
were having a couple of months ago about when, where and why women
covered their hair.

Of course, if someone has their hair down and loose with Tudor garb, all
best are off.

      ...eliz
      (Yelizaveta Medvedeva)

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 10:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Arlys Evans <afevans@emory.edu>
Subject: hairstyles

Several years ago I wrote a research paper on the Cluny's Lady and the
Unicorn tapestry.  In several of the tableaux the lady's hairstyle
contained an aigrette of her own hair.  This is very unusual for the
period.  The only other image that I have seen of a similar hairstyle
was an Italian block print.  I do not remember any reference associated
with the image.  Does anyone know of sources or have any information on
this type of hairstyle?  Thank you for any help you may be able to give.

Arlys Evans
afevans@emory.edu

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 08:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Heather Rose Jones <hrjones@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: more on covering the hair

On Wed, 12 Jul 1995, Elizabeth Lear wrote:

> Just to add another perspective: my SCA persona is Russian.  Married
> women covered their hair, unmarried didn't.  That made it easy for me
> and my shoulder-length hair when I was married, and no one knew it
> wasn't wonderfully long underneath.  But what do I do now that I'm
> single?

Um ... look into how widows wore their hair? (I imagine social
conventions for divorcee's hairstyles were not a major consideration of
medieval Russia.) Seriously, would an older, unmarried woman have still
worn uncovered hair or was there some point at which a "young unmarried
woman's" hairstyle would have been considered no longer appropriate in
any case?

Heather Rose Jones

------------------------------
From: ccuccherini@casde.com
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 95 08:51:27 EST
Subject: Need the Address for the V&A Museum

     Good Morning.  A friend and I are looking for the address and if
possible the phone number of the Victoria and Albert Museum  Can anyone
help?
     
     I will be going out of town tomorrow for a long weekend so if the
answer could be emailed privately back to my friend it would be greatly
appreciated. She is not a member of the list - yet. I am working on her.
:-) That address is:  lmahood@casde.com
     
     Thank you very much for any help you can provide.
     
     Respectfully,
     Carolyn A. Cuccherini
     ccuccherini@casde.com
     Alexandria, VA., U.S.A.  

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:45:10 -0400
From: eliz@world.std.com (Elizabeth Lear)
Subject: Re: more on covering the hair

<> = me
< = Heather Rose Jones

<> Just to add another perspective: my SCA persona is Russian.  Married
<> women covered their hair, unmarried didn't.  That made it easy for me
<> and my shoulder-length hair when I was married, and no one knew it
<> wasn't wonderfully long underneath.  But what do I do now that I'm
<> single?

<Um ... look into how widows wore their hair? (I imagine social 
<conventions for divorcee's hairstyles were not a major consideration of 
<medieval Russia.) 

There's a good idea ...  I suspect it remains the same as 'married', but
I'll look into it.  But it's going to depend on what I want my persona
to be.

<Seriously, would an older, unmarried woman have still 
<worn uncovered hair or was there some point at which a "young unmarried 
<woman's" hairstyle would have been considered no longer appropriate in 
<any case?

I'm going to have to do more reading, but my impression is that it's
more a 'deciding never to marry' or becoming an 'old maid' thing than an
age thing.  Perhaps a combination - maiden's braids with the top of the
head covered.  The unbraiding of the bride's hair and changing to the
style of a married woman is a big part of the marriage ceremony.

At my age (29), I'm an older woman by Medieval Russian standards.  But
I'm still relatively young by modern ones.  Where does the line come in?
 Which life expectancy do we use?

My persona is changing - I'm losing the 'wife of a Silk Road merchant'
and using 'daughter' instead.  My persona will never have been married. 
I feel young, I look relatively young (not having lived
the actual Russian life), and I like the style, so I'll probably go for
the maiden look.

       ...eliz

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 95 09:56:45 PST
From: "Gail DeCamp" <decampg@smtplink.NGC.COM>
Subject: Re: Red Linnen

     
Chantal,

I know two techniques you can try to de-red your fabric. 

To fade the red without overdyeing it, try washing the red linen this way:

Fill your washing machine with hot water. Add two or three cups of salt
and a normal dose of whatever detergent you usually use. Mix thoroughly.
(If you don't mix thoroughly, you may end up with streaks in the
fabric.) Add your fabric. Close the lid of the washer and let it wash
the fabric (hot wash, hot rinse if you can). Dry as normal.

For added bleaching effect, lay the fabric out in the sun for a few
days. Caution: Make sure it gets even exposure to the sun, or you will
have light and dark patches on it.

To mute the red with a darker color, wash it once first (so you get rid
of any extra dye that is there). Then make a few gallons of strong tea
in a big pot. Boil the fabric in the tea. I'd boil it for a half hour.
When you are done, wring it out and dry it in the dryer.

Rit also sells a "jeans fade" product you might try.

Gail DeCamp
decampg@smtplink.ngc.com

______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Red Linnen
Author:  cpecourt@mhv.net at SMTPLINK
Date:    7/11/95 9:05 PM

Hello
 I hav esome red linnen (sp? *blush*) that I got so cheap that it 
would have been a crime to pass it up, even if it is BRIGHT red. Anyone 
know of a way to mute its tone?? I cannot wear a dress that red to an sca 
event..no no no :-)
     
Thanks
Chantal

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 10:05:51 -0800 (PST)
From: PATSY DUNHAM <DUNHAM%EUGLIB@MRED.LANE.EDU>
Subject: Lithuanian hand-weaver

Hi H-Costume,

I'm getting the digest these days, so hope this is not a dup.  Original
address did not indicate cc to here, and I think there are probably
readers who would be interested, so...   (I can't _stand_ it!, see 2d
para. below!)

Chimene/Patsy
--------------------------FORWARDED MESSAGE-----------------------------
>To: sca@mc.lcs.mit.edu
>Date: 11 Jul 1995 23:50:51 GMT
>From: Christina Cary <ccary@tiara.wpd.sgi.com>
>Subject: Baltic Fabric-sell?
                                                                 
I recently returned from a trip to Lithuania. While I was there, I met a
spry 76-year-old woman who still does the traditional weaving on a
wooden loom. She weaves various types of fabric that is used for the
traditional Lithuania costume, from heavy skirt fabric to lighter white
linen jacquard blouse fabric. 

There is shrinking interest in the native fabrics as the country modernizes, so
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^AAAARRGGHHH!! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

she finds herself with a stockpile of fabric and a smaller market to sell to.

I was wondering if you-all had any ideas on who might be interested in
buying her fabric (she can also weave to order). Are there any Baltic
dance groups or SCA members who dress up as Lithuanians? (It's a
longshot... thought I'd ask!)

The fabric is authentic, and all natural fibers, I believe (except for
some shiny accents in the belts that seemed to be rayon).

I'm sorry, I don't have any idea what it would cost. The skirt fabric
looks to be 45" wide or maybe more, The blouse fabric is also wide. The
belts are about 4" wide.

Any ideas or suggestions?

Thank you!
Christina

------------------------------
From: QuiltMag@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 13:52:55 -0400
Subject: Re: Red Linnen

To "dull" any color, use a bottle of TAN Rit Dye. For new fabric, such
as linen, just throw fabric into the washing machine, use hot water, and
add the dye when the tub is full and the wash agitation is starting. let
go through both wash cycle with dye and then rinse cycle as normal.
Works wonderfully!

------------------------------
From: DCROSS@bentley.edu
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 14:17:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: more on covering the hair

> 
> Of course, if someone has their hair down and loose with Tudor garb,
> all best are off.
> 
>       ...eliz
>       (Yelizaveta Medvedeva)
Unless she's Elizabeth I in her coronation robes!
-Denise
(Elayne Courtenay) 

------------------------------
From: close@lunch.engr.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: San Jose Historic Museum Tours
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 13:39:17 -0700 (PDT)

By now everyone has probably figured out that I'm back from sabbatical!
:-)  I had a great time, mostly just lazing around home, sewing or
visiting local sites.

One trip I can highly recommend for those historic costumers visiting
San Jose (or San Francisco if you don't mind a bit of a drive) is the
San Jose Historical Museum.  It's actually a recreated town (a couple
blocks) consisting of 26 rebuilt turn-of-the-century Victorian buildings
(houses and businesses) on 25 acres, located on Senter Road in San Jose.
It's located beside the Happy Hollow Park and Zoo (mainly for kids, but
has some interesting exhibits of interest to curious adults too) and the
Japanese Park (free admission and wonderfully peaceful during the week;
gorgeous at any time.)

The Historical Museum costs $6 for a three hour tour, and it's a _very_
extensive tour, indeed!  The era of the park is 1890 to 1910, with some
1920's and 1930's decorated houses too.  A couple of the houses were
donated complete with original furniture (of the last occupants), which
is why there are a few with interiors from the later 20's and 30's era.

The best part for costume lovers is the Museum's extensive costume shop
-- in addition to renting clothing and selling hats and other
accessories, they carry Past Patterns, Old World Enterprises and several
other recreation companies' stuff!  The store is located in the small
costume museum-house in the park, and the small costume displays are
quite nice too.  All the staff and tour guides dress in reproduction
dress (of varying accuracy) too.

A tour here should get the old clothing reproduction juices going!  It
certainly jump-started mine! :-)
-- 
Diane Close
   close@lunch.engr.sgi.com
   I'm at lunch all day. :-)

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 13:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kelly Keith <kkeith@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Fabric Source

Last Fall or Winter someone posted a internet/mailorder source in NYC
for wool crepe and wool flannel.  I got the phone number and ordered a
sample pack.  They were great!  Unfortunately I lost the sample pack
and--consequently--the name and phone number of the company.  Does this
outfit sound familiar to anyone out there, and if so, can you supply me
with a name, address, or phone number.  (it was an 800 number, so it's
not like I could just look it up on my phone bill.)

Kelly Keith

------------------------------
From: close@lunch.engr.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: What I did on my spring vacation... :-)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT)

I did a lot of sewing over my holiday, and one of the things I made was
a historic-inspired piece of "wearable art".  If you have web access,
you can check it out:

   http://reality.sgi.com/employees/pdc/gallery.html

The featured piece is a vest I created from a pair of cotton boxer
shorts (boys, size large).  Though not exclusively historic costume, the
vest features a historic costume theme, so I thought I'd go ahead and
post about it here.  One of the women on my wearable art clothing
mailing list has termed it my "Great Gatsby" vest. :-)

Normally I don't buy boxer shorts, but these had a cool "groups of
1930's type people standing around at a party drinking" scene on one
leg, and a "1930's grand piano and restaurant" scene on the other leg. 
I was horrified when the shorts shrunk up to nothing when I washed them,
and determined to find something to do with the material rather than
return them to the store.  So I came up with the idea of turning them
into a vest.

The original shorts had "roman columns" extending into a solid
light-grey ceiling that formed waistband, and the scenes mentioned
above, one per leg.  I carefully opened up each and every seam, but
found that the fly front hacked into the scenes in a couple bad places. 
That's where I ended up doing most of my matching and piecing.

In the pictures, on the right front, beside the dark-haired man with his
hand in his pocket, you can see the head of a blond woman.  That's all
that was left of the scene, to the right, after the fly was removed: 
just his body and her head.  So I pieced and appliqued in a gown for
her, some matching dark grey fabric for the "fake building" background,
and painted on the white fence to match the other side.  I also gave
both "side" women matching fans, to cover stitch-removal holes leftover
from the fly.

The black and white tile didn't extend down far enough, on either side,
to form vest points, so I bought some similar, but smaller, black and
white squares material and used it en pointe.  I cut the light grey
ceiling off mid-way through the column extensions and used a Hoffman
stars print to make it look like they were partying under the open sky. 
I duplicated the Hoffman's stars in the existing boxer-short sky by
using gold glitter, and gold and copper fabric paints to create the
perfect, matching stars. I added a irridescent-covered-yellow moon to
the left front, wrapping it around the column to make it appear part of
the scene.

The original colour choices for the gowns were horrible and boring, as
were the men's jacket lapels, so I fabric- and glitter-painted in new
designs and colours, trying to be as true to the era as today's fabric
paints would allow.  I used coloured and irridescent paint to highlight
the drinks in the glasses, pieced in the restaurant scene from the edge
of the one leg, to cover up more fly-removal missing pieces, and added
dollar-sign buttons to finish.  Voila!  C'est fini! :-)

For those of you who check out the finished vest on my husband's web
page, you'll also see a (somewhat fuzzy, sorry) photo of my "wearable"
(as opposed to "historic) Armistic Blouse (Folkwear 210). In an attempt
to be true to the feel of the era, I used two 100% cotton prints
featuring a 1920's theme:  a teal background printed with purple, blue
and red women-dressed-in-1920's-and-1930's-clothing for the main blouse
pieces and a blue and purple (on a red background) "Laurel and Hardy"
print for the collar, inset and cuffs.  It's quite bright in
"real life", and I just love it!

If you are thinking of making up the pattern, here's my experiences with
it up as a modern, wearable garment:  the original pattern is very
narrow and quite short.  Since it's a fairly straight-forward blouse
pattern though, it's fairly easy to modify it.  I widened the back and
front to fit more loosely and lengthened it to jeans-tuck-in level
(which meant adding about 12 inches).  I skipped the waist tie, since I
wanted a longer, more modern garment.

The pattern instructions are very generous with the fabric estimates, so
if you make it up as they originally planned, you can expect a good
amount of leftover.  Their sleeves are very narrow too, which I didn't
mind as they fit me perfectly.  Since I didn't want a long-sleeved,
wide-cuffed blouse, I shortened my sleeves to 3/4 sleeves and drafted up
a simple narrow cuff to finish them.

The collar is _very_ wide.  I made mine, which doesn't have lace, to the
"pre-adding the lace" width, so it would be narrower and more
flattering. The instructions aren't very efficient about attaching the
vestee piece, either.  At one point you end up attempting to sew
together four doubled-over pieces of fabric!  Clean-finishing some of
the edges with a serger or with zig-zagging cuts down on the bulk
considerably.

Other than that, it went together much easier than other Folkwears I've
worked with.  If you've made any type of flat-collar shirt (the
non-collar-stand variety found almost exclusively for women, especially
in short-sleeved shirts), then this will be very easy to make up.

I should add that properly made up (with for-your-body width
adjustments) the shirt is _extremely_ comfortable to wear!  I can't
figure out why this style hasn't come back into fashion, it's so
comfortable!  It looks great with jeans too.
-- 
Diane Close
   close@lunch.engr.sgi.com
   I'm at lunch all day. :-)
   Pictures: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/pdc/gallery.html

------------------------------
From: close@lunch.engr.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: Bursting Digests!
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 14:07:02 -0700 (PDT)

As some of you may already know, it's possible to break digests (which
have been formatted to the RFC 1153 standard) down into individual
messages, allowing you to easily delete the messages you don't want to
read and reply individually to those you do want.  This eliminates the
minor inconvenience of gettting the digests, which sends all the weeks'
messages in one lump, and then having to cut and paste a whole bunch to
reply to individual messages.

A number of mail programs have built-in support for bursting digests.
Formail, which is part of the procmail distribution, can do it with its
-s and -d options.  MH can do it via the "burst" command.  VM (an
Emacs-based MUA) also has support for bursting:  you save the digest
(file filename filetype) and then type some commands (mailbook filename
filetype) after you leave mail.  Check your own mailing program's help
screen (or man page) to see if the "burst" feature is part of the mailer
you are already using.  Some news programs like nn can burst digests
too. And there are a few stand-alone digest bursting programs, some
better than others.

I've obtained and modified a small digest-bursting program so that it
will work with the digests produced for the h-costume mailing list.
Those digests, which are produced manually by Gretchen Miller, are not
up to RFC 1153 standards, but this new undigesting program will work
both on RFC 1153 standard digests and with our own h-costume digests.

BTW, if anyone is interested in seeing what's involved with the "RFC
1153" standard, you can view a hypertext description (one of many) at:

    http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/htbin/rfc/rfc1153.html

(One advantage of looking at a hypertext version of the RFC is that you
can easily jump to other RFCs that are referenced.)

The program I've located and modified for h-costume digests is called
called "undigest" and is written in C.  It's a fairly small, portable
program and I think that most people will find it fairly easy to use.
It can be set up as a program or as a mail filter.  Most of you will
find it easier to use it as a program rather than as a filter.

To get this program send the commands:

   get h-costume undigest.c
   end

to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com and the server will send you back the
file.  Save what the server sends you as a file called:

   undigest.c

You'll have to compile the program before it'll work, of course.  To
compile the program you need to remove the mailing headers and then type:

   cc -O undigest.c -o undigest

If the above command doesn't work, you'll have to ask your local
sysadmin how to compile "C" programs on your system.

When you next receive a digest in the mail, save it to a file and run
this program on it to break it into individual messages.  To run this
program on your digest file, you say:

   undigest < digest > mailfile

where "digest" is the name of the digest file you want it to work on.
Then read the file this process creates, mailfile, using your mail own
program (for example "elm -f mailfile").

If that works satisfactorily, you can read the comments in the program
to figure out how to use it as a mail filter.  I haven't tried that
method myself, but it should be easy enough to figure out how to do it.

Happy bursting everyone! :-)
-- 
Diane Close
   close@lunch.engr.sgi.com
   I'm at lunch all day. :-)

------------------------------ End of Volume 342 -----------------------


