From: owner-h-costume-digest (H-Costume Digest)
To: h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: H-Costume Digest V3 #193
Reply-To: h-costume
Errors-To: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


H-Costume Digest       Wednesday, September 20 1995       Volume 3, Number 193

  Compilation copyright (C) 1995  Diane Barlow Close and Gretchen Miller
  Use in whole prohibited.  Individual articles are the property of
  the author.  Seek permission from that author before reprinting or
  quoting elsewhere.

Important Addresses:

  Send submissions to:   h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com (or reply to
			  this message).
  Adds/drops/archives:   majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com
  Real, live person:     h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Topics:
    Looking for information on costume show giving (fwd)
    Re: Fabric Questions
    Re:  H-Costume Digest V3 #191
    Re: Fabric Questions/Musings
    Re: Past Patterns New patterns
    Re: Why are we here?
    Revised Class Schedule for East Bay Vintage Dance Society
    Why are we here?
    Button-down collars
    Authenticity
    Re:  H-Costume Digest V3 #191
    Tabby silk

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 12:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: close (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: Looking for information on costume show giving (fwd)

I'm passing this on to the h-costume list as perhaps someone here has more
information than I do on this subject.  I suggested contacting the San
Jose Historical Museum and posting on the Vintage Clothing mailing list.
I'll set "reply-to" to go to fhonnef@bgnet.bgsu.edu directly:

frederick honneffer <fhonnef@bgnet.bgsu.edu> wrote:

Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 08:40:42 -0400 (EDT)
> From: frederick honneffer <fhonnef@bgnet.bgsu.edu>
Subject: Looking for information
To: close

     I hope this is being read by Diane?  Hello, I am Eric Honneffer,
document conservator at Bowling Green State University and previously a
subscriber to h-costume.  I have a question that I am hoping you might be
able to answer or know who might.  A collegue of mine has been appointed
coordinator of Women's History week at Harper College in Palatine,
Illinois.  This will take place in the first week of March, 1996.  She
felt that it would be beneficial to have a fashion review with individuals
modeling American women's clothing from approximately the colonial period
to present.  The clothing she would like to include should be reflective
of the changing roles of women.  Do you know anyone whom she could contact
that would be willing to assist with this or perhaps has done a similar
production and could provide the needed expertise.  Any advice or 
information you or others could provide would be gratefully received.  
Thanks so much.

Eric Honneffer

Frederick  N. Honneffer
Document Conservator

Center for Archival Collections
Fifth Floor Jerome Library
Bowling Green State University
Bowling Green, Ohio 43403

fhonnef@bgnet.bgsu.edu

- -- 
Diane Close
   close@lunch.engr.sgi.com
   I'm at lunch all day. :-)

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 15:06:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: Teresa Shannon <tws@csd.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: Fabric Questions

Dear gaelscot[?]

Thank you for saying you enjoyed the post, your the first person to even 
mention it existed, I was beginning to wonder.

Most fabrics were woven or embroidered with designs, there was block 
printing, stamping, painting and powdering.  Block printing and painting 
are fairly obvious, powdering may have been attached by glue, but I don't 
know and there is very little information I've come across on what stamping 
consisted of, perhaps it was impression like modern cloque, perhaps it 
was more specific to attaching metal to the fabric.

Perhaps someone else knows.  Confession:  I really don't sew much, I 
don't know how and won't take a class as medieval techniques are vastly 
different from modern.  Actually I don't even research clothing, I'm 
looking for basic info on sumptuary legislation, what fabrics were more 
expensive than others and denied to the lower classes.  I think I have been 
very side-tracked by this group into costume research.  I do enjoy it 
though so I may as well stop fighting it.

> trying to catch up on garment construction of the 14th and 15th centuries.
> But so far I've confined myself to plain colors. Must I? And what about trim?
> Most of the paintings I've seen imply trim, but only sketch it in. Where can
> I find out more about what they usually used?

What paintings are you looking at?  Trim as I understand it in modern 
terms denotes a woven or embroidered fabric braid attached to the edging 
of a costume.  Which does not describe most of fourteenth century 
England.  England by the way was considered to have very simple dull 
dress compared with Italy, Germany, France especially fifteenth century.  
Anyway, there are stips of metal and jewels beaten and attached to fabric 
hems, and fur for edging mostly.  I have come across very occaisional 
references to edges the term appears as perfold and is supposed to come 
from the french pourfiler - to work on the edge, although what this 
consists of I don't know.

It was more important to get the right fabrics and brocades, linings and 
fur, and layers and cut, at least in fourteenth century England.  England 
also had a higher esteem of embroidery than France and the rest of the 
continent in this century, and paid a bundle for it on ecclesiastical 
garments and on royal special occasions.  But you wouldn't walk around 
just in a dress with embroidery on it.  Oh yes, buttons and needles (See 
Richard II) very dressy and important to show if you could afford it.

Found out I have many articles have to write the addendum over some time.
Specific question I might be more help on.  And don't be ashamed of your 
background, your hear and eager to learn which is the highest frame of 
mind possible as far as I'm concerned.  "All I know is that I know 
nothing" -Socrates

Teresa
> 

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 13:03:28 -0700
From: Susan Fatemi <susanf@rock.eerc.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re:  H-Costume Digest V3 #191

Re: that last posting from Dennis on proper corsets, posture and back problems,
reminded me that one of the places that does provide custom-made corsets are
medical supply houses! (for people with back problems)  I wear a "wrist corset"
to remind me to hold my hands in the correct "posture" at the keyboard, so the
doctor's comments about corsets makes sense.  Also, very large-busted women
often have severe back and shoulder problems (everyone see that episode on
Roseanne?) until they undergo reduction surgery (my mother had this done and
it made a world of difference)  
(2 c. worth of idle commentary)

Thanks to Teresa for posting that luscious info. on silks. Did anyone notice
how many of the terms used derive from Arabic or farther east? e.g. satin,
tabby, etc.  I know Europe was importiiing textiles from Mamluk Egypt and
Syria (Damascus) in this period, Frederick II (?) coronation robe was
Mamluk, I wonder if they (the Arabs) were weaving esp. for the European
market and/or if European weavers were copying islamic textiles.  Any Chinese
silks imported into Europe at this time (I think Teresa referred to the 14th
c. primariily)?

Susan Fatemi
susanf@eerc.berkeley.edu

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 95 14:01:29 PDT
From: julie_adams@corp.Cubic.COM
Subject: Re: Fabric Questions/Musings

Very off the cuff:  I believe there were a variety of stamping 
techniques, I think some are mentioned in Elizabeth's wardrobe 
unlocked, by Janet Arnold, using hot irons to impress a pattern, 
usually used to burn the velvet nap off, or impress a pattern into 
it.  From some bookbinding research, I know that is how they also 
apply metal to leather (the thin gilt layer).  Somewhere I saw a 
Jost Amman woodcut (late 16th cent.) of guys with patterned 
rollers putting a pattern on flat strips of something (could have 
been paper though), and try as I might I can't seem to re-find that 
woodcut!  Has anyone seen that one? The pattern matched the 
one on the German ladies banding seen on many Lucas Cranach 
paintings, which is usually painted without depth, very flat and 
shiny, unlike other brocades where if you look at the real painting 
there is a physical texture (in the same painting).  I was thinking 
this could be printed on a satin, but it would have to be printed on 
bias cut strips to work for trimming the gowns I had in mind.  
Hmmmm.  Maybe the lines are embroidered with satin stitches.  
Hmmmm. Then in one of the various cathedral museums (I think in 
Regensburg), I came across an ecclesiastical garment which had 
a smooth gold ground with one of *the patterns* I was looking for. 
 It had what seemed to be a single layer of semi-faded blackish 
red threads brocaded to make solid line patterns overall, but was 
not quite as orange in color as the pictures.  Hmmm again.  

I think I've seen the word "powdered" refer to cloth embroidered 
with sprinkled designs scattered about, referring to Byzantine 
fabric, but that was a modern, not period reference.  Some of the 
fabrics in German museums had a motif embroidered on one 
fabric, then the motif transferred and appliqued on the ground 
fabric.

From a practical aspect, I've known people who have tried 
painting/printing silk, supposedly with researched "period" 
materials, but have been dissappointed with rather poor results 
over the long term, but not familiar with the details.  I have read 
many references to painted decorative fabric (such as for 
Tournaments), but those were not expected to stay pretty.  Horse 
sweat and weapons are nasty on fabric.  

Thanks Teresa, I really love the fabric info.
- -- julie adams

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 18:14:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Peter LEE <lee@scooby.cs.umass.edu>
Subject: Re: Past Patterns New patterns

Hi there,

>> Past patterns phone #: 616-245-9465
>
> I tried that number it was the wrong one.

Oops a typo-

Past Patterns phone # is:
616-245-9456

Sorry...

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 21:21:11 -0400
From: McMovers@aol.com
Subject: Re: Why are we here?

Alright, I'll step out of the shadows and be counted.  I rarely ever post
anything because I'm not that knowledgable about historical costuming.  I'm a
dance historian and i've found the mailing list to be interesting,
informative and amusing.  I'm forced from time to time to put together
costuming for dances myself and I try to be as historically acurate as
possible.  I feel it is important to the integrity of any historical dancing
to be wearing clothing as true to the time as possible.  I find that just
putting on the right clothes can completely change your way of moving and
then your way of thinking and feeling.  I confess to being one of those
people who sit and gripe through movies when I feel the clothes are not true
to the time period (this drives my husband crazy!)  I can't help it, the
effect jars me right out of and "suspension of disbelief" and the movie is
ruined.  
Anachronistic hair-dos really bug me, too.  I used to work for the LIvng
History Centre in the SF Bay Area and they were pretty strict about having
the "right" clothes, hair ect.
It was alittle annoying at first but in truth i appreciated their efforts.
 No one ever suggested that costumes should be hand sewn, however, I can't
even imagine tackling that!  I usually need my costumes done yesterday!
I've found this list to be a great source for patterns and things like steel
boning  and hoop wire.  I learn new things all the time and questions are
raised- What are cartridge pleats and I've been wondering what samite was
since I was about 14 years old?  Plus, I've just been forced to move across
the country to VA where I know no one and this is the closest thing to adult
conversation I get somedays.

Jen
"The forces of evil are... a really, really bad thing!"  
                                                          -the Tick

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 20:10:34 -0700
From: Allan Terry <aterry@Teknowledge.COM>
Subject: Revised Class Schedule for East Bay Vintage Dance Society

                      VINTAGE DANCE CLASSES

The REVISED East Bay Vintage Dance Society schedule for the rest of
September through November is:

September 23:  Ragtime dance taught by Stan Isaacs
September 30:  Boston variations taught by Allan Terry & Frances Grimble
October 7:  Victorian waltz variations taught by Terry & Grimble
October 14:  Authentic Regency waltzes taught by Terry & Grimble
October 21:  Regency longways sets with authentic steps taught by 
             Terry & Grimble.  Dances researched for this class
October 28:  NO CLASS--THE HALL WAS RENTED OUT FROM UNDER US
November 4:  Victorian dance
November 11:  Victorian dance
November 18:  Victorian dance
November 25:  NO CLASS--THANKSGIVING



          SPECIAL RENAISSANCE CANARY WORKSHOP ON DECEMBER 16


The Victorian dances taught will include mazurka waltzes, 5/4 waltzes,
Newport, Napoleonienne, Bronco, and interesting polka, galop, and
schottische variations.  All dance variations are researched from original
sources, some especially for this class.  We do our best to always teach
fresh and interesting material, and to teach good styling.

All classes will be held on Saturday mornings, 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at

St. Johns Presbyterian Church
2727 College Avenue, Room 203
Berkeley, California

The price is $6/person.  No partner required.

Men and couples are certainly welcome.  But if any women are worried about
having a partner--for some reason this class consistently has more men than
women.

This is a regular series of weekly classes that will continue in upcoming
months.  

For further information, call Clare Burmeister at (510) 527-5588.  Or e-mail
clareb@consensus.com or aterry@teknowledge.com

------------------------------

Date: 20 Sep 95 23:10:23 EDT
From: "Dawn T. Jacobson" <74647.1271@compuserve.com>
Subject: Why are we here?

Stella Nemeth asked:

>Why are we here?<

I'm here because I'm a historian, and a lover of "dress-up". 8-D I was fortunate
enough to learn to sew when I was small (around 7), and have a mother that loved
to make elaborate costumes for me to play "dress-up" in (she's now doing the
same for my niece). This, combined with a tremendous love for history, has
resulted in my building and wearing historical costumes for different purposes
for more than 20 years now. 

This particular list serves as a useful adjunct to the fora on the commercial
on-line services--postings tend to be longer, more carefully thought out (under
most circumstances), and delve into some unusual aspects of historical costuming
that may be overlooked in other arenas. I find it interesting that, in many
cases, subjects under discussion here frequently are paralleled in other
forums/newsgroups/listservs.

>...what do you think of the various authenticity discussions?<

Discussions of various points of authenticity, also referred to as "arguing over
the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin," does actually serve a
useful purpose. Frequently it is nit-picking, and serves no purpose but to churn
up everything, including many people's stomach juices. 8-> It can, however,
disseminate information, and slowly move the entire hobby/sport/lifestyle that
revolves around historic costuming forward. The base level of historical
costuming seen at most events is much higher now than it was 15-20 years ago. It
is easier to find research materials, patterns, and historically correct fabrics
and accessories. All of this has come about, not only by growth in the hobby,
but by those participating slowly "raising up the bar" by arguing fine points
and demanding more of themselves and everyone around them. I dislike
ill-mannered, acrimonious discussions--they only hurt other people's feelings.
However, a clever, witty discussion can be both fun and a learning experience.
That "Send" key may a little too accessible--it _is_ a great temptation to dash
off a scathing reply to a post in the heat of the moment. However, every time
I've done it, I've felt a complete fool the instant the message is on its way,
with no way of retrieving it. Perhaps we all should be required to write our
comments, then allow them to sit in our computers for 24 hours before they may
be sent on--it would allow time for tempers to cool, and reason to clear. 8-)

Enough lecturing for this evening. Go outside and play!

Dawn T. Jacobson
74674.1271@compuserve.com
"If you haven't grown up by 35, you don't have to!"
         --Dinotopian adage

------------------------------

Date: 20 Sep 95 23:10:26 EDT
From: "Dawn T. Jacobson" <74647.1271@compuserve.com>
Subject: Button-down collars

A perusal of old Sears catalogs has revealed that in 1900, a man could buy a
flannel "fireman's shirt" with pearl buttons at the collar points. The only
"button-down" collared shirts between 1900 and 1908 were made of flannel, and
were specifically "overshirts" for working outdoors. By 1927 (my latest
catalog), Sears did not carry any type of button-down collared shirt.

Unfortunately, I have no idea when the button-down collared dress shirt (aka
"the Preppie") became popular.

Dawn T. Jacobson
74674.1271@compuserve.com

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:15:47 -0400
From: kl94ag@badger.ac.BrockU.CA (Kathleen Leggat)
Subject: Authenticity

        Hello!

        I don't want to cause any ripples, but I did want to say something
in defence of the SCA and creative application of costuming research.

        I _do_ envy the authenticity standards involved in Civil War
Re-enactment groups and with the SCA was a little closer to this level.  On
the other hand, that level can be daunting for new interested parties.

        I, myself, flunked Home Ec. and never finished a sewing project in
my life until I joined the SCA 5 years ago.  I couldn't finish a nightgown,
but within a month of joining the SCA I had actually made an Elizabethan
bodice and skirt!  (I still can't make mundane clothes...I don't know why.)

        I simply could not have joined a rigidly authentic re-enactment
group.  I didn't have the skills or money.  

        Because of my involvement in the SCA, however, I'm now a fairly
well-respected costumer...about to make a giant leap forward in quality due
to this list. :)

        However, I still consider myself a costume designer.  I understand
the appeal of recreating a portrait, but let's face it, if we _were_ 16th
century noblewomen and copied the gown of the queen exactly, we would have
found ourselves in a lot of hot water.

        Also, a minor noblewoman might have one or two gowns.  If I put all
my time and money into a single gown a year (and didn't buy mundane clothes)
I could possibly afford to create one of these miracles of authenticity. But
I can't. (Of course, I would be afraid to wear it!  One lout steps on your
hem while you're dancing...one beer gets spilled on your bodice...one
cigarette butt is left burning on the ground...and it's just too expensive
to replace.) So I use coat-lining satin, upholstery velvet and cotton.  And
I use a machine for everything I can get away with.

        We naturally bring modern sensibilities of cleanliness, beauty,
modesty, colour and pattern coordination to everything we create. (How many
people recreate authentic 16th century make-up?  Ugh!) Why should we feel
embarrassed about bringing along the modern sensibility of financial
concerns?  And of time management in a world that expects different tasks
from us than from our 16th century predecessors?

        One more comment in defense of the SCA.  We learn history by trying
to recreate it.  And we _do_ learn.  As soon as an intrigued newcomer
attends his first event, he learns about costuming, food, dancing,
broadsword fighting, music, pageantry...not everything, and not every detail
is correct, but he is still learning more than he knew before, and maybe
he'll be interested enough to do his own research.

        Okay...one more comment.  As far as I know, the SCA is the only
thing around.  Does anyone know of 16th century re-enactment group with a
chapter in Southern Ontario?

        *plink, plink*

        Kathleen (Catriona)

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:27:51 -0400
From: margritt@mindspring.com (Margritte)
Subject: Re:  H-Costume Digest V3 #191

At 1:03 PM 9/20/95, Susan Fatemi wrote:

>Thanks to Teresa for posting that luscious info. on silks. Did anyone notice
>how many of the terms used derive from Arabic or farther east? e.g. satin,
>tabby, etc.

I hope I'm not too far off subject with this, but it's been driving me
nuts... Can anybody relate the story of how the word "tabby" came to be
applied to striped cats? I heard it once, but the story went in one ear and
out the other. I think the word originally was a title for a ruler, or
perhaps the land he ruled, and then it was used to describe a type of
cloth, and then later came to be used to describe cats. Can anyone fill in
the holes? Thanks.

- -Margritte

- ------------------------------------------------------------
Gryphon's Moon - Request our free catalog of Celtic jewelry.

email margritt@mindspring.com or check out our web page at
http://www.mindspring.com/~maclain/

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 15:42:44 +1000 (EST)
From: Carolyn Fraser <cfraser@lingua.cltr.uq.oz.au>
Subject: Tabby silk

On Thu, 21 Sep 1995, Margritte wrote:

> I hope I'm not too far off subject with this, but it's been driving me
> nuts... Can anybody relate the story of how the word "tabby" came to be
applied to striped cats.


It would appear that the markings on a tabby cat were seen to be similar 
to tabby silk in apearance.  The Draper's Dictionary: a Manual of Textile 
Fabrics Their History and Application (published 1882), begins the entry 
under TABBY with:  A kind of silk taffety watered or waved.  After 
listing similar definitions from Bailey, and Johnson, it lists this from 
Richardson:  A kind of waved silk; an artificial stone, a mixture of 
shells, gravel, stones and water. (Fr. tabis, Persian utabi, a kind of 
rich waved silk).  *[I think the wavy stripes and blobby spots on my old 
tabby's fur are very much like this description!]

After various other descriptions of a similar nature, the entry reads:

A manufacture introduced here *[the dict. was published in London] by the 
French refugees of 1685, and previously imported from their country.  
"Tabby Grogram: and "Tabbies of Silk Towers" are shown as imports in the 
time of Charles I, and Strutt quotes from an inventory of the wardrobe of 
his successor, Tabby at 8s. 6d., Morello Tabby, from 10s. 6d. to 11s., 
and Scarlet Morello Tabby at 12s. the yard.  


The entry ends with some quotes from 17th century writings showing the 
use of the word as applied to clothing, one of which is from Pepys.  


BTW - my Oz dictionary (The Macquarie) suggests that the word originated 
from "'Attabiya", a quarter of Baghdad, presumably where waved or watered 
silk originated?  Any comments?
 

Carolyn Fraser
Brisbane, Australia

------------------------------

End of H-Costume Digest V3 #193
*******************************

A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, send the command lines:

    unsubscribe h-costume-digest
    subscribe h-costume
    end

in the body of a message to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com.

Thanks and enjoy the list!
