From: owner-h-costume-digest (H-Costume Digest)
To: h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: H-Costume Digest V3 #210
Reply-To: h-costume
Errors-To: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


H-Costume Digest         Tuesday, October 3 1995         Volume 3, Number 210

  Compilation copyright (C) 1995  Diane Barlow Close and Gretchen Miller
  Use in whole prohibited.  Individual articles are the property of
  the author.  Seek permission from that author before reprinting or
  quoting elsewhere.

Important Addresses:

  Send submissions to:   h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com (or reply to
			  this message).
  Adds/drops/archives:   majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com
  Real, live person:     h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Topics:
    Re: on getting your clothes (and hands?) dirty
    Pattern Books
    1880s dresses
    clothing for dance?
    RE: Men's Shirt - Approx 1780
    re: general Authenticity
    Knitted mail
    ISBN numbers for Little Costume...
    Re: costume collection guide
    Corset boning
    Re: Corset boning
    Re: Corset boning
    RE: Musings: woodcut and rollers 
    Re: Corset boning
    RE: Corset boning

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 08:54:04 -0500 (EST)
From: "Kimberly R. Gilbert" <kgilbert@indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: on getting your clothes (and hands?) dirty

On Tue, 3 Oct 1995, Victoria Gilliam wrote:

> I thought the point that Dennis was trying to make was first that black 
> would show through any light colored clothes, and second that sweating in 
> black could either a) stain your outer clothes with black or b) stain 
> your skin (I've had black shoes stain white socks when they got damp).
> 
Actually, leotards are made to be exercised in and therefore sweated 
into.  If this is still a concern, just buy a good-quality leotard
from someone like Capezio or Danskin.

Kimberly R. Gilbert     Dreamers have mountains they can climb
SCA Anne Fenton         There are dreamers who don't believe in time
                        Only dreamers have worlds where they can go far away.

------------------------------

Date: 03 Oct 95 09:55:56 EDT
From: "Dawn T. Jacobson" <74647.1271@compuserve.com>
Subject: Pattern Books

Krista (sunfire@muskoka.com) asked:

>>Could anyone recommend a great book for someone who really can only work from
patterns, that would be similar to, but maybe more historically acurate than say
the Katherine Holkeboer book,  "Patterns for Theatrical Costumes"??<<

_Period Costume for Stage and Screen_ by Jean Hunnisett (Players Press, Inc.,
Studio City: 1991). The first volume covers women's clothes from 1500-1800; the
second volume covers 1800-1909. They are relatively expensive (about $40 per
volume) and worth every penny. Each volume contains good, basic information like
"how to drape a toile" and "building corsets"; lots of patterns (on grids, so
that they can be enlarged and modified easily); and excellently written
construction directions, complete with tips to make "rough spots" easier. Also
included in each volume are complete patterns and instructions for all the
necessary underpinnings. These are the books used by most of the major
historical costumers I know of on the West Coast, and probably throughout the
United States; personally, if I could only have 2 books on historical costume
construction, it would be these two (they're that good).

Dawn Jacobson
74647.1271@compuserve.com

------------------------------

Date: 03 Oct 95 09:55:59 EDT
From: "Dawn T. Jacobson" <74647.1271@compuserve.com>
Subject: 1880s dresses

Joan Broenski asked:

>>I would like to know what colors are suitable for an 1880's dress.  It =
seems that  I've seen a lot of black.  Was this worn for every day wear, =
or just for mourning?=20<<

Lots of colors were extremely popular during the 1880s, frequently in
combinations that appear truly garish to 20th Century eyes (or did, until it
became OK to dye one's hair purple or lime green 8-) ). Black was often used,
simply because it was a popular color--went with everything, and didn't show the
dirt. A quick perusal of Stella Blum's _Victorian Fashions & Costumes from
"Harper's Bazar": 1867-1898_ (Dover Books, NY: 1974), has turned up a dinner
dress of Isabelle yellow brocade with darker golden brown plush and white lace
(p. 122), an evening gown of turquoise lampas, turquoise satin and straw-colored
Surah, trimmed with red roses, a dark green grosgrain (aka "faille") walking
suit, trimmed with red wool (p. 133), a red and black Autumn toilette (p. 145),
a violet and ecru watering-place costume (p. 158), a walking dress in golden
brown wool and brown and grey-blue striped silk (p. 163), a red and white
striped Summer toilette (p. 170), and my personal choice for the "bad taste
costs no more" award, an house gown in black, brocaded with clusters of pink
barley spikes, and trimmed with pink pleatings and a corselet of pink silk
crepon. 8-)

>>Also, any suggestions on how to make a good bustle?  From pictures I've seen
the way they are looped and draped looks rather complicated."<<

The secret to a good bustle is having a good foundation. Jean Hunnisett's book
_Period Costume for Stage and Screen_ (Vol II: Patterns for Women's Dress
1800-1909) (Players Press, Inc., Studio City: 1991) gives patterns and detailed
instructions on building a pad bustle, a ruffled petticoat, and a bustle made
with spring steel/hooping wire. These patterns work--I've built the pad bustle
and ruffled petticoat, and it works extremely well under my 1889 ballgown. Ms.
Hunnisett also give very good instructions on how to build the skirt/dress with
enough fullness to allow for graceful draping, and how to secure the "looped up"
skirt. Through trial and error, I've found the best way to drape a skirt over a
bustle is to put the dress on my dress form with all the underpinnings, then
fiddle and pin until I have it just the way I want it. I put in temporary tacks
to hold the folds until I can get the dress off the dress form and secure them
properly.

Dawn Jacobson
74647.1271@compuserve.com

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 10:22:24 -0500 (EST)
From: "Kimberly R. Gilbert" <kgilbert@indiana.edu>
Subject: clothing for dance?

This may not actually fit into these groups, but does anyone know
where I can find pictures of clothing worn in American Heritage and/or
International Folk dances?  I've tried the library, but am probably
looking in the wrong place (I can't imagine not having very much
info on this in a library this size).  Any ideas that people want to
send would be much appreciated.
Thanks,

Kimberly R. Gilbert     Dreamers have mountains they can climb
SCA Anne Fenton         There are dreamers who don't believe in time
                        Only dreamers have worlds where they can go far away.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 07:44:39 -0400
From: Kjotvi@aol.com
Subject: RE: Men's Shirt - Approx 1780

The best source I've seen for the era is "Rural Pennsylvania Clothing" by
Ellen J.Gehret, published by Liberty Cap Books, York, Pennsylvania.

It covers all you need to know to reproduce the entire outfit for rural men
or women from about 1750 to 1800. The focus is on reproducing the garments,
the sewing and construction detail is excellent, but it is a little light on
historical contexts for the various examples. I think that it is probably the
best source for your situation.

a few quick notes: As a general rule the neck openings of shirts did not have
plackets until about the1840's and then only for the wealthy, and the only
major change in the lower class shirt from 1750 to 1860 is that the
rectangular sleeves gathered into the shoulder and cuff are replaced
somewhere after 1800 by sleves which taper into the cuff with little or no
gathering at cuff or shoulder and the collar and cuffs become narrower. .

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 07:44:27 -0400
From: Kjotvi@aol.com
Subject: re: general Authenticity

Concerning the discussions about the relative authenticity of groups, here's
my two bits worth.  Back in september there was a posting which stated: "I
_do_ envy the authenticity standards involved in Civil War Re-enactment
groups and with the SCA was a little closer to this level."

I left the SCA over a decade ago (not for authenticity reasons, I just
realized that I wasn't interested in doing nobility, and that was about all
the SCA did back then). Eventually I drifted into fur trade re-enactment and
thought "now I'll see some REAL living history!" It turned out that the
standards were not all that much higher than tha SCA had been, the
self-styled experts still out-numbered and out-shouted those with real
knowlege, and the proprotion of those just coasting on hear-say documentation
was just as high.

What made it all the more infuriating was that the the answers were so much
more documentable, as the time period was re;atively recent, and limited to
twenty years. I think the SCA can be given a little slack considering that
their period covers nearly a thousand years, and for many of them what
information does exist can be vary hard to find.

I think one of the answers for all these groups is for those who know to
produce clear and documented information on appropriate costume with the
focus on steering new participants away from the more glaring mistakes, to
make this info widely available, and most importantly to admit up front our
own limitations. To say "I believe" or "I believe strongly" rather than "I am
sure that..." as it is hard for a new member to know what to take literally
and what not to. This could be anything from a full fledged instruction book
to a list of the ten best and worst costume books for a particular era with
the reasons why, and the ten most common or easily avoided costume mistakes
for the beginner.

If any wish to discuss (or argue) the matter, please e-mail me directly, as
it can be a month or more between occasions when I have time to download our
back issues of H-Costume Digest.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 07:44:16 -0400
From: Kjotvi@aol.com
Subject: Knitted mail

Several months ago there was a long discussion of the term "knitted" in
reference to mail (okay, so it's taken me this long to find the time to
download my digests! Mea Culpa!). Two things come to mind that may or may not
have been eventually mentioned:

1) In the Society for Creative Anachronism (SCA) the act of using two pliers
to join wire rings into mail is refered to as "knitting" simply because, with
practice, it looks like a little old lady knitting (and the domestic immagery
is amusingly ironic when applied to the concept of a verile warrior).

2) In n Osprey Men at Arms book on armor of the Roman Republic, they showed a
diagram of early form of the Lorica Hamata formed of mail that was supposedly
made of a length of wire literally knitted, ie: repeatedly looped through
itself in a continnuing sort of chain stitch. The text mentioned that this
form was fairly quickly replaced with the far stronger and more flexible form
of seperately interlinked wire rings that would remain the standard
throughout the Middle Ages, and is what most of us think of when we hear the
term "Mail".

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 08:56:52 -0700
From: Joan Broneske <unicorn@calweb.com>
Subject: ISBN numbers for Little Costume...

Someone was looking for ISBN numbers for the Little Costume Workbook Series.  Here they are:

The Little Bodice Book
ISBN: 0-89676-131-2

The Little Hatmaking Book
ISBN: 0-89676-126-6

The Little Hatmaking Book II
ISBN: 0-89676-127-4

The Little Hatmaking Book III
ISBN: 0-89676-128-2

The Little Corset Construction Book
ISBN: 0-89676-130-4

The Little Dressmaking Book
ISBN: 0-89676-129-0

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 09:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Deborah Tarsiewicz - 3528981 <dtarsiew@nunic.nu.edu>
Subject: Re: costume collection guide

	

On Mon, 2 Oct 1995, nelso230@maroon.tc.umn.edu wrote:

>  ... Maybe we should also attempt to compile a regional guide
>  to costume collections based on the accumulated personal knowledge of list
>  subscribers...

	This sounds like a wonderful idea. I would love to have access
	to such a guide :D

	Deborah Tarsiewicz			dtarsiew@nunic.nu.edu

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 13:48:50 -500
From: "Carol Kocian" <CKOCIAN@epe.org>
Subject: Corset boning

The other day, I asked,

    "Since corset boning is available, why are people so interested in 
finding something else to use?"

    In a personal note, Bronwyn pointed out that metal stays were not 
the only thing used in corsets. She is correct; my comment was about 
suggestions of industrial metal strapping for corset stays.

    Bronwyn reminded me that dried grasses were used early on. Does 
anyone know what type of grass, and where to find it now? Chair 
caning seems to be a suitable material now, but I would not recommend 
bamboo. The "boning" needs to be flexible enough to bend without 
breaking into pointy-ended pieces!

    Whalebone, as we all know, was most commonly used through many 
eras. Since we can't get it now, what is a reasonable substitute? 
I've never had the chance to bend a piece of real whalebone to see 
how flexible it is. Has anyone else? Museums are rather picky about 
letting people bend their artifacts, and an old piece of whalebone 
may be less flexible than a new piece. 
    One friend has tried cutting strips of bleach bottles to use for 
stays. He said they were the same flexibility as whalebone. If that 
is the case, would plastic featherboning also be the same as 
whalebone?
    I also heard that a set of stays half-boned (a space between 
each bone, or stay) with metal stays would work the same as a set 
fully-boned (stays right next to each other with only one row of 
stitching between them) with whalebone. This would also support the 
use of plastic featherboning. I've seen stays using about six pieces 
of featherboning in them - the boning bends & doesn't do much to hold 
the shape of the stays. But what if the stays were fully boned with 
the featherboning? Has anyone tried this? Is it hotter to wear 
plastic in stays, or is just as hot to wear metal?

    Corsets, stays, and jumps were also stiffened with cording. Some 
19thC corsets (particularly 1820 - 1870) had sections of cording 
between the metal stays. There have been references to "packthread", 
which I took to mean cording. The cord used does not have to be 
stiff. Cable cord can be used, but it does need to be compressed 
while stitched. I've tried drapery pull cord - it's very stiff & 
works well. I found it made of natural fiber, but most available 
today is synthetic. I avoided the synthetic because I thought it 
would be hotter to wear.
    Since cording is round, it takes up more fabric and makes the 
corset smaller. I discovered this the hard way & fixed it by putting 
an extra panel in my garment. My (uncompressed) waist is around 32", 
my bust around 36", and I needed an extra 4" to make it fit again. 
Does anyone have a formula for estimating the amount taken up by 
cording?

    In her talk at the Louisbourg encampment this summer, Suzanne 
Gousse talked about the corset worn by French Canadian settlers. 
(1750's) She said the English equivalent would be Jumps. The corset 
was stiffened by sewing the paper pattern right into the garment, and 
two pieces of boning were in the center front edges. Suzanne 
substitutes heavyweight pellon in her corset so she will be able to 
wash it.

    Does anyone else have information about 18thC jumps? I've heard 
of women's waistcoats, worn as an extra layer in colder climates, 
like New England. They can be confused for jumps in museum 
collections. I've read that jumps are lightly boned stays, worn by 
the lower class. I believe Norah Waugh's _Corsets & Crinolines_ is 
where I saw the quote, "A lady in stays, a slattern in jumps."

    -Carol Kocian

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 21:40:34 +0200 (EET)
From: Lynoure Rajam{ki <lynoure@clinet.fi>
Subject: Re: Corset boning

On Tue, 3 Oct 1995, Carol Kocian wrote:

> use of plastic featherboning. I've seen stays using about six pieces 
> of featherboning in them - the boning bends & doesn't do much to hold 
> the shape of the stays. But what if the stays were fully boned with 
> the featherboning? Has anyone tried this? Is it hotter to wear 
> plastic in stays, or is just as hot to wear metal?

I've made a ribbon corset (from around year 1900) with 16 plastic bones, 
because I haven't found metal boning here. The bones held (and still hold) 
the shape very well and allowed me to lace about 5cm smaller than my normal 
waist (I didn't try lacing tighter because I wanted to feel comfortable) 
without any problems in the shape. (FYI: The 16 bones in the ribbon 
corset was arranged in 4 groups of 4 bones in each (back, front and 
sides), so the bones kinda supported each other as they were to  close 
next to each other).

This summer I made an experimental fantasy corset (sorry, this is a bit 
non-historic but this is here to explain the effect of the plastic boning) 
with 11 plastic bones and I wore it laced quite tight for one and half 
days before the bones bent too much and the shape was (temporarily) 
ruined. The bones were evenly around the corset. If I would have sewn 22 
bones  (11 groups of bones, 2 bones in each) I think it might have worked 
better (but that worked weel enough for me, anyway, for that purpose that 
I had...)

						Lynoure
					
					
					

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 13:15:12 -0700
From: erin1@uclink4.berkeley.edu (Erin Harvey Moody)
Subject: Re: Corset boning

>    Bronwyn reminded me that dried grasses were used early on. Does
>anyone know what type of grass, and where to find it now?

I have read references to "reeds" being used in pre 1760 corsets.  I am not
sure what variety is referred to, but I think this would support the use of
chair strapping/caning material. I have a source for caning, email me
direct for info.
>
>    Whalebone, as we all know, was most commonly used through many
>eras. Since we can't get it now, what is a reasonable substitute?
>I've never had the chance to bend a piece of real whalebone to see
>how flexible it is. Has anyone else? Museums are rather picky about
>letting people bend their artifacts, and an old piece of whalebone
>may be less flexible than a new piece.

Whalebone (when not fossilized) would have been less flexible than spiral
boning, and a little more flexible than spring steel boning.  I believe
that one of the main interests in whalebones (in the 19th C) was that it
was more easily maleable during the steam molding process than steal
boning. If you read the advertisments of the period, rusting was a big
consideration, whalebone doesn't rust.

>    One friend has tried cutting strips of bleach bottles to use for
>stays. He said they were the same flexibility as whalebone. If that
>is the case, would plastic featherboning also be the same as
>whalebone?

I would not recommend using plastic anything in making a period
reproduction corset.  Once plastic is bent, it is useless.  Also when
plastic is warmed (by body heat) it will change shape.  The entire use of
the corset is to train and maintain a particular shape, plastics are just
not practical

------------------------------

Date: Tue,  3 Oct 95 14:08:55 PDT
From: julie_adams@corp.Cubic.COM
Subject: RE: Musings: woodcut and rollers 

> I have done some research into leather embossing, and found 
>that a common method of embossing leather at that time was 
>with large wood, and then metal plates, perhaps rollers. 

I think the strips were between 4" and 1' wide, as well as being 
very long (at least 15').  Having worked a lot with leather, I think it 
would be hard to keep the pattern pressed evenly using a roller 
that wide.  It looked a lot like a paint roller with a single handle.  
To remain even at that width, I would think a leather roller would 
need to be more like a rolling pin (so you could apply pressure on 
each side).  It looked like they were laying down a dark pattern 
on lighter material (paper? fabric?).  There was one guy 
printing/stamping, another guy laying out (for drying?), and there 
were rolled up spools of it of various widths, looking like narrow 
wrapping paper rolls.  Maybe it was wall paper?  I do remember 
that there was no title or text for that particular woodcut. 
Bummer.  Ah well, just one more mystery....And if anyone comes 
across it, I would sure like to find it again.  Obviously I stared at it 
a lot at the time, but I would sure like to have another look.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 17:44:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Judy Gerjuoy <jaelle@access.digex.net>
Subject: Re: Corset boning

If my memory isn't playing me false, Janet Arnold said that reeds were 
used for boning in corsets.  I have the lecture on tape; with enough 
prodding I can replay it and check it out.

Jaelle
jaelle@access.digex.net

------------------------------

Date: Tue,  3 Oct 95 12:47:31 TZ
From: Edward Wright <edwright@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: Corset boning

|     Bronwyn reminded me that dried grasses were used early on. Does
| anyone know what type of grass, and where to find it now?

These bundles of reeds were called "bents"  and came from a type of sea 
grass.  If you live near the ocean, you might be able to find it today.



| Chair caning seems to be a suitable material now, but I would not recommend
| bamboo. The "boning" needs to be flexible enough to bend without
| breaking into pointy-ended pieces!

I've seen references to cane used for hoops, but not for corset boning. 
The one person I know who has used cane to make a farthingale 
disrecommends it -- she says the cane becomes quite brittle after it 
has dried and aged.  (You must wet the cane in order to shape it.)  If 
brittleness is a problem in a hoop skirt, I think it would be even more 
of a problem in a corset.



|     Whalebone, as we all know, was most commonly used through many
| eras. Since we can't get it now, what is a reasonable substitute?
| I've never had the chance to bend a piece of real whalebone to see
| how flexible it is. Has anyone else?

The whalebone I have handled is stiffer than the rigilene plastic 
boning, but not quite as stiff as metal boning.  Similar to the 
polystyrene sheet plastic sold in model shops.



|     One friend has tried cutting strips of bleach bottles to use for
| stays. He said they were the same flexibility as whalebone. If that
| is the case, would plastic featherboning also be the same as
| whalebone?

The problem with featherboning is that it does not retain its own 
shape, but starts to conform to the body's natural curves, so that 
after one or two wearings, the body shapes the corset rather than vice 
versa.  Other plastics, such as polystyrene, might have the same problem.


There is one other material besides whalebone and bents that was used 
for early corsets, and it is still readily available today.  Wood.  The 
problem with wooden stays is that you would probably have to remove 
them before you laundered the corset, but the same is true of reeds.

------------------------------

End of H-Costume Digest V3 #210
*******************************

A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, send the command lines:

    unsubscribe h-costume-digest
    subscribe h-costume
    end

in the body of a message to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com.

Thanks and enjoy the list!
