From: owner-h-costume-digest (H-Costume Digest)
To: h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: H-Costume Digest V3 #248
Reply-To: h-costume
Sender: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Errors-To: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


H-Costume Digest         Sunday, November 12 1995         Volume 3, Number 248

  Compilation copyright (C) 1995  Diane Barlow Close and Gretchen Miller
  Use in whole prohibited.  Individual articles are the property of
  the author.  Seek permission from that author before reprinting or
  quoting elsewhere.

Important Addresses:

  Send submissions to:   h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com (or reply to
			  this message).
  Adds/drops/archives:   majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com
  Real, live person:     h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Topics:
    Re: Gloves and Gauntlets 
    Re: cotehardies etc. 
    Re: costume pattern request
    Historical Hairdresser in East Bay Area
    re: 19th century supplies
    Re: Gloves as Protection for late 15 cent.
    Historic style hairdressing
    Victorian fichus
    Pith Helmets
    Re: cotehardies etc. 
    Re: ISBN numbers
    Re: Gloves as Protection for late 15 cent.
    Victorian fichus
    Panne Velour
    Material for Tunic
    quilting

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 95 12:17:28 PST
From: ches@tristero.io.com
Subject: Re: Gloves and Gauntlets 

- ---------------Original Message---------------
>In reply to:Rhodry <rsaylor@scs.unr.edu>

I'm using a leather gauntlrt as a base, and then sewing over it a butchers
glove. The butchers glove is finely made chainmail, and is extremely
srturdy. It's giving me a nice look even if it is just sometyhing I made
up...

Miesje.


- ----------End of Original Message----------

There is a Don from Houston who 11 years ago used the mailed glove for 
fighting.  You may wish to track him down to see what he did.  Don Erik of the 
Silver Hand was his name, (although I think he used Silvanus too), he was a 
cadet to Don Simon at the time I think.

- -------------------------------------
Ciao
Ches
E-mail: Ches@io.com
This message was sent by Chameleon 
- -------------------------------------

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 13:59:15 -0600 (CST)
From: Teresa Shannon <tws@csd.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: cotehardies etc. 

> On bias cuts and using wide fabric:  Based on how some original 
> garments are pieced together, I would hypothesize that they 
> sewed the widths of cloth together and then cut them out for 
> many of these bias-cut or very wide gored garments.  I am basing 
> this suggestion on the pattern layouts in Janet Arnold's Patterns 
> of Fashion, and some information that cloth was not normally 
> woven in very wide widths.  Does anyone have any primary 
> sources documenting this?
> 
> 
I can only tell you that some cloth was woven on very wide widths.  
Broadlooms produces cloths from 1.5 to 2 yards wide, and some paynim 
looms even wider when weaving satin for tents.  Zupko's _Medieval Weights 
and Measures_ of all kinds of time connotations are great, he is an 
expert, and nice as he is a "homeboy" professor.  Also, the History of 
Agricultural Prices by Thorold Rogers, the Museum of London Textile book 
discusses looms and loom and cloth widths.  John Munro's work in Flanders 
for the fourteenth century, his books and articles are a treasure trove 
of information.  I would have to look at the few translations of the 
Great Wardrobe Account to see if they mention widths, I know they often 
specify lengths.

For the paynim stuff the Hispanic Textile book is illuminating.

Teresa

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 16:05:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Karen Mercedes <mercedes@access.digex.net>
Subject: Re: costume pattern request

On Thu, 9 Nov 1995, David Dill wrote:

> Hi!  I am looking for a pattern to make a 1969-looking 
> suede coat with fringe, such as was worn by many 
> hippies of the day.  If you have any info on how I
> might find such a thing, I would surely appreciate it.
> If not, any other information, such as where I might
> find an example of one (perhaps in a particular movie
> or something) so that I could really look at it to 

I have the real thing, from the 1960s (not the pattern, the jacket) -- it 
is a jacket, not a full-length coat, but if you're interested, I would be 
willing to sell it to you for you to either use or reverse engineer.  
It's about a size 10 (women's)/38 men's.

Karen Mercedes
mercedes@access.digex.net

+--------------------------------------------------+
| You know, it never seems to occur to people that |
| a man might just want to write a piece of music. |
|                        -- Ralph Vaughan Williams |
+--------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 14:47:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Jamie Nikkel <jnikkel@bbnplanet.com>
Subject: Historical Hairdresser in East Bay Area

Does anyone know of someone that does historic style hairdressing in the
Berkelely/Oakland/Richmond, CA area? I need mine done in a 1910 era style
twice in December. They need to be willing work on Saturdays. Thanks.

Jamie Nikkel
jnikkel@bbnplanet.com

Jamie Nikkel                        jnikkel@bbnplanet.com
Western Region Sales Administrator  tel. direct: (415) 528-7114
BBN Planet Corporation              tel. sales: (415) 528-7100
3801 East Bayshore Road             fax: (415) 934-2665
Palo Alto, California 94303 USA     http://www.barrnet.net

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 14:47:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Kimberly Smay <smay@lclark.edu>
Subject: re: 19th century supplies

I got my wireless cataog(PBS) yesterday. In it is "The Historical Supply 
Catalogue" by Alan Wellikoff. I know nothing about it and do not have an 
ISBN, but the discription says it has everything "from Victorian lighting 
to edwardian underwear". Sounds like an interesting source for you 19th 
century recreationist types out there.
Kimberly Smay

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 23:41:39 GMT
From: db-cos@westmore.demon.co.uk (David Brewer)
Subject: Re: Gloves as Protection for late 15 cent.

In message <v01510102acc680c8c8f3@[143.167.135.5]> Bill Hubbard writes:
> Replying to David Brewer's query on "Medieval gloves: any info?":

[...I'm replying a little "behind the loop" because I got placed on
the 'bounce' list; trans-atlantic routing problems I expect; pretty
ironic really, since Bill probably lives within a mile of me...]

> >I have never seen anything about gloves. Shoes?- yes. Shoes are
> >easy. I've done shoes. Gloves?
...
> But for military use? I suspect they may have come in during the
> Elizabethan era - I can't think of any illustrations or ref.s before that
> (but this list might well know better . . . ).

I'd never gone looking myself, A quick skeet through some handy books
shows most soldiers bare-handed, I think that the piccy of the 
Burgundian soldiers lined up, polearms at back, archers at front with
a line of stakes shows gloves. Archers are shown sometimes with the 
drawing-hand gloved (in one case with a three-fingered archery glove).

> May seem odd when you consider the vulnerability of hands that military
> gloves are not commonly represented in the medieval period, but the same
> thing applies to the Greek and Roman period: the evidence just doesn't seem
> to be there.

If we know they wore gloves (was there a guild of glovers? I know that
glovers had special leather cutting knives) and know that they were
pretty well shod, how likely is it that a man didn't own gloves and
how likely is he not to take/wear them on campaign? This is not an
especially warm/dry country; check your atlas... we're on a level with
Canada.

> >I am probably going to use leather, rather than cloth (these gloves
> >are to protect my finger from possible impact with fast-moving
> >steel, doesn't sound like much but it works).
> 
> If you want to have hand-protection, then metal gauntlets are your answer
> for late 15th cent. Europe. There are two forms: with seperate fingers of
> overlapping lames, and mitten-gauntlets (modern term), with the fingers
> protected by one to seven (or so) articulated plates stretching acoss the
> width of the fingers.

I believe the English were known for their own distinctive form of
plate gauntlet.

> These latter seem to have been (by manuscipt illustrations) common enough
> for the ordinary foot-soldier to wear. Most of them, however, are shown
> with bare hands.

I don't think I've ever seen gauntlets on a common soldier... please
give references!

> I have not seen any evidence of hand protection or gloves which are not
> metal gauntlets for the War of the Roses period. Metal gauntlets can be a
> bit more awkward to make than leather gloves, but I suspect they are the
> authentic answer.

Awkward? I should coco! I've seen enough plug-ugly homemade trash
gauntlets to last this lifetime, without making them m'self...
If I were a rich man I could just pop down the A61 to White Rose 
Armoury and get Dave to make me some, but I'm not.

- -- 
David Brewer

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 18:39:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Allan Terry <aterry@Teknowledge.COM>
Subject: Historic style hairdressing

Jamie,

I've had problems with a lot of hairdressers, who always want to cut my hair
very short with or without my consent.  I'm constantly explaining that I
need to leave it at least a medium length so I can attach hairpieces for
historic hairdressing (I do several eras of historic dance).  They think I'm
weird.  Anyway, my usual, sort-of-OK hairdresser went on maternity leave and
turned me over to another one at the same salon.  I was apprehensive, but
the new hairdresser turned out to be sympathetic because she went to school
in Los Angeles to study historic hairdressing and makeup.  She wanted to
work for the studios, but this didn't work out financially.  Anyway, I asked
whether she is willing to do historic hairdressing and she said yes.
However, she wants the client to give her an idea of what is wanted ahead of
time, so she can do research (unless, presumably, you have done the research
yourself).  I didn't go into this, but if you want hairpieces attached you
may have to provide them.  

The hairdresser's name is:

Liz Reznik
Topps Salon
420 3rd #203
Oakland, CA 
510/893-2587

Liz does work at the salon on Saturdays.

Fran Grimble

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 19:06:03 -0800
From: Heather Meadows <godiva@bing.apple.com>
Subject: Victorian fichus

I keep looking through at pictures of the most beautiful fichus
on victorian day dresses, and I'd like to put one on my dickens'
dress.  But I cant' seem to find any pictures that show
how they generally looked in back,
and without that I can't figure out how to attach it  
to a back lacing bodice..!

any advice would be helpful... thanks!

- -heather

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 02:20:15 -0500
From: GDresback@aol.com
Subject: Pith Helmets

Hey list,
       Does anyone have a good list of sources for Pith Helmets or Sun
Helmets? I am not interested in the stamped plastic kind, but in the real
cork type, espectially WWI era reproductions or slightly earlier.
           Thanks!
                     Glen Dresback
                     Norman, Oklahoma, USA.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 23:10:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Heather Rose Jones <hrjones@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: cotehardies etc. 

On Fri, 10 Nov 1995 julie_adams@corp.Cubic.COM wrote:

> On bias cuts and using wide fabric:  Based on how some original 
> garments are pieced together, I would hypothesize that they 
> sewed the widths of cloth together and then cut them out for 
> many of these bias-cut or very wide gored garments.  I am basing 

I would tend to phrase it "cut them out ... and sewed them together". If 
you are envisioning sewing lengths of uncut fabric together to form a 
single extra-wide piece and then cutting something out of that, I find it 
a bit unlikely from a practical point of view.

> this suggestion on the pattern layouts in Janet Arnold's Patterns 
> of Fashion, and some information that cloth was not normally 
> woven in very wide widths.  Does anyone have any primary 
> sources documenting this?

The cuts of the Dark Ages and medieval garments that I've been studying 
point to a "normal" fabric width ranging between 12-22 inches. (The very 
narrow apparent widths I've found have been for silk brocades -- wool and 
linen fabrics tend towards the higher end of the range.) This estimate is 
based on the maximum width of any piece, especially when corroborated by 
the same measurement appearing as the width of several pattern pieces in 
a garment. (Most of my sources don't specifically note selvedges -- which 
would be another good clue.) 

Heather Rose Jones

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 10:57:29 +0000 (GMT)
From: Dorothy Stein <dstein@sas.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: ISBN numbers

I'm a writer who doesn't know the ISBN numbers of my own books. They 
exist for someone else's convenience, not mine or the reader's. I 
say, don't get pressured into thinking the ISBN is a requirement for 
locating a book. It is the job of libraries, bookstores, etc. to make it 
easier, not harder, to find the book you want. That's why library 
associated software is set up with such choices as the first four letters 
of author and title, etc. You should be able to find a book with only the 
information about it that comes to mind.  

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 11:54:00 -0500
From: kl94ag@badger.ac.BrockU.CA (Kathleen Leggat)
Subject: Re: Gloves as Protection for late 15 cent.

According to _The Complete Encyclopedia of Arms & Weapons_ ed. Leonid
Tarassuk and Claude Blair:

Under "Gauntlets"

        Plate gauntlets replaced chain mail gauntlets worn over leather gloves.

        "In fact the oldest type of plate gauntlet on record, dating to the
early 14th century, replaced the mail glove and was similar to the
wide-cuffed leather gauntlet worn today by motorcyclists.  It, too, was made
of leather but covered with small riveted lames."

        The book goes on to discuss early 15th century articulated finger
gauntlets, then the fact that mitten gauntlets became popular from early
15th to the first half of the 16th.  They were always worn with a leather
glove.  

        "An important variation to emerge during the third quarter of the
15th century was the gauntlet with a particularly long pointed cuff.  

There was nothing under gloves, except a dueling glove of 16th and 17th
century Italy.


>If we know they wore gloves (was there a guild of glovers? I know that
>glovers had special leather cutting knives) and know that they were
>pretty well shod, how likely is it that a man didn't own gloves and
>how likely is he not to take/wear them on campaign? This is not an
>especially warm/dry country; check your atlas... we're on a level with
>Canada.

        Check with _Accessories of Dress_ by Lester & Morris.  This is out
of print, so if you can't find a copy, let me know and I'll check out the
one in our library.  (I've been so tempted to "lose" it and pay the
penalty...sigh...it's so hard to be honest!)

>> I have not seen any evidence of hand protection or gloves which are not
>> metal gauntlets for the War of the Roses period. Metal gauntlets can be a
>> bit more awkward to make than leather gloves, but I suspect they are the
>> authentic answer.
>
>Awkward? I should coco! I've seen enough plug-ugly homemade trash
>gauntlets to last this lifetime, without making them m'self...
>If I were a rich man I could just pop down the A61 to White Rose 
>Armoury and get Dave to make me some, but I'm not.


        Yes, but as costumers we have something the armourers want!  My
boyfriend got his articulated mitten gauntlets (excellent work) in exchange
for my researching and creating a Bedouin costume for the armourer.

        Bartering works!  


        Are you planning to wear armour?  If not, then a protected leather
gauntlet is probebly your best bet.  If there is real danger to your hands,
you might want to quilt the lining or sew small plates of metal or barrel
plastic onto the lining of the gauntlet.

        If you are wearing chain mail, then you are an earlier period in
combat, and can wear chain gloves over leather.  The book also said that
sometimes the gloves were attached to the arms of the body piece, with a
slit so you could put your hand out when not engaged.  (Sounds like our
Emily Post discussion doesn't it?)

        Sorry for the vagueries...I'm behind on my mail, so haven't read the
original postings.

        Kathleen (Catriona)

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 19:06:03 -0800
From: Heather Meadows <godiva@bing.apple.com>
Subject: Victorian fichus

I keep looking through at pictures of the most beautiful fichus
on victorian day dresses, and I'd like to put one on my dickens'
dress.  But I cant' seem to find any pictures that show
how they generally looked in back,
and without that I can't figure out how to attach it  
to a back lacing bodice..!

any advice would be helpful... thanks!

- -heather

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 09:06:18 -0500
From: sunfire@muskoka.com (Stephen & Krista Fraser)
Subject: Panne Velour

I would like to make a 13th century style gown to wear to SCA events etc.
My question is this...eventhough panne velour was not around then, would it
be a completely unpardonable sin to make the gown out of this material??  I
just really love the stuff and I think its so pretty, but would it be
terribly out of place?

Thanks in advance for your input!

Krista
sunfire@muskoka.com

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 09:06:20 -0500
From: sunfire@muskoka.com (Stephen & Krista Fraser)
Subject: Material for Tunic

 Hello again!  I'm wondering what type of material would be appropriate for
a wearable 12th Century English man's tunic...I don't want to spend tons of
money (as I don't have tons of money) but I'd like the right effect.  Also
what colours would be appropriate?

Krista
sunfire@muskoka.com

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 11:02:03 -0500
From: kl94ag@badger.ac.BrockU.CA (Kathleen Leggat)
Subject: quilting

        I went to my fabric store and showed my first attempt at machine
quilting to the clerk who was giving me advise about quilting.  He was
floored.  It seems that it is difficult to zig zag with metallic thread.
So, here's how to do it, along with how I'm quilting things.

        The thread I'm using is from Walmart.  It comes on a big spool, and
is called Fil Metallise.  It's 60% Polyester, 40% Metallic, and it is only
printed in French, leading me to believe its...French...(Wow, such deductive
powers!)

        I find it holds together much, much better than Guterman.

        I lowered my tension down to almost nothing...half-way between 1 and 0.

        For the quilting, I drew the lines on the backing fabric.  After
pinning all layers together, I machine basted in verticle lines several
inches apart in a contrasting thread.  I then machine basted along my
(diagonal) stitching lines with gold thread.  I pulled out the contrasting
basting, then stitched over my gold threads, right side up, with a
buttonhold stitch.  

        It looks great.

        Kathleen (Catriona)

------------------------------

End of H-Costume Digest V3 #248
*******************************

A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, send the command lines:

    unsubscribe h-costume-digest
    subscribe h-costume
    end

in the body of a message to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com.

Thanks and enjoy the list!
