From: owner-h-costume-digest (H-Costume Digest)
To: h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: H-Costume Digest V3 #250
Reply-To: h-costume
Sender: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Errors-To: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


H-Costume Digest        Tuesday, November 14 1995        Volume 3, Number 250

  Compilation copyright (C) 1995  Diane Barlow Close and Gretchen Miller
  Use in whole prohibited.  Individual articles are the property of
  the author.  Seek permission from that author before reprinting or
  quoting elsewhere.

Important Addresses:

  Send submissions to:   h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com (or reply to
			  this message).
  Adds/drops/archives:   majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com
  Real, live person:     h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Topics:
    Pith Helmets
    Re: knitting in Marian portraits
    Re: Material for Tunic
    Re: Material for Tunic 
    dressers  N  ressers 
    Looking for Lists
    Re: Panne Velour
    Re: children's clothes
    Knitting
    cleaning velvet
    Re: costume pattern request
    Re: Gloves as Protection for late 15 cent.
    Re: Looking for Lists
    circular knitting needles
    Re: Material for Tunic
    Re: costume pattern request
    Re: Material for Tunic
    Re: Material for Tunic

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 14:50:15 -0800
From: kondoa@ucs.orst.edu
Subject: Pith Helmets

	I found my "real" pith helmet at a large Asian import store.
It's some sort of bamboo or reed strips with a downcurving front 
brim.  I don't know if this is a "period" style, I just bought it 
for a "safari" costume.

						Alison

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 10:41:18 +1100 (EST)
From: Katrina Hunt <thehunts@canberra.DIALix.oz.au>
Subject: Re: knitting in Marian portraits

Believe it or not the Guernsey knitters (who knit in the round almost 
exclusively) knit a fake seam in the sides of their garments.  So maybe 
there isn't actually a seam in the bags just an illusional shaping.

Katrina

*******************************************************************************
*                                                                             *
* David and Katrina Hunt            |  thehunts@canberra.dialix.oz.au         *

* Stephen Aldred & Mathilde Adycote |  24 Edwards St Higgins ACT Australia
* Baron & Baroness Politarchopolis  |  Phone (06) 254 3059                    *
*                                                                             *
******************************************************************************* 

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 19:12:24 -0500
From: Sanni1@aol.com
Subject: Re: Material for Tunic

I've always liked old linen tablecloths.  You can usually find plain ones in
colors like russet, brown, forest green, gold, etc.  They are nicely worn and
really soft.  Also, linen is certainly a period fabric.  I've had one for
over 10 years--it's the most comfortable thing in my closet.  Try estate
sales and junk shops for good deals.
Sanni

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 17:54:24 PST
From: julie_adams@corp.Cubic.COM
Subject: Re: Material for Tunic 

You could always dye the linen tablecloths if you can only find 
white....

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Nov 95 17:48:53 PST
From: DGC3%Rates%FAR@go50.comp.pge.com
Subject: dressers  N  ressers 

I have two more names to contribute for historically informed hairdressers
in the San Francisco East Bay area. Both are also very good with
contemporary dos, dyes, and perms. And they both work Saturdays.

Lora Trimble at Hairshapers Club, 179 West Calavaras Blvd in Milpitas,
408/263-4357. Lora is a costumer herself and will understand the
vocabulary. She can also give you an otherworldly fantasy look. Lora
is a regular on the "killer hair panel" given by the Greater Bay Area
Costumers Guild.

Marjorie Wagner at New York, N.Y., 6208 Claremont Ave, Berkeley
510/945-6463.  Marjorie has been doing my hair for nearly 20 years, as
well as the hair of many of my friends and relations.  When our Bay Area
English Regency Society put on an Assembly in 1990, she did sets and
comb-outs for hours before the Grand Ball.  Marjorie is not a history
buff, but she can look at a picture and make something similar happen
to your hair using modern technology. She enjoys the creativity of doing
historic hairdos.

Be sure to tell them in advance what you want, so they block out
sufficient time. Bring lots of pins, ornaments, and hair pieces-- more
than you might think you need -- as you'll be wearing them home.

Danine

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danine Cozzens				Internet: dgc3@pge.com
Pacific Gas and Electric Company	San Francisco, CA
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 00:27:04 -0500
From: Damienne01@aol.com
Subject: Looking for Lists

Hello,

I hope you will excuse this intrusion on historical costume discussion.

I am looking for e-mail lists for re-enactment/living history/etc. groups and
was hoping that some of you good folks might be able to point me in the
direction(s).

Thank you very much for your help.

Damienne01@aol.com for Rick Howard

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 23:01:33 -0800
From: fishcat@hooked.net (Trystan L. Bass)
Subject: Re: Panne Velour

sunfire@muskoka.com (Stephen & Krista Fraser) wrote:
>I would like to make a 13th century style gown to wear to SCA events etc.
>My question is this...eventhough panne velour was not around then, would it
>be a completely unpardonable sin to make the gown out of this material??  I
>just really love the stuff and I think its so pretty, but would it be
>terribly out of place?

Now here's a voice from the historically-challenged (to counter all the
"no, it's not period" posts)--

===>  Go for it!  <====

I know the fabric of which you speak and it is *lovely,*  often comes in
rich dark colors, and hangs beautifully on the body.  I'm not in the SCA,
but I've seen similar fabrics worn at their events, so it doesn't seem too
taboo.

And just think, the worst thing anyone can say is that your gown looks like
the French princess' gowns in "Braveheart"!!!

 fishcat@hooked.net      @->->-- Trystan L. Bass --<-<-@     TrystBass@aol.com
                                        http://www.hooked.net/users/fishcat/

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 02:12:12 -0500
From: NeenH@aol.com
Subject: Re: children's clothes

My era is 1775-85.  Here's what I know about kids' clothes:

Boys and girls mostly dressed like the adults.  Baby boys and girls 
mostly dressed alike.  They were considered babies until they were 7ish.  
At Plimouth Plantation one woman told me that her son was breeched when 
his father declared him fit to start helping with the serious work, at 7 
yrs.  (1st person interpretation is great, isn't it?).

My kids wear just shifts during the summer, and simple frock dresses over 
them when it's colder, with sashes and aprons, depending on what we are 
doing, and hats, of course.

Kids clothes get constructed so that they are adjustable for growth, 
tucks at hems and overlapping vertical closings that are tied or pinned.  
This must have been true before the 18th C, too! 

Colleen Humphreys

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 07:39:29 -0500
From: Gary Stephens <garys@flexnet.com>
Subject: Knitting

>On Sun, 12 Nov 1995, Stella Nemeth wrote:

>> Until about 1970 no one was making this kind of shirt: one that had NO
>> seams.  If you look at the history of modern knitting, it took us about 130
>> to 150 years to go from the knit rectangles and put them together methods of
>> making a sweater to the make it all in one piece using circular needles
>> method.  So the fact that she is doing it right is rather important.

And then Heather Rose Jones replied:

>I rather wonder if there is a typo somewhere in the above. Certainly
>people were making seamless knit garments using either multiple
>double-pointed needles or circular needles prior to about 1970. I know
>from personal observation that my own grandmother was doing it in the
>early '60s. My impression has been that the technique of knitting flat
>"pattern pieces" and then sewing them together is the one that is quite
>recent (and to some extent a response to the tragic loss of complex
>knitting skills in the general population <wink>). Now I'm a bit curious
>as to what you _meant_ to say in the above.

        Might I point out that socks have been knitted in a circular
fashion for a very long time? My greatgrandmother knitted umpteen socks for
the WWI fellows in this fashion. And I'm sure her greatgrandmother did as
well, as socks have been tubes for a very, very long time. If they could do
it for socks, surely these thrifty women could do it for shirts?

Lorina Stephens
garys@flexnet.com

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 07:39:24 -0500
From: Gary Stephens <garys@flexnet.com>
Subject: cleaning velvet

Catriona Stewart wrote:

>So, how *does* one clean velvet?  When I mentioned that I was planning to
>wash the velvet I'd bought for my 12th Night garb (cheap velvet at
>Woolworth's, but it looks okay) before I cut it, one of my friends nearly
>had a fit and told me that you *never* wash velvet.  Must I dry clean
>then?  (Rather expensive, I'd like to avoid this if possible).

        I have washed both cotton and polyester velvets in the machine on
delicate cycle, cold wash/cold rinse, and machine dried on a permanent
press setting for years without harm. Just be sure to use a delicate cycle
to wash, so that the spin action of the washer doesn't crease the velvet,
and to use a permanent press cycle on the dryer so that the cooling action
releases any wrinkles. I never have to iron. Just take straight out of the
dryer and hang. Honest.

Lorina Stephens
garys@flexnet.com

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1995 12:42:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Rhodry <rsaylor@scs.unr.edu>
Subject: Re: costume pattern request

> Failing that, AHENCK@american.edu (Anita F. Henck), per a post on
> alt.sewing, just inherited a couple hundred patterns dating from the
> period. You might want to email her and see if she has one.
> 
> snip
> 
> At 12:37 AM 11/9/95, David Dill wrote:
> > Hi!  I am looking for a pattern to make a 1969-looking
> > suede coat with fringe, such as was worn by many
> > hippies of the day.
> 

You may want to check your local thrift stores.  They often have patterns 
and as far as I can tell, none of them are from the last two decades.

 - Rhodry
Member Life East of Auburn, Principality of Cynagua

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 08:16:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Rhodry <rsaylor@scs.unr.edu>
Subject: Re: Gloves as Protection for late 15 cent.

On Wed, 8 Nov 1995, Bill Hubbard wrote:
> 
> If you want to have hand-protection, then metal gauntlets are your answer
> for late 15th cent. Europe. There are two forms: with seperate fingers of
> overlapping lames, and mitten-gauntlets (modern term), with the fingers
> protected by one to seven (or so) articulated plates stretching acoss the
> width of the fingers.

> These latter seem to have been (by manuscipt illustrations) common enough
> for the ordinary foot-soldier to wear. Most of them, however, are shown
> with bare hands.

Owning a pair of mitten-gauntlets, I can assert that you will want foam 
padding and leather gloves.  I use thin leather gloves in mine and 
replace them once a year.  There will be spots in the gauntlets that 
"bite" your hands.  This is why you will want the gloves.  Because of 
these factors, I have trouble believing that soldiers, knights, whatever 
you want to call them did NOT wear something in them.  However, I have 
not done any research on the topic.

> I have not seen any evidence of hand protection or gloves which are not
> metal gauntlets for the War of the Roses period. Metal gauntlets can be a
> bit more awkward to make than leather gloves, but I suspect they are the
> authentic answer.

In the states there are many armours who could make these for you.  I 
would image the same applies in the UK.

 - Rhodry

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:07:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Karen Mercedes <mercedes@access.digex.net>
Subject: Re: Looking for Lists

I'm not sure about mailing lists.  There is a news group called 
alt.living-history (or alt.history-living...I can't recall which).  You 
may want to check it out.  It seems to be equally populated by sca-ers 
and Civil War re-enacters.  Also, if you're interested in military 
re-enactments, you should check out alt.war and soc.history.military, 
which get a number of announcements of re-enactment events throughout the 
year.

Karen Mercedes
mercedes@access.digex.net

+--------------------------------------------------+
| You know, it never seems to occur to people that |
| a man might just want to write a piece of music. |
|                        -- Ralph Vaughan Williams |
+--------------------------------------------------+

=====

On Tue, 14 Nov 1995 Damienne01@aol.com wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I hope you will excuse this intrusion on historical costume discussion.
> 
> I am looking for e-mail lists for re-enactment/living history/etc. groups and
> was hoping that some of you good folks might be able to point me in the
> direction(s).
> 
> Thank you very much for your help.
> 
> Damienne01@aol.com for Rick Howard
> 

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:32:18 -0600
From: reaves@tuvok.marian.edu (Anne Reaves)
Subject: circular knitting needles

Sharron Fina thought that circular needles were introduced in the 1970s. In
Rutt's History of Knitting, find the speculation that the Scandinavians
introduced circular needles, but the fact that they were advertised in
England in 1928.   Whoever invented them must have done so prior to that
date.

Yes, knitting in the round does have a "side seam" because it is spiral,
not truly circular.   In plain knitting this is not very visible, but it is
in color work or elaborately patterned designs.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:45:53 -0500 (EST)
From: pursel darlene elizabeth 673761TP1 <darlene.pursel@sheridanc.on.ca>
Subject: Re: Material for Tunic

If you are going for an authentic look, wool was the main fabric of the 
day, or very heavy cotton.  Any colors used in the 12th century were 
those that could be gotten from nature, lots of browns, greens, greys, etc.

Darlene

On Sun, 12 Nov 1995, Stephen & Krista Fraser wrote:

>  Hello again!  I'm wondering what type of material would be appropriate for
> a wearable 12th Century English man's tunic...I don't want to spend tons of
> money (as I don't have tons of money) but I'd like the right effect.  Also
> what colours would be appropriate?
> 
> Krista
> sunfire@muskoka.com
> 
> 

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 16:48:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Karen Mercedes <mercedes@access.digex.net>
Subject: Re: costume pattern request

As I posted before (and am still awaiting any response), I have one of 
these jackets and will be happy to sell it.  Then whoever buys it can 
either use it (and not have to make another), or deconstruct it.

Let me know if you're interested.

Karen Mercedes
mercedes@access.digex.net

+--------------------------------------------------+
| You know, it never seems to occur to people that |
| a man might just want to write a piece of music. |
|                        -- Ralph Vaughan Williams |
+--------------------------------------------------+

=====

On Sat, 11 Nov 1995, Rhodry wrote:

> > Failing that, AHENCK@american.edu (Anita F. Henck), per a post on
> > alt.sewing, just inherited a couple hundred patterns dating from the
> > period. You might want to email her and see if she has one.
> > 
> > snip
> > 
> > At 12:37 AM 11/9/95, David Dill wrote:
> > > Hi!  I am looking for a pattern to make a 1969-looking
> > > suede coat with fringe, such as was worn by many
> > > hippies of the day.
> > 
> 
> You may want to check your local thrift stores.  They often have patterns 
> and as far as I can tell, none of them are from the last two decades.
> 
>  - Rhodry
> Member Life East of Auburn, Principality of Cynagua
> 
> 

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 17:15:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Susan Carroll-Clark <sclark@epas.utoronto.ca>
Subject: Re: Material for Tunic

greetings!

Darlene posted, regarding 12th century dress--

>
> If you are going for an authentic look, wool was the main fabric of the
> day, or very heavy cotton.

Wool, yes.  Cotton, no.  Heavy cotton can be an OK substitute for wool
if economy is desired.

> Any colors used in the 12th century were
> those that could be gotten from nature, lots of browns, greens,
>greys, etc.

Again--yes and no.  Just how wide the available colour palette was is
sometimes grossly underestimated--at least for the upper classes.  Mordants
and exotic dyestuffs can create some pretty spectacular colours, and even
basic natural dyes can create vivid blues, wine-purples and brick reds.
Colours did tend to be less brilliant than some of those obtainable today
with chemical dyes, but please, don't think you're limited to "earth tones".
If you want a further hint, have a look at the Bayeaux Tapestry.  Many of
the colours of wool therein are quite vivid, despite over 900 years of aging.

cheers!
Susan Carroll-Clark
sclark@epas.utoronto.ca
  

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 09:25:49 +1100 (EST)
From: Katrina Hunt <thehunts@canberra.DIALix.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Material for Tunic

On Tue, 14 Nov 1995, pursel darlene elizabeth 673761TP1 wrote:

> If you are going for an authentic look, wool was the main fabric of the 
> day, or very heavy cotton.  Any colors used in the 12th century were 
> those that could be gotten from nature, lots of browns, greens, greys, etc.

Not to mention bright blues (from woad and indigo etc), reds (from madder 
etc), yellows (from saffron, onions etc), purple (well if you were very 
rich).  Bright pink has also been around at least since then.

As for materials.  We live in interesting times.  For us cotton is very 
cheap, for 12th century people it was very expensive.  Flax, on the 
other hand, was easily grown, spun and woven, so linen was more common.  
Silk was also readily available at this time as people returned from the 
crusades and the trade routes opened up.  Wool, of course, was readily 
available too.

I would be inclined to go with your budget, just stick to natural fibres.

Katrina
*******************************************************************************
*                                                                             *
* David and Katrina Hunt            |  thehunts@canberra.dialix.oz.au         *

* Stephen Aldred & Mathilde Adycote |  24 Edwards St Higgins ACT Australia
* Baron & Baroness Politarchopolis  |  Phone (06) 254 3059                    *
*                                                                             *
******************************************************************************* 

------------------------------

End of H-Costume Digest V3 #250
*******************************

A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, send the command lines:

    unsubscribe h-costume-digest
    subscribe h-costume
    end

in the body of a message to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com.

Thanks and enjoy the list!
