From: owner-h-costume-digest (H-Costume Digest)
To: h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: H-Costume Digest V4 #40
Reply-To: h-costume
Sender: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Errors-To: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


H-Costume Digest        Wednesday, February 21 1996        Volume 4, Number 40

  Compilation copyright (C) 1995  Diane Barlow Close and Gretchen Miller
  Use in whole prohibited.  Individual articles are the property of
  the author.  Seek permission from that author before reprinting or
  quoting elsewhere.

Important Addresses:

  Send submissions to:   h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com (or reply to
			  this message).
  Adds/drops/archives:   majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com
  Real, live person:     h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Topics:
    Re: Skirt placket and fastening 
    The minuet
    Re: software demos
    Tangentally-Related Question
    Cleaning fur
    Re: ATHE ONLINE: Costume history query
    fittingly demo
    Mid Victorians
    Re: Skirt placket and fastening
    Gloves in the ballroom
    Re: Any other mid-Victorians
    Re: Skirt placket and fastening 
    Re: fittingly demo
    Raised arms in dance
    Bongrace and lappets
    BIG snaps
    Corset web page
    Big snaps = Wopper Poppers
    Re: fittingly sew demo
    RE: Big snaps = Wopper Poppers

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 13:40:25 -0500
From: Elizabeth Lear <eliz@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Skirt placket and fastening 

>I am making a skirt to go over a hoop, and I am pleating it to a =
>waistband.  What is the best way to handle the closure in the back.  I =
>don't want to use a zipper, of course, and would like to use some sort =
>of hook and eye/trouser fastener on it.  How do I prevent it from =
>gaping, etc., etc.,?

I've never had a problem using hooks and eyes on the waistband.  If
you're using enough fabric (I use about 4 yards, usually), there's enough
overlap to hide the gap.  And you can always put another hook and eye
on the gap to hold it closed.

And remember you only need enough of a gap to get the skirt on over
your head and down to your waist.  It shouldn't be too much.

							...eliz

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:09:29 -0500
From: Gaelscot@aol.com
Subject: The minuet

Mea culpa! Of course dancers touched during the minuet, I dont' know where my
mind was when I wrote that. My point was (or should have been) that while
dancers touched hands during the minuet, they spent major portions of the
dance dancing alone. The minuet was not a "couple dance" as we think of them
today.   Today's standard "ballroom position" with the woman in the man's
arms was unknown and, when introduced, considered shocking in some circles.
Sorry for the error.

Gail Finke/gaelscot@aol.com

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:12:16 -0500
From: deirdre@sover.net (Deirdre)
Subject: Re: software demos

At 12:56 PM 2/20/96, Robin Findlay wrote:
>I called the numbers and they are out of buisness.
>
>Best Wishes

Is there an email address for them? I might want to negotiate carrying on
with the Mac product since I was intending to do same.

 _Deirdre  <deirdre@sover.net> http://www.sover.net/~deirdre

The net can't be controlled, but they can sure mess it up trying.
        It will be like hemp:  the yarn and the paper are gone, but the nasty
uses linger on.
- -- Joy Beeson (jbeeson@globalone.net) from a post to the knit list on 2/17/96

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 96 13:48:00 CST
From: "Lassman, Linda" <LASSMAN@bldgdafoe.lan1.umanitoba.ca>
Subject: Tangentally-Related Question

This is only tangentally related to historic costuming, but does anyone know 
the name of Buster Brown's dog?

Please just e-mail me directly!  My apologies for taking up bandwidth on 
this one!

 - Linda Lassman
  Winnipeg, Manitoba
  lassman@bldgdafoe.lan1.umanitoba.ca

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 11:51:56 +0000
From: "Leslie Helms" <leslieh@canfield.com>
Subject: Cleaning fur

Nea- 

   You'll get many better responses, I'm sure, but your question 
reminded me of an old method I haven't tried; perhaps someone 
has and can report on it.  Corn meal can be rubbed into the fur and 
thoroughly brushed and shaken out.  The reference (forgotten) is an 
old one, so I suspect that the meal they had in mind would not be the 
uniform, defatted sort from the supermarket.  I'd try the co-op or 
health food store versions, with irregular grind and a fairly high 
fat content.  And, of course, keep any moisture out of the process!  
I believe that the combination of starch and fiber are intended to 
abrade away dirt, and the corn oil to recondition the fur.

Leslie

leslieh@canfield.com

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:55:31 -0600 (CST)
From: Teresa Shannon <tws@csd.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: ATHE ONLINE: Costume history query

> >
> >Does anyone know of any current research or resources on British and/or
> >European sumptuary laws as pertaining to costume history?
> >Our most current text is copyrighted 1928.  We need responses ASAP!  Please
> >e-mail to thjoa@ttacs1.ttu.edu.
> >Thank you.
> >
> >
> Kat
> Katherine L. Rodman
> afn25136@afn.org
> Gainesville, FL
> 
> "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to
> be amused."
> 

You must be referring to Frances Elizabeth Baldwins Sumptuary Legislation 
in Medieval England (not exact title).  I am afraid while there are 
several scholars working with it, a female professor whose name I have somewhere here just 
did a paper at a Stanford conference, and there is someone at Georgetown, 
but no work has been published recently that is as seminal as that one.  
I have been referenced also to a Victorian, but compared to Baldwin, well 
the only thing left that I use is actual english parlimentary and leet 
jurisdiction, and agricultural records of import and exports relating how 
expensive comparative colors and fabric types were.  If you are 
interested, I can go home and do some hunting.  But the answer is yes and 
no, there are studies, no texts to compare with Baldwins that have been 
published up to a few years ago that I am aware of.  If you get any other 
responses, please I should be interested.

Caveat:  I only look for 14th century England, there is much information 
on Elizabethan sumptuary legislation that is contained elsewhere.

Prof. Lynn Laufenberg at Cornell University gave the paper on english 
sumptuary and may have better sources than I can give, track her down.

Teresa
Univ of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:38:18 -0800
From: bd927@scn.org (Susan Courney)
Subject: fittingly demo

Greetings:

It is still possible to download the fittingly sew demo
from www.shareware.com (as of last week).  If you don't
do web browsering, but can ftp things I'll try to
figure out an address.  If you let me know.

Susan

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 15:05:58 -0800
From: kondoa@ucs.orst.edu
Subject: Mid Victorians

	How "mid" is "mid Victorian'?  I like just about 
everything except the 1860's.  Hoopskirts just don't 
appeal to me.  I really love the 1830's, with the really 
outrageous, overdecorated gowns, but most of that is just
barley pre-victorian.  Anyone else like 1830's?

						Alison

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 17:13:26 -0800
From: gwjchris@ix.netcom.com (Bill and Glenna Christen )
Subject: Re: Skirt placket and fastening

You wrote: 
>
>I am making a skirt to go over a hoop, and I am pleating it to a 
>waistband.  What is the best way to handle the closure in the back. 
>How do I prevent it from gaping, etc., etc.,?

If the skirt is attached to the bodice as most skirts tended to be back 
in the hoop skirt era, the skirt would open in the front slightly to 
one side of center in a "dog leg" manner from the center front bodice 
opening.  The way the skirts kept from gapping is that the overlap was 
very deep, and the pleats laid very smooth.  They had a lot of fabric 
at the top to play with, even after they started goring their skirts in 
the early 1860's.

Glenna Jo Christen
LHS, LSFS, MSAS & HSP
gwjchris@ix.netcom.com

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 17:27:45 -0800
From: gwjchris@ix.netcom.com (Bill and Glenna Christen )
Subject: Gloves in the ballroom

You wrote: 
>
>As a matter of fact, the waltz was considered shocking when it was first 
>introduced.  Men were told to wear gloves so that their hand would not be in 
>direct contact with the woman's back.  If they didn't have gloves, they were 
>told to at least use a handkerchief.

Gloves were required not because the dance was shocking (although it was at 
first, IMHO that's partly why it caught on :-)!), but more importantly a sweaty 
hand would very likely mark or stain the lady's silk gown.  The requirement for 
wearing white gloves in the ballroom still holds true today, at least for very 
formal occasions.

Glenna Jo Christen
LHS, LSFS, MSAS & HSP
gwjchris@ix.netcom.com
>

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 13:33:25 +1100 (EST)
From: Fiona Thorne <fthorne@socs.uts.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: Any other mid-Victorians

LuAnn,

I am interested in c1800-1901, so I am interested in your era. I just 
don't get time to make much. I have just sort of completed an 1860s era 
dress, which I made as a bodice and top. 

(Erin, thanks for all the help - the ruffle worked out well).

It's in a wearable state at present, but needs a few ends finished off 
(eg the concealed button holes are only cut, not shown). As usual, I 
was putting the buttons on as I cooked the lunch to take to the function 
that I needed the dress for. And now I need a new blue bonnet to go with 
the dress.

Fiona

On Mon, 19 Feb 1996 LuAnnMason@aol.com wrote:

> Are there any other mid-Victorian costumers out there?  I'm feeling a bit
> lost on the board!  :)  I just thought I'd see if there were any other
> "lurkers" like me out there....
> 
> LuAnn
> 
> 

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 22:24:40 -0500
From: NeaDods@aol.com
Subject: Re: Skirt placket and fastening 

I always solved the gapping placket problem by putting a hook on each end of
the waistband overlap.  Ascii drawings are not my forte, but let me try...
the X's represent hooks, and the lines are, of course, the two meeting ends
of the waistband.

    -----------
       X            X
      ---------------

For the really heavy skirts, I also hook the back of the skirt to the blouse
or (if I'm wearing one) the bottom of the vest.  Taking the weight off the
waistband is one way to eliminate stress on the placket.

Nea
neadods@aol.com

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 22:19:34 -0600 (CST)
From: Kerri Potratz <kpotratz@sunflowr.usd.edu>
Subject: Re: fittingly demo

Let me know what you think of Fittingly Sew--I tried the demo, but I'm 
scared to actually buy the program if they are making leaps and bounds in 
improvements on it.   This really has me curious.

btw anyone hiring a costume tech with a BFA to be completed in May?

*Kerri Potratz**University of South Dakota*		    /   /\   \
*Kpotratz@sunfish.usd.edu				      \	\/ /
								\/
==If I be waspish, best beware my sting!==  Shrew, II.i

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 20:37:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Allan Terry <aterry@neon.Teknowledge.COM>
Subject: Raised arms in dance

Yes, most physical partner contact in 18th-century dance was limited to
taking hands, in both couple and country dances.  However, there is an
improvisational dance called the allemande described by Guillaume in 1769,
and by Dubois in an undated manual usually assumed to be from the 1770s.
The allemande was popular from at least this early till the end of the 18th
century.  It may have lasted into the Regency period; we have Regency
manuals with music for the allemande but it's not clear what was being done
to it.  Anyway, the allemande is probably derived from the German landler
and consists of simple steps--rather folky for the 18th century--and many
improvised "passes" with the arms.  I've done and taught it, but in modern
clothes.  

Guillaume's manual has plates of some arm positions.  The arms are often
raised well over the head and bent into some rather contorted positions even
though both partners are wearing tight sleeves.  I only have a xerox of the
manual.  Judging from it the clothes were strained under the armpits and the
sleeves were wrinkled.  But this didn't stop the dancers from using high arm
positions.  The last plate shows a face-to-face position with a hold similar
to the Victorian waltz.  (Unfortunately the only pictures I have from the
Dubois manual are redrawings.)

One notable aspect of the Regency waltz (actually the first waltz manual I
know of has four distinct waltzes, in terms of steps and tempos) is that the
dancers were expected to progress through a variety of arm positions (and
possibly through all the four waltzes).  The waltz is also supposed to be
derived from the landler.  But I've often wondered whether it was instead
derived directly from or influenced by the allemande.

The waltz was done in Paris in the 1790s.  We don't have any 1790s
instructions in our library, but we do have French pictures of couples who
appear to be waltzing.

Fran Grimble

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 10:54:16 -0600 (CST)
From: "Alison Hoyer" <alihoyer@inet.uni-c.dk>
Subject: Bongrace and lappets

I think this is my first message to this list, so I'll introduce myself
first: I am Australian, and my Danish husband and I perform with the dance
group Anello, which is based in Copenhagen, and expertly and charmingly led
by Jorgen Schou-Pederson. We aim to recreate court dances, our period is
1575-1610, and we make our costumes as authentic as possible.

I am seeking information on a headgear illustration from the book _The Mode
in Hats and Headdress_ by R.Turner Wilcox, Scribner & Sons, NY 1946.

Page 105, lower right corner: A black velvet bongrace with pleated black
taffeta lappets with pearl pendants, Italian, 1583.

 Can anybody tell me
where to find other illusrations of this style, or where the painting is
located? I know I have seen a better illustration  but it was years ago,
studying history, and that was in Australia, so I can't exactly go and find
it! Is the correct term for what I am asking provenance (sp) ?
                    In a fog of barely-remembered history,
                                                  Alison Hoyer, Denmark.

                                                <alihoyer@inet.uni-c.dk>

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 02:05:50 +0000
From: "Leslie Helms" <leslieh@canfield.com>
Subject: BIG snaps

Purists, please cover your eyes for a moment . . .
 
Upholstery shops, outdoor equipment dealers, boating shops, and 
canvas suppliers are all sources of heavy-duty snaps.   You may find 
they have some surprising theatrical costuming aids!

I'd appreciate someone reposting the address for the corset page; I 
can't find it!

Leslie
leslieh@canfield.com

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 09:24 CST
From: tallison@mcs.com (Tim Allison)
Subject: Corset web page

>
>Everyone,
>
>I'm planning to put together a list of resources specifically for
>elizabethan costuming and add it to the corset web page.
What is the address, please?
Thanks
Carol Mitchell

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 10:50:49 est
From: Hilary_Oak_at_SLU1@ccmaillink.stlawu.edu
Subject: Big snaps = Wopper Poppers

Ah yes, 
They are not period correct, but then neither is the sewing machine for most 
time frames of fashion! In the theatre biz we call them Wopper Poppers and could
no more live without them than (gasp) Velcro!

Once again, two of my favorite sources for such things are:

Baer Fabrics in Louisville, KY (800) 769-7778 and

Richard the Thread in L.A., CA. (800) 473-4997

and there is the good old standby for theatrical notions:
Greenberg & Hammer in NYC, NY. (800) 955-5135

You can buy them by the dozen, by the gross, or the great-gross at most of these
places. As always, Tell 'em I sent ya!

Regards, - Hilary Oak

_

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 10:29:21 -0600 (CST)
From: Deb <BADDORF@warner.fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: fittingly sew demo

I liked Fittingly Sew very much, as a program.   Doing
design on the computer is neat (I'm a computer person).

Doing design AT ALL however,  is not my forte.  I decided
I was better off using one marked up paper pattern that already
fit,  and just altering it slightly.  So I didn't buy the
Fittingly Sew program.

And, we've had reports that one CANNOT buy it any longer.
The phone numbers have been called, and the company says
that it is closed.   It would be nice if it would reopen,
but ....      don't decide NOW that you want to buy it!

Deb Baddorf               baddorf@fnal.gov

------------------------------

Date: 21 Feb 1996 11:54:35 -0500
From: "Witt Meggan" <witt_meggan@msmail.muohio.edu>
Subject: RE: Big snaps = Wopper Poppers

How big are these snaps? We use some that are approx. 3/4" in diameter. Can
you get them bigger than that?
_______________________________________________________________________________
To: zorro@netdepot.com
Cc: h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com
From: Hilary_Oak_at_SLU1@ccmaillink.stlawu.edu on Wed,Feb 21,1996 11:10 AM
Subject: Big snaps = Wopper Poppers
RFC Header:Received: by msmail.muohio.edu with SMTP;21 Feb 1996 11:10:24
- -0500
Received: from sgigate.SGI.COM by rose.muohio.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA89698; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 11:04:30 -0500
Received: from lunch.engr.sgi.com by sgigate.sgi.com via ESMTP
(950911.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH825/940406.SGI)
	 id IAA12023; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 08:01:21 -0800
Received: by lunch.engr.sgi.com (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/951211.SGI.AUTO)
	 id HAA09416; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 07:52:08 -0800
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 96 10:50:49 est
From: Hilary_Oak_at_SLU1@ccmaillink.stlawu.edu
Message-Id: <9601218249.AA824928727@ccmaillink.stlawu.edu>
To: zorro@netdepot.com
Cc: h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Big snaps = Wopper Poppers
Sender: owner-h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

Ah yes, 
They are not period correct, but then neither is the sewing machine for most 
time frames of fashion! In the theatre biz we call them Wopper Poppers and
could
no more live without them than (gasp) Velcro!

Once again, two of my favorite sources for such things are:

Baer Fabrics in Louisville, KY (800) 769-7778 and

Richard the Thread in L.A., CA. (800) 473-4997

and there is the good old standby for theatrical notions:
Greenberg & Hammer in NYC, NY. (800) 955-5135

You can buy them by the dozen, by the gross, or the great-gross at most of
these
places. As always, Tell 'em I sent ya!

Regards, - Hilary Oak

_

------------------------------

End of H-Costume Digest V4 #40
******************************

A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, send the command lines:

    unsubscribe h-costume-digest
    subscribe h-costume
    end

in the body of a message to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com.

Thanks and enjoy the list!
