From: owner-h-costume-digest (H-Costume Digest)
To: h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: H-Costume Digest V4 #55
Reply-To: h-costume
Sender: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Errors-To: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


H-Costume Digest          Thursday, March 7 1996          Volume 4, Number 55

  Compilation copyright (C) 1996  Diane Barlow Close and Gretchen Miller
  Use in whole prohibited.  Individual articles are the property of
  the author.  Seek permission from that author before reprinting or
  quoting elsewhere.

Important Addresses:

  Send submissions to:   h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com (or reply to
			  this message).
  Adds/drops/archives:   majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com
  Real, live person:     h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Topics:
    Costume exhibit catalog
    Ren fair costumes
    Re: Short hair for women?
    RenFaires
    Re: Knights Templar or.../ Armor
    gloves and gaiters
    RE: bosom fashions (was RenFaires)
    Empress Elisabeth
    Re: Ren fair costumes
    re: Washing Linen
    Wallets and Pocketbooks?
    Where did the man's tie come from?
    Re: Egyption clothing ideas
    Costume Web Page At Last
    Where ties come from....
    Re: Wallets and Pocketbooks?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 22:53:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Allan Terry <aterry@neon.Teknowledge.COM>
Subject: Costume exhibit catalog

A friend's inquiry just reminded me to post this message.

If anyone is interested in buying the costume exhibit catalog _From the Waltz
to the Tango: Fashion in Bohemia Volume 2, 1870-1914_, you can get it very
easily from the Museum of Decorative Arts in Prague.  Their address is:

Kunstgewerbe Museum
Ulice 17, Listopadu 2
110 01 Praha 1
Czech Republic

I wrote to them in English.  They promptly (given surface mail time) sent
the catalog and an invoice arrived a couple days later, to be paid in
dollars.  They charged $26 for the catalog and shipping together--not
unreasonable as foreign catalogs go.

The catalog focuses on women's clothes, with some dance clothes and
pictures, but really doesn't say much about dance.  Most of the
illustrations are black-and-white period engravings.  A few are color photos
of surviving clothes.  The language is a rather charming translation by
someone not entirely fluent in English.  My favorite rendering is the title
of a tailoring magazine as "The Golden Bottom."  According to my husband,
who speaks some Russian, this is a literal translation from a proverbial
expression; the title means something more like "The Tailor's Gold Mine."

The museum says volume 1, which covers fashion from 1780 to 1870, is
entirely sold out but they can sell a xerox for approximately $12.  They
plan an exhibit on Czech fashion from 1914 to 1939 from October through
December 1996, and this will be accompanied by another book.  Also, they are
negotiating with the Prague publisher Olympia to edit a seven-volume history
of Czech fashion.

Fran Grimble

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 23:11:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Elizabeth Fox <crow@well.com>
Subject: Ren fair costumes

The costumes Fran Grimble describes for Ren Faire are very familiar to 
me.  And I agree with the original poster about the incredible 
breastworks on some of the participants.
  
I've done fairs for years yet realize I don't know much about what 
authentic peasant dress would be like.  Partly it's because there aren't 
many paintings of the peasantry, as there are of the nobles.

Anyway, I'm curious if you or anyone could describe a prototypical 
peasant costume that might be more accurate than the ones that have 
become the standards.

Elizabeth
Who is looking for HTML or tech writing work in the Bay Area

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 23:29:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Heather Rose Jones <hrjones@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: Short hair for women?

On Wed, 6 Mar 1996, laura yungblut wrote:

> Greetings from a long-time lurker!  I teach Medieval History (among 
> other things) and a student asked me if I knew of any periods or 
> places where women wore their hair short -- that short hair was the 
> fashion, not an aberration.  I told her that nuns throughout the 
> centuries before our own shaved their heads and that women would 
> sometimes cut their hair for medical reasons, but that I knew of no 
> examples before the early 20th century of short hair as a *fashion* 
> for women.  Does anyone know of any examples/references?

I know of one reference. Giraldus Cambrensis, in his late 12th century 
"Description of Wales" says of the Welsh people of his day, "Both the men 
and the women cut their hair short and shape it round their ears and 
eyes." (He said it in Latin, of course.) I know of no contemporary 
pictorial sources that would confirm or contradict this statement, but 
Giraldus was a first-hand observer and seems to be generally reliable in 
this sort of observation.

Heather Rose Jones

------------------------------

Date: 07 Mar 96 09:57:00 GMT
From: Mrs C S Yeldham <csy20688@ggr.co.uk>
Subject: RenFaires

As someone involved in Living History (in England, 16th century) I am at
least as obsessive about accuracy as the worst of SCA, if not more so!

I thought Jennifer was asking a question (OK fairly bluntly), and I shall
take her at her word and answer it (below)!

Part of the point of Jennifer's mailing was that they had done so much
work, and still got the neckline wrong.  The neckline sounds
physiologically impossible (above the collarbone!) and positively
dangerous!

I've said this before (and I will probably say it again) - we are involved
in a hobby/profession which the general public tends to ridicule anyway -
it is my opinion that we have a responsibility to each other not to
encourage that ridicule!  The general public doesn't know the difference
between RenFaire, SCA or Living History (or any of the other definitions),
so we all get tarred with the same brush when people do stupid things.

If they did want to display their charms, they had two alternatives which
spring to mind from the 16th century.  Firstly, there are several wood cuts
of women in taverns, generally believed to be prostitutes ('The Elizabethan
Underworld' by Salgado includes them).  These show necklines below the
breasts, showing the nipples, with ruffs running under the breasts, as if
on a platter.  The rest of the bodice looks normal.  This is what I would
call 'tits on a platter'.  The breasts are in a normal position - armpit
level or below.

I've seen this role played in living history, and played a retired pro'
myself (I'm 38) (not in this kind of outfit).  It is not a role I would
advise anyone to play in contact with the general public, certainly not a
young girl - it is very difficult and you are liable to find yourself in a
very awkward situation unless you are very good at handling men!  I have
met girls who thought it would be fun, but it doesn't last long, the great
British male public soon disabused them of that idea!

The second alternative is very high gentry from the late 16th and early
17th century.  Anne of Denmark (James I's  wife) shows this fashion in her
pictures.  The neckline is low, almost mid-torso and so are the breasts,
but it appears to be a 'monobosom' effect - no cleavage!  The ruff is worn
above the bosom, or framing it, around the back of the neck and down the to
edges of the square neckline.  I have worn this, and you certainly get a
reaction, but the rest of the clothes are very high (I wore it with an
embroidered jacket with gold spangles) and it is easy to control the
reaction!  In either case I would expect a high-necked smock or a partlett
(either black and solid or white and transparent) to be commonly worn with
the bodice.  Sunburn there is not a pleasure, and white skin was prized!


BTW, can I be pedantic here.  The term 'peasant' for 16th century England
was not used in period, and is not an appropriate term for the condition of
working people.  It implies a legal relationship to the land which did not
exist then (a peasant is 'tied' to the land in some way).  The period term
is 'lower orders' ie it defines working people in relation to the 'higher'
or 'middle orders'.


To return to clothes ..

The 'Wedding at Bermondsey', painted in 1569, shows a wide range of social
classes, and is the best example of non-gentry clothing I can think of,
apart from Breugel's pictures - which are Flemish from the 1550s.  I don't
know the painter of the 'Wedding at Bermondsey' but the original is at
Hatfield House, if thats any help - it does turn up in a lot of costume
books.  Breugel is wonderful - he shows all the seams!

Talking about leather jerkins - I'm happy in principle, but saddle leather
sounds a bit heavy (except for blacksmiths?!) and 'Celtic' knotwork is
right out - BTW I'm told that what is thought of as Celtic knotwork isn't,
its properly named Hiberno-Saxon, being a fusion of British/Irish motifs
with Germanic ones.  The Germanic contribution is the interlace/knotwork
pattern, the British/Irish being the spiral work, the fusion occurring
around 650 CE onwards.

Caroline
Whose motif in the kitchen is 'getting it right is easier'!

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 09:35:23 -0500
From: Joe Marfice <af289@dayton.wright.edu>
Subject: Re: Knights Templar or.../ Armor

On Wed, 06 Mar 1996, db-cos@westmore.demon.co.uk (David Brewer) wrote:
[....]
>I know nothing about modern "Knights Templar", but AFAIK the
>"Maltese Cross" (in white on black) is symbolic (still, after
>eight centuries) of the Knight of the Hospital of St. John in
>Jerusalem (Knights Hospitalar or -of St. John), [....]

Ah, ma fou!  Thank you, David; of course you're right.  It is the curse of my
mind to retain every detail I hear...except the ones that tie the bits
together.


On Wed, 6 Mar 1996  Charlie (DRGNFTR@aol.com) wrote:
>[....] and that the armor of common soldiers was simple and
>usually painted black to prevent rust. Existing example of these peices
>are currently at the Tower of London. [....]

In all the examples I am familiar with, the "black paint" was actually
blackening--either by imbedding carbon in the metal surface, as when one
"seasons" a cast iron skillet, or by heat treating in an oxygen-poor
environment to "blue" or "brown" steel (a kind of highly-stable rust).  If you
have sources which describe true painting, please let me know.

The only examples of painted armor of which I am aware are the
heraldically-decorated heaumes of XIVth & XVth-C Germany, to which Jaelle/Judy
Gerjuoy  referred earlier.  I do not even know of a quick-drying paint which
was waterproof, in this age.

>[....] However I think
>you will find as I said earlier that if you check the background of the
>armor it usually belonged to someone of High means.
[....]

So, Gael, is your husband attempting something highbrow?  Emulating a knigget,
perhaps?  Or just another plebe squire, eaking out his existence and dodging
the arwes as best he can?  Since he sounds as if he is emulating the
well-to-do, does he have servants, squires, and power tools enough to keep it
spiffed?

  |   Broom,                           at The Lady Perrine
  |   aka Joe Marfice
  |   Ministerium honor est.
 \|/  which means "I tot I taw a tilk moire' tabby weave!"
 /|\   513-222-2330                    233 Perrine Street
//|\\   af289@dayton.wright.edu        Dayton (my fayre citee), OH 45410

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 08:43:13 -0600
From: Jan Rosenthal <jan.rosenthal@METC.STATE.MN.US>
Subject: gloves and gaiters

Does anyone know what kind of gloves ladies would have worn at the
turn of the century for informal activities, e.g. walking, boating,
picnicking, etc.?  What would they have been made of?  Would knitted
ones have been acceptable, perhaps of fine cotton?

Also, what kind of fabric would gaiters have been made of?  I assume
something fairly stiff?

Thanks for any and all help!  :-)  JR

jan.rosenthal@metc.state.mn.us
"Whatever diminishes the sense of superiority in men makes them more
manly, brotherly, and pleasant to have about."  Frances Willard, 1895

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 9:37:32 -0600 (CST)
From: Deb <BADDORF@daffy.fnal.gov>
Subject: RE: bosom fashions (was RenFaires)

Regarding fashions in bosoms:
I can't exactly recall the book's title, and can't find any 
references to it here at work,  but it goes something like:
  Engravings of French Fashion 
   From Le Gallery de Mode           (?)

Anyway, it covers the time period from 1777 or so, till 1795 or so.
There is at least one plate in which the normal "deep scoop"  or
"deep square" neckline gets a little deeper yet, and the nipples
are clearly shown.

HOWEVER:  this is meant to be fashion advertising.  How many
people have you ever seen who actually WEAR the stuff from
the high fashion coutoure shows in Paris???
   I do not know if real live people actually wore this fashion!

<============================================================>   <IX0YE><
Deb Baddorf        baddorf@fnal.gov       Costumer, RevWar re-enactor

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 07 Mar 96 10:42:19 -0500
From: "Augusta, Karen" <oldlace@sover.net>
Subject: Empress Elisabeth

- -- [ From: Augusta, Karen * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --


I am doing some research on Elisabeth of Bavaria, Empress of Austria, Queen
of Hungary (1837-1898).  I am interested to know of the whereabouts of any
of her personal clothing or of any  lace owned by the Empress or Emperor
Franz Joseph (which museums in Vienna or Hungary?etc.).  In a Fortune
magazine printed in the 1930's I read that FJ had quite a lace collection -
but I have found no corroboration of this in any of the biographies I have
read on either monarch, and it does seem to contradict the historical
portrait of FJ as a frugal, austere man.  I'm hoping someone on this list
might have visited a museum in Austria or Hungary and seen some of her/their
personal effects (and can furnish me with addresses, etc.).  One last
question,  anyone out there know of any good historical biographies on
either monarch? Their lives were full of tragedy and scandal and I bet
there's some great reading out there (other than the dry stuff I've been
reading!).....Thanks for any help that comes my way.  Please email me
privately.
Karen
oldlace@sover.net

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 08:03:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Margaret Griffith <peggieg@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Ren fair costumes

>   
> I've done fairs for years yet realize I don't know much about what 
> authentic peasant dress would be like.  Partly it's because there aren't 
> many paintings of the peasantry, as there are of the nobles.
> 
> Anyway, I'm curious if you or anyone could describe a prototypical 
> peasant costume that might be more accurate than the ones that have 
> become the standards.
> 
One pretty good source for at least Northern European, late renaissance 
peasant costuming is the paintings of Peter Breugal Senior, available in 
the art section of most libraries.  He did a lot of paintings of peasant 
weddings, peasant festivals (such as Lenten festivals), etc.

The women in his paintings tend to wear white shirts, ankle length 
colored skirts (reds and blues seemed popular), and waist length jackets 
with close but not tightly fitted sleeves.  Most of the women are shown 
with aprons and coifs.

The men and boys are shown wearing white shirts, waist length jackets, 
and what look like close fitting pants (footless hose? it's hard to tell) 
with thick boots or shoes.  There are various hats on the men which I 
can't begin to describe.

Hope this helps,

Meg Penrose

------------------------------

Date: Thu,  7 Mar 96 08:30:23 MST
From: mgriggs@shepards.com
Subject: re: Washing Linen

Chelsea Hoffmann <choffmann%earthlink.net@internet.shepards.com Wrote:
| AHH, LINEN
| I just attended a workshop for making Irish L=E9ine (pronounced LIN-YA or =
| LIN -- it looks like a nightgown with really long, hanging sleeves) which  =
| should be made of linen. I was told that it was best to prewash/dry the =
| material for major shrinkage, and leave from six to twelve inches in the =
| hem for future shrinkage. Expect it to shrink more warp-wise (with the =
| grain) over time: we were warned that if we cut the length of the gown =
| against the grain it would be too tight to wear in a year or so, but if =
| cut with the grain and hemmed at the ankle it would shrink to mid-calf.  =
<clip>

This sounds soooo comfortable!  Where can I find info for making one?

Lyssa


- -----------------------------------------
Lady Leofsige O Caoimh
mgriggs@shepards.com
Lyssa@kktv.com
http://www.usa.net/~norseman/dragon.html
- -----------------------------------------

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:18:26 -0700 (MST)
From: cwood@primenet.com
Subject: Wallets and Pocketbooks?

Does anyone know what men in the late 19th century would have carried their
money in, both coin and paper? Wallets like we do? Bigger or smaller? And
any ideas as to where they would have carried these wallets, particularly if
they were Army officers whose uniform blouse did not include an inside pocket? 

Thanks.

Ysabeau 

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 02:59:26 EST
From: CSRT29A@prodigy.com (MR A R CRAIG)
Subject: Where did the man's tie come from?

Hello folks:

I've trying to locate information on where tie's come from.  Can anyone
tell me?  I'd be especially interested in knowing where in current
literature I might find some information on this.  Any help would be
appreciated.

Because I am not part of this news-group, please E-Mail me in private
at:  csrt29a@prodigy.com

Thanks, A. Craig.
Upper Marlboro, Maryland.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 13:18:04 -0500
From: Saralyon@aol.com
Subject: Re: Egyption clothing ideas

wn a computer so I must drive over to my mother's to use hers
[pitiful I know] & I'm just now reading a weeks worth of dijests. I might
have some insights on creating Egyptian garments.
Remember, we really don't know exactly what they wore in ancient Egypt as no
specimens survive & the stylization of Egyptian art makes it difficult to
interpret just what's going on. I think the cloths were softer and more flowy
than tomb paintings depict. As w/ Greek clothing, most pattern pieces were
probably square, rectangular, or circular. The thrust was not on cut but
fabric and its decoration. This can be seen in African clothing today. I
would try draping the shapes you want in a light cotton/linen. If you must
pleat something, use a primative pleating method. Here's one:

Take a length of linen [make sure it's real] larger than your pattern piece &
fold it into accordian-like pleats the size you want.
With twine, tie around the now bulky mass of pleated up stuff to hold the
pleats in place. Be sure to tie the top & bottom & at about 1" intervals down
the length of the bundle.
Now emerse the whole thing in boiling water. Be sure it's wet all the way
though.
Hang it up.....still tied......to dry w/ a weight tied to the bottom. Be sure
it's enough weight to keep the bundle taught
When it's completely dry, [probably the next day] undo it & see what you get.
You should get soft, not too even but accurate to the period pleats.

Also, as w/ all clothing before the sewing machine, there are as few seams as
possible. Remenber this as you drape.
If you would like to see some costumes I think really capture the flavor of
what these anchient people wore, check out some of the  TNT "Old Testament"
miniseries. The dramas are awful but the clothes are wonderful. I remember in
the one on Joseph, Potiphar's wife weres a open weave knitted shift that
clings to the figure like in tomb paintings.

Bona Fortuna! 
Gray Hunter

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 01:51:04 -0500
From: annmarie carrier <carrier@cybernex.net>
Subject: Costume Web Page At Last

Hi everyone.  Wanted to let you know I've gotten my page up at last.  The
address is:  http://

www2.cybernex.net/~carrier/costumes.html - please check back often though,
as I will be adding many resources and information regarding costuming.

BTW, if anyone needs any info on the Costume Show in Chicago later this
month, let me know.

Also, you might be interested in checking out our consignment page too:
http://www2.cybernex.net/~carrier/ht.html.  Hope you can visit!

Annmarie

------------------------------

Date: 07 Mar 96 13:37:44 EST
From: "1Lt Derrick Stamos" <DERRICK.STAMOS@BCMOOD.AF.MIL>
Subject: Where ties come from....

Thailand of course!


Sorry, couldn't resist this one....    ;)


- -Derrick

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 13:49:05 -0500
From: Kevin Richard-Morrow <krmorrow@ajb.dni.us>
Subject: Re: Wallets and Pocketbooks?

At 09:18 AM 3/7/96 -0700, you wrote:
>Does anyone know what men in the late 19th century would have carried their
>money in, both coin and paper? Wallets like we do? Bigger or smaller? And
>any ideas as to where they would have carried these wallets, particularly if
>they were Army officers whose uniform blouse did not include an inside pocket? 
>
>Thanks.
>
>Ysabeau 
>
>
>

       I am afraid my reply will out of period, but only by a century(!). 
       I know that men and women of the late 18th century, and  through the
Civil War, carried money and important papers in wallets. You can see photos
of 18th century examples in Neumann and Kravic, COLLECTORS ILLUSTRATED
ENCYLOPEDIA OF THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR and 18TH CENTURY CLOTHING AT
WILLIAMSBURG and I recall at least one original at Fort Ticonderoga. 
       The examples and illustrations of wallets from the War of 1812 and
Civil War I have seen look very much the same. The size had changed slightly
possibly due to a change in the size of paper money.
       About the mid 19th century the hinged snap top purse developed for
coins. Tandy Leather used to sell, and  may still, the hardware for these.   
     One of the BOOK OF BUCKSKINING series (vol. 2, I think) had patterns
for  18th and  early 19th century wallets and purses. 
     I have handled two early 20th century cadet jackets from West Point.
They both had inside breast pockets that seemed suited to the task of
carrying wallets or papers. 
     I am sorry I don't have primary sources on the 19th century (the 18th
is my "gig") but try contacting; 

                  The Company of Military Historians
                  North Main Street 
                  Westbrook, CT
                  06498  
        
      These folks are THE source for info on military minutia from all
periods.    

                   Kevin Richard-Morrow 

------------------------------

End of H-Costume Digest V4 #55
******************************

A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, send the command lines:

    unsubscribe h-costume-digest
    subscribe h-costume
    end

in the body of a message to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com.

Thanks and enjoy the list!
