From: owner-h-costume-digest (H-Costume Digest)
To: h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: H-Costume Digest V4 #112
Reply-To: h-costume
Sender: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Errors-To: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


H-Costume Digest           Thursday, May 9 1996           Volume 4, Number 112

  Compilation copyright (C) 1996  Diane Barlow Close and Gretchen Miller
  Use in whole prohibited.  Individual articles are the property of
  the author.  Seek permission from that author before reprinting or
  quoting elsewhere.

Important Addresses:

  Send submissions to:   h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com (or reply to
			  this message).
  Adds/drops/archives:   majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com
  Real, live person:     h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Topics:
    Thanks Re:Bodices
    Re: Thanks Re: 1840s Bodices
    Re: H-Costume Digest V4 #110
    Cap Sleeves
    Re: H-Costume Digest V4 #110
    Re: San Francisco Trip
    Re: foolish garments/Hercules
    goofy garb
    Trapped Drawers
    Re: San Francisco Trip
    Re: Drawers
    Drawers
    rashes, and other attrocities.
    help dying silk
    Drawers
    Corded cloth and milled caps
    Re: goofy garb 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 07 May 1996 22:19:36 -0400
From: Dale Loberger <dloberger@esri.com>
Subject: Thanks Re:Bodices

Thanks to the chorus of voices and info on front closing bodices in the 
1840’s.  My husband’s machine was down the better part of last week and 
I just got most of your messages today.  I should have called my good 
friend Saundra myself and asked her but I bug her so much about so many 
things and she is just about the busiest person I know!  Anyway, it was 
gratifying to see my original thoughts shared and documented by so many. 
 This is a support group, too, isn’t it?  (To confide of our experiences 
with the Costume Nazis for comfort and reassurance and all that?!)  
Believe it or not, I had already shown the woman in question the 
pictures of front closing ‘40’s gowns in Calico Chronicle and others in 
books by Estelle A. Worrell, Millia Davenport, and Vanda Foster., and 
she frowned and just shook her head, stating that these must really be 
earlier or later gowns than they were claimed to be, or else the front 
closing was not functional, and the gown actually closed in the back.  I 
felt like an idiot.  I don’t know her background or her reasoning, and 
it seems even more odd when you know that her site depicts rural middle 
to lower class, to boot.  All of your help with this gives me the guts 
to go back and speak with her again.  I do want to re-enact at this site 
but it is imperative with a four-month old (who also re-enacts!) that I 
am able to nurse conveniently.  And I just hate hitting brick walls that 
are unnecessary to begin with.

Have left message with Saundra to please send pics & info she has to 
show this lady but due to professional courtesy I cannot reveal the 
site.  This is my job, after all! ;-)

Thanks again.  You guys are great.

Susannah Eanes, Mantua Maker and Fine Tailoring
(Susan B. Loberger , Susannah’s Heirloom, Ltd.)

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 21:31:15 -0700
From: savaskan@electriciti.com (Julie Adams)
Subject: Re: Thanks Re: 1840s Bodices

Susannah Eanes wrote:
> I do want to re-enact at this site
>but it is imperative with a four-month old (who also re-enacts!) that I
>am able to nurse conveniently.

I can't imagine this woman has ever breastfed or she would know that it is
imperative that a front opening be a part of the gown. In "The Workwoman's
Guide", written in 1838, Plate 14 shows vertical pleats or pleats on a "V"
on page 105.

Petticoats are described on page 104 as what we would normally think of as
a gown:
              Petticoats

"Petticoats are made of calico, twill, dimity, cambric, and jaconet muslin,
sometimes for mourning, or for wearing under thin dresses of silk and
satin: for the middling and lower classes, they are of calico, strong
dimity, calimanco, stuff, and bombazine: the are made in various ways,
which will be described in the following pages, and the patterns given: the
figures and the sizes of persons differ so essentially that scales will not
be attempted.
Petticoats are in three distinct parts--the skirt, the body, and the
sleeves, the varieties of each will be treated in their turn."

On page 106:
                  Nursing Petticoats

"For the convenience of those mothers who nurse their infancts, the
petticoat body in front may be opened in various ways."

On page 113:

                  Nursing Gowns

"These must vary according to the pattern of the gown. In a body with folds
laid on, the openings must be made in the bosom-gore on each side, which
button up, having a fold or flap of silk behind, to prevent any danger of
taking cold."

IMHO, a book published in 1838 for lower and middle class women would be
used well into the 1840s.  Sorry it took me awhile to respond, I have been
busy with a 2 1/2 yr old...:-)

The information on the book:

The Workwoman's Guide
by A Lady
A facsimile reproduction of the original book by
Opus Publications Inc.
Post Road Box 269,
Guilford, Connecticut 06437
ISBN 0-940983-00-1

It is supposedly used by Sturbridge Village, Sturbridge MA (617) 347-3362

Good Luck!

Julie Adams

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 7 May 1996 21:33:07 -0700
From: thomas gladysz <thomasg@slip.net>
Subject: Re: H-Costume Digest V4 #110

At 08:24 PM 5/6/96 -0700, you wrote:
>
>I am traveling to San Francisco this Thursday and I am wondering if anyone of
>you would be kind enough to tell me where I can find bookstores that carry
>books on fashion, historical or current.  Also, I would like to know if there
>is any place that has displays or anything of historical costume related 
>interests.  I am doing a project on a particular fashion item that is 25 to 30
>years old.  I haven't had any particular item in mind, and I am wondering if 
>anyone of you have any suggestion as where to go about finding them in SF.
>Thanks for helping me out!


Please come to my store!  I've been the costume/fashion book buyer for A
Clean Well-Lighted Place for Books for years  and I try to stock bunches of
costume books.  We have the various dover books of course, we stock corsets
& crinolines, the Patterns of Fashion series by Arnold, and just about
everything else I can dredge up.  We only carry new books, but we do try to
have a wide selection.  We also have some really stunning hardcover
pictorials.  Right now we have _Fashion in Art : the Second Empire and
Impressionism_ by Marie Simon.  It's a pretty interesting book about what
the clothes worn in the works of the impressionists ( was Sargent considered
an impressionist?) reveal about fashion.  Not just boring Freudian stuff,
but interesting things like the craze for "historical clothing" during this
period.  It is also copiously illustrated with good quality colour
photographs of garments and reproductions of paintings.  It's $50.00 and
well worth it.  Sorry I got crried away.

Anyhow, we are A Clean Well-Lighted Place for Books, we're at 601 Van Ness,
San Francisco, 94102.  We're open from 10am till 11pm.  Our phone number is
441-6670.  I'll be working on Thursday and I'm always glad to chat costuming
and vintage fashions.  The only other store I'd consider going to is Green
Apple on Clement St. near 5th Ave.  They get used costume books in
occasionally.  Big really expensice old stuff that I wish I could afford.

Have a good trip

Christy.

------------------------------

Date: 08 May 96 09:21:00 GMT
From: Mrs C S Yeldham <csy20688@ggr.co.uk>
Subject: Cap Sleeves

The reason I said ASCII couldn't represent what I meant, is because


|\
| \
|  |
|  |
| /
|/

Is precisely *not* what I meant!  I meant that in order to get the sleeve
to sit neatly (unless you *want* a la Klingon) *both* edges have to be
curved

|\
\ \
 \ \
  | |
 / /
|/

Nope, doesn't work!  The outer curve is usually gentler than the inner.  I
haven't tried a curved inner edge and a straight outer, but I would have
thought a curved outer would sit better.

Thanks for the info about the shoe stuff of Rialto.  I would be grateful
for any 16th or 15th century English info (food as well?) on there as I
don't have access (my account is at work, and there are limits on access to
bulletin boards etc - anything except Web pages and mailing lists is very
limited.)

Caroline

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 12:55:35 -0400
From: Morigianna@aol.com
Subject: Re: H-Costume Digest V4 #110

In a message dated 96-05-06 23:31:32 EDT, you write:

>Crotchless drawers are not "silliness."  They are necessary to go the
>bathroom while wearing a corset. The drawers waistband is pinned under the
>corset, so you can't take them down.  

Thanks for the info- Whenever I wear my corset(admittedly it's new) I wear
knee length bloomers so my legs don't rub together and I get heat rash. I
didn't know about pinning them so I haven't had a problem in the bathroom. I
guess if you have a 14" waist your thighs wouldn't rub! :-)      Misty

------------------------------

Date: 8 May 1996 12:06:56 -0700
From: "Agnes Gawne" <agnes_gawne@urology.urol.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: San Francisco Trip

REPLY:                RE>San Francisco Trip                        5/7/96

I replied off the list yesterday but since the Clean Well Lighted Place for
Books posted to the list I will add this info to the pool of knowledge

Try Drama Books in San Francisco for some costume books, they are a theater
book store but I have had good luck there.   Black Oak Books in Berkeley is a
used book store that often has good costume books, I have gotten some real
treasures there in the past.

The De Young Museum at Golden Gate Park often has some costumes on display. 
Contact Melissa Levinson, the costume curator, if you need to know ahead of
time what is on display.

Good luck and enjoy San Francisco.
Agnes

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 12:26:25 -0700
From: Susan Fatemi <susanf@eerc.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: foolish garments/Hercules

For stupid garments for women: jumpsuits, catsuits, "playsuits", Donna Karen
bodysuits, and more recently seen in dept. stores, a one-pc. "dress" with a
split skirt (i.e. culottes)  Possibly I missed some vital instruction in my
life, but I cannot figure out how one attends to nature's call without
getting completely undressed!  No wonder there are long lines at the restroom! 

Re: Hercules costume.  If you want to make him *really* authentic, he would
be naked, with perhaps a lion skin (panther skin?) draped tastefully over
one shoulder.  Otherwise, any book on Greek art or mythology should give you
some clues. (Hercules is of course, the Roman spelling, Herakles is the
Greek. Maybe you could put him in a Roman tunic for modesty, but it wouldn't
be authentic)

>>I need to present clothing ideas for a movie about  Hercules.


Susan Fatemi

susanf@eerc.berkeley.edu

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 16:22:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: aleed <aleed@dnaco.net>
Subject: goofy garb

I have to say that late Elizabethan takes the cake for Most Absurd Fashion
Statement of the Millenium.  Those vast and all-encompassing ruffs, wheel
farthingales and inhumanly long torsos were weird.  No other way to put
it.

And how about pluderhosen?  The first time I saw a pair, complete with
beribboned and bepuffed codpiece, they looked like a combo between a
deflated innertube and a drapery display at JCPenneys.

Someone once told me--I believe it was on this list--about the short
period in time during the turn of the 19th century  when waistlines
ascended to right below the bust but court fashion still dictated that
panniers had to be worn.  Women looked like walking tents.  I'd love to
find an original picture of this somewhere.

Platform shoes, however, still top my personal list of sillinesses.
Especially the ones with goldfish in the heels.

Drea
- -------------------------------
We've secretly replaced
their dilithium crystals
with new folgers crystals.
Now let's watch them go to warp.
- -------------------------------

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 16:03:21 -0700
From: gwjchris@ix.netcom.com (Bill and Glenna Christen)
Subject: Trapped Drawers

You wrote: 

>>Crotchless drawers 

>I didn't know about pinning them so I haven't had a problem in the 
>bathroom.

The drawers aren't pinned with a pin, but pinned as in "trapped" or 
firmly held in place under the corset.  
Words are slippery things aren't they? :-)

Glenna Jo Christen
gwjchris@ix.netcom.com

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 19:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Catnip <catnip@crl.com>
Subject: Re: San Francisco Trip

If you have time during your visit to SF, try to get over to Laci's in 
Berkeley.  They're just across the street from the Ashby Ave. BART 
station.  Nice selection of books and lots of wonderful stuff to ogle and 
purchase!

- - Cat

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 03:26:32 -0400
From: DiderotDC@aol.com
Subject: Re: Drawers

One hates to belabor the point but, I think calling the garment in question
"crotchless" is a bit misleading. "Crotch-opening" might be a better
discription, as all the examples of drawers that I've ever seen, closed with
2 or 3 buttons much like many contemporary "body-suits." As has been
previously suggested this is for reasons of perfectly practical bathroom
convinence.

If anyone knows of truely crotchless [open & unfastened] bloomers I'd like to
know what function [other than purely salacious] this feature might have
preformed.

Thanks

------------------------------

Date: 09 May 96 14:38:00 GMT
From: Mrs C S Yeldham <csy20688@ggr.co.uk>
Subject: Drawers

At Eastercon Frances (sorry, rest of name's gone - Guilia, do you
remember?) gave a presentation on underwear, and showed original garments,
some of the 18th century drawers were definitely two legs attached to a
waistband, then she showed an example where the back was sewn together for
about 6 inches - probably for ease of management.

On thigh rubbing and heat rash, the best tip I have ever been given is to
use dry stick deordorant on your thighs (I use it every day, in or out of
tights).  I don't know what it is called in the States but it looks like a
firm stick of creamy/greasy baby powder, and really stops rubbing.  Unlike
creams/greases, it is not absorbed, so lasts all day.  Natrel is one
marketing name

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 10:40:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: The Espresso Pegasus! <sdavitt@d.umn.edu>
Subject: rashes, and other attrocities.

When faced with rubbing legs, I tend to wear lycra capri tights, or 
longer biker shorts (so they don't ride-up)  And if none are available.. 
Baby Powder is your best friend.  Lotion and Talc... 

Take Care!
Sarahj

PS, still looking for wonderful medivael and costuming sites in southern 
France!... I will come back fully prepared to give dicertations.


______________________.oO*Oo._______________________
You Can Fret Me, But You Cannot Play Upon Me--Hamlet

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 10:54:58 -0700
From: Heather Meadows <godiva@bing.apple.com>
Subject: help dying silk

I just got the best deal and bought 20 yards of raw green silk
for $100... the only problem is it is a little too bright for what
I intend to use it for.  

I'm very used to dying cottons using Procion MX and Rit and Dylon etc.
But I've never dyed silk or this large of a quantity of fabric at once
and I'm looking for tips - I don't have a washer big enough to handle 
20 yards of silk and I'm wondering what dyes will work best -
I want to turn it from emerald to forest or hunter green.


thanks!

- -heather meadows
godiva@bing.apple.com

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 19:10:36 -0400
From: BarbMVD@aol.com
Subject: Drawers

This has been labored over enough to be ridiculous. 

 In reply to CSY, please, Englishwomen and those in the colonies did not wear
underdrawers in the 18th century,and it was well into the 19th before the
practice was adopted. If you have a problem try the practical method of
taking the back hem of your shift, draw it between your legs, bring it up and
tuck it under your petticoat waistband, cord or whatever. This also keeps the
drafts away in chilly weather. On many occasions groups of female reenactors
(Rev War, etc.) have "gone regulation" in the field and worked the problems
out (18th century mind-set).

And to DiderotDC, there were no buttons or closing cords other than at the
waist in the 19th century and the reasons have been most capably and
thoroughly discussed and explained in the past week. Not salacious at all,
but PRACTICAL- PRACTICAL!

Barbara M. Delorey
Circle of the Rose

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 20:55:35 -0500 (EST)
From: LACONSTANCE@delphi.com
Subject: Corded cloth and milled caps

Dear Angela,

I, too, am interested in trade cloths of this era:

> 1. "corded cloth"--some editors of published versions of fur trade journals 
> say "corded cloth" is corduroy. 

There are many types of corded cloth, besides corduroy.  Bedford cord is one.  
 

> 2. "milled caps"--everyone agrees that these are some kind of hats. One 
> editor claims they could be made ("milled") from calico. 

I believe the reference to "milled" caps means felted.  "Milled" is a specific 
textile term which means "fulled" (or subjected to controlled shrinkage) or
"felted".  I suppose they could have been the knitted tocques, but I don't
know that these ever were actually milled after knitting. 

Constance La Lena
laconstance@delphi.com

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 09 May 96 20:59:25 -0500
From: ejp@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: goofy garb 

aleed <aleed@dnaco.net>  writes:
> Someone once told me--I believe it was on this list--about the short
> period in time during the turn of the 19th century  when waistlines
> ascended to right below the bust but court fashion still dictated that
> panniers had to be worn.  Women looked like walking tents.  I'd love to
> find an original picture of this somewhere.

There IS an original picture, to which I can give you only a lousy
reference.  :)  Sorry.

You need to find a reprint of "Galerie de Modes", and I do NOT mean
the Dover book by that name.  The Dover book is the right magazine,
all right, but it doesn't reprint enough years.  It only goes up
to 1787, which isn't late enough.

I believe the Galerie in the University of Arizona library, in the
GT section or thereabouts, will have the picture you want.  It's
worth chasing down; it's a hoot and a half.  :)

cheers, ejp
- --------
Elizabeth Poole         Yorktown Heights, NY         ejp@watson.ibm.com

------------------------------

End of H-Costume Digest V4 #112
*******************************

A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, send the command lines:

    unsubscribe h-costume-digest
    subscribe h-costume
    end

in the body of a message to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com.

Thanks and enjoy the list!
