From: owner-h-costume-digest (H-Costume Digest)
To: h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: H-Costume Digest V4 #134
Reply-To: h-costume
Sender: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Errors-To: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


H-Costume Digest           Monday, June 10 1996           Volume 4, Number 134

  Compilation copyright (C) 1996  Diane Barlow Close and Gretchen M Beck
  Use in whole prohibited.  Individual articles are the property of
  the author.  Seek permission from that author before reprinting or
  quoting elsewhere.

Important Addresses:

  Send submissions to:   h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com (or reply to
			  this message).
  Adds/drops/archives:   majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com
  Real, live person:     h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Topics:
    Medieval Hats (c1300)
    Re: Medieval Hats (c1300)
    re: Help with double running stitch...
    re: cross dressing
    delurk alert
    New Corset Web Page
    Re: Blackwork
    Boston
    New Corset Web Page
    Re: Drawers
    Unsubscribe reminder...
    tawdry lace
    Re: Boston
    Re: tawdry lace
    Re: Early corsets
    1870's gown
    Jackson,Mississippi
    tawdry lace
    Costume Museums in Paris, Prague, and Vienna

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 9:29:27 -0500 (CDT)
From: Marc Carlson <IMC@vax2.utulsa.edu>
Subject: Medieval Hats (c1300)

I am looking for information on medieval hats, specifically men's hats,
1300, England or France.  The sources I have at hand are pretty thin
regarding information on that topic.  Norris has a few pictures, but
since I can't trace his backtrail in this case, I'm a little leary.
The basic choices seem to be the Hood, the Coif, and some sort of
little sailor-cap looking affair.  It's really the third choice I'm
wanting to research, but at this point leads are a bit shy.

I would be willing to hit the archives here, but my instructions on
how to go about it appear to have fallen into some void.

Any hints or clues would be appreciated at this point.

Marc Carlson
IMC@VAX2.UTULSA.EDU

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:07:04 -0400
From: MDSDMB@aol.com
Subject: Re: Medieval Hats (c1300)

Try Boucher, 20,000 Years of Fashion. Look closely at the bibliographical
stuff noted with the pictures and go from there.
Also try Mary K Houston, Medieval Costume in England & France, 1979 (reprint)
Adams & Charles Black Pub.
A little late, but possibly of some use is Stella Mary Newton, Fashion In The
Age Of The Black Prince, 1980, Boydell Press.
Most of these will probably be Interlibrary Loan (that miracle of miracles).
Good Luck

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 9:20:36 -0500 (CDT)
From: Marc Carlson <IMC@vax2.utulsa.edu>
Subject: re: Help with double running stitch...

I'm sorry if this duplicates any of the other responses in this thread.
In leatherwork, the double running stitch is made by running a piece
of thread with a needle at both ends through the leather at the same
time (more or less), through the same hole.  This allows for a greater 
control of the tension of each stitch, and, if you use the same pattern 
for which needle actually goes through the hole first, you can get a more
consistant pattern of stitch shape.

This is also known as a "saddle stitch".

Another benefit to this particular type of stitching is that you can
(either at every stich, or every so often) lock the stitches into place,
by slipping the needles through the loops that are created as you pull the
thread "tight", creating a half hitch knot *inside* the holes.

When you finish a bit of thread, start the next piece a few holes back so
that there is the same effect of "backstitching" through the same holes to
hold the thread in place, and then "backstitch" at the very end of the piece.

I'm told by people who work with fabric that there's some arcane reason
that I'm just not meant to understand ( :) ) for why this can't be done 
this way using fabric and thread or floss, therefore can't be used to
make Holbein stitches.

If this is not particularly useful, again, My apologies.

Marc Carlson
IMC@VAX2.UTULSA.EDU

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 6 Jun 96 15:49:49 CDT
From: bednarek@tidalwave.med.ge.com (Dennis Bednarek Mfg 4-6971 ~BHOSVWZ#097)
Subject: re: cross dressing

 
 	Doesn't cross dressing go both ways?  I seem to recall
 a case where some historical US figuer dressed as a woman to  alow him to move  about freely when the British had a bounty
 on his head.  Story is vague but I'm sure some history buffs
 here can shead more light on this story.
 
 Dennis
 

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 23:47:01 -0400
From: Jafath@aol.com
Subject: delurk alert

Hello!

It was a wonderful idea to put the archives for this list on a web
page. I've been beguiling my odd moments by reading them ALL.(Being a
compulsive reader means never having nothing to do ...) I've added to
my impressive collection of useless facts, and also to my "try to find
at the library" list. I'm enjoying it a lot, and not least because this
is such a literate group! I mean, gosh, here's people who even know the
difference between "discreet" and "discrete."  Of course, this list
also seems to have the highest ratio I've seen yet of librarians to
"other professions" and (speaking as someone who is one-third of one
myself) I suspect there's a direct correlation.

I have a query to post, but I'll do that separately. Delurking bio first.

Yes, I've been sewing, knitting, and embroidering most of my life (since
I was 8 or 9, anyway), and yes, I made clothes and hats for my dolls
rather than playing with them.  On the other hand, I learned to sew only
from financial necessity, and continued it after I learned to enjoy it
because (a) sewing machines improved; (b) styles improved (I shudder to
recall the underarm placket zipper in a dress I made when I was 13) and
(c) I found out it was the only way to get the styles I liked in a form
that FIT. As for dolls, my real love was paper dolls: my favorite had a
whole shoebox full of fantastic clothes designed by me. My best friend
and I each had a doll from a Katy Keene or Patsy Walker comic book,
carefully pasted on cardboard: then we used sheets and sheets of typing
paper drawing them clothes. Sometimes we even played with the dolls,
but mostly we dreamed up clothes.

Time has gone by while I've done other things, but recently I joined SCA
and, having made three or four vaguely medieval outfits (both to get
the feel of the thing and so I'll have something to wear at Pennsic)
and trying out a number of ideas on my daughters' long-abandoned
Crissy dolls (takes a lot less fabric to fit a sideless surcoat on
Crissy than it does on me!) I am ready to do some research and make a
seriously-1396 outfit. I'm trying to decide whether or not that means
a houppelande. Guess I'll have to make one for Crissy and see how we
like it.

I work for a magazine -- layout and proofreading and such -- when I'm
not reading, knitting, or looking at pictures in costume books. And
I'm one-third of a librarian because (unless university funding gets so
snarled up they discontinue the program) I have eight more courses to
take to my MLS. It takes some of us a while to get to where we started
out to go; in my case, about thirty years.

Pleased to meet you all.

Jo Anne

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 22:46:53 -0700
From: Joan Broneske <unicorn@calweb.com>
Subject: New Corset Web Page

Well Everybody, I've been secretly working on a Victorian Corset How-To =
page and it is finally up.  Please let me know what you all think.  It =
is at:

http://www.calweb.com/~unicorn/corset.htm

Joan Broneske

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 08:41:39 -0400
From: Ngelina@aol.com
Subject: Re: Blackwork

>If anyone could please describe to me any thing about backwork and how it is
done,  I would be grateful. 

Since no else appears to have answered this request, you can have my two
groats worth:

Modern blackwork is a counted-thread technique using geometic patterns
repeats to fill shapes of an embroidery design.  Sixteenth century blackwork,
(and its predecessor, Spanishwork, if you make the distinction) was executed
both in counted-thread and surface stitch forms.  The period version uses
many more vegetive shapes (lots of vines, flowers and leaves) and much
simpler filling stitches, although examples of purely geometric bands also
exist.

The stitches used varied, from a simple running stitch up to a really
complicated braid stitch I'd have to get Mistress Louise of Woodsholme to
explain to you (care to  put her in front of the computer, Giles?), but it
seems to me you could go a long ways just with backstitch or double-running
stitch, satin stitch and outline stitch.

A very good blackwork book with lots of reference to period style is
_Blackwork Embroidery_ by Elisabeth Geddes and Moyra McNeill.  My copy was
printed by Dover in '76--it may still be in print and it probably will be
reasonably priced.  Thomasina Beck's books (_The Embroiderer's Garden_, _The
Embroiderer's Flowers_ and _The Embroiderer's Story_) are also full of
beautiful reproductions of period stuff.

Please don't consider this discussion to be anything approaching
exhaustive...

Karen/Angelina

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 12:39:10 -0400
From: DELTAYLOR@aol.com
Subject: Boston

I would like to ask if there are any must see costume displays (or any at
all) in the Boston area in June.  Are there any good costume book sources I
should try to visit?
Thank you for any information.
Dianne in TN

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 10:06:55 -0700
From: Joan Broneske <unicorn@calweb.com>
Subject: New Corset Web Page

Thanks to everyone who told me about my screwed up Home links.  I have =
gone in and fixed them and tested them and everything is now working.

If anyone has a corset page, costume page, page with pictures of their =
costumes, etc. and would like a link on my page, just let me know and I =
will put you up.

Thanks again,

Joan Broneske

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 12:43:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: Ashley and Victoria Gilliam <gilliam@infinity.ccsi.com>
Subject: Re: Drawers

I know that this was a while ago (I'm really backed up on reading), but I 
wanted to suggest something I use for that 'thigh rubbing heat 
rash'...Balmex (which is supposed to be a diaper rash cream).  I apply in 
the morning & don't have to reapply during the day.

Yours, In Service to the Dream,
Ellsbeth Lachlanina MacLabhruinn
mka Vycke' (Victoria) Gilliam                          gilliam@ccsi.com
***********************************************************************
Future Knight & Laurel...Now I need armor, training, a topic....
Any errors in spelling, tact, or fact are transmission errors.
***********************************************************************

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 13:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: close (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: Unsubscribe reminder...

Phaedra M. Williams <pmwilli@comp.uark.edu> wrote:
> Sorry to take up the space, folks.  Stupid me, I was rearranging some of
> my files and lost the instructions on how to stop my mail for a while. 

Excellent time for me to post the semi-regular "how to unsubscribe"
reminder file!  (There's no vacation postpone function, unfortunately.)

To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:

   majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com

In that message, say one of the following as the body of the message:

   unsubscribe h-costume
   end

(if you are signed up to the direct mail version) or

   unsubscribe h-costume-digest
   end

(if you are signed up to the digest version.)
- -- 
Diane Close <close@lunch.engr.sgi.com> 
I'm at lunch all day. :-)
   If a Canadian Had Said It First (The Globe & Mail):
   "Cry havoc, and let loose the dogs of a peacekeeping mission!"  

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 23:55:31 -0400
From: Jafath@aol.com
Subject: tawdry lace

Here, as promised, is my question for the assembled multitude:

Saint Audrey/Etheldreda/Aethelthryth, born about 630, daughter of the king of
Mercia, married the king of Northumbria. She got tired of (a) being married
and (b) being a queen, so she instead became abbess of a convent in Ely,
about 673. (Her husband didn't like the idea, and she had to get the backing
of the local bishop, St. Wilfrid.) She died 679, of a tumor in her throat,
which she had disguised with "a silk necklace" (_torquem quendam_, for you
Latinists) and which she explained was her punishment for being fond of
jewelry in her youth. Ely promptly named their  trade fair in her honor, at
which the souvenir of choice was "Saint Audrey's Lace", described as "formed
of thin and fine silk, perchance in her memory." Tourism, craftsmanship, and
economics being much the same then as now, this popular item eventually gave
the language the word "tawdry." (If anyone knows more about her, or has
conflicting information, please e-mail!)

Question: would this really have been silk, either originally or by 1530,
which is when OED traces "tawdry" to? Would it really have been lace? If so,
what technique and shape do you suppose? (Possibly relevant, for fellow
Americans who, it is well known, are geographically deprived -- Ely is
northeast of London, near Cambridge.)

sources for the above include Aelfric's_ Lives of Saints_ and Harpsfield's
_Historia Anglicana Ecclesiastica_.(Harpsfield died in 1588, don't know about
Aelfric but I'm sure he was much earlier)

Any takers?

Jo Anne

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 10:43:59 -0400
From: MDSDMB@aol.com
Subject: Re: Boston

The Boston Museum of Fine Arts has a needlework show up that has several
costume pieces in it. Refer to the June issue of The Magazine Antiques for
particulars.
Enjoy,
MDSDMB

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 9 Jun 1996 08:18:22 -0700
From: Joan M Jurancich <joanj@mail2.quiknet.com>
Subject: Re: tawdry lace

At 11:55 PM 6/7/96 -0400, Jo Anne wrote:
Here, as promised, is my question for the assembled multitude:
>.... Ely promptly named their  trade fair in her honor, at
>which the souvenir of choice was "Saint Audrey's Lace", described as "formed
>of thin and fine silk, perchance in her memory." [snip]
>
>Question: would this really have been silk, either originally or by 1530,
>which is when OED traces "tawdry" to? Would it really have been lace? If so,
>what technique and shape do you suppose?

Yes, it could have been silk.  Silk was imported from China into the late
Roman Empire and its successors.  

But the word "lace" has two distinct meanings today, and in 1588.  One is
the 'fabric', as in 'bone lace' or 'reticella'; the other is (apparently)
the older one meaning some sort of cord, e.g., shoe lace or corset lace.  I
would think that the 'necklace' referred to in the earlier reference is
probably some sort of cord.  In fact, one of the problems faced in
'translating' 16th century descriptions of costume is figuring out which
meaning of 'lace' is meant; sometimes it is obvious from context, but not
always.

Hope this helps,

Joan Jurancich
joanj@quiknet.com

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 9 Jun 1996 08:30:04 -0700
From: Joan M Jurancich <joanj@mail2.quiknet.com>
Subject: Re: Early corsets

At 02:15 PM 6/5/96 -0400, Drea wrote:

>OK.  I have been searching high and low for the origin of the elizabethan
>corset, along with material evidence, and the pickings are slim.  All I've
>been able to find are the pair of bodies and the corset in Janet Arnold's
>book, the corset on the effigy of Queen Elizabeth, and very late 17th
>century corsets.  Does /anyone/ know of extant corsets from before 1550,
>excluding the ones I've mentioned?  Even small pieces of them?  I'd be
>very grateful for any scrap.
>
>Drea

I have not seen any references to actual surviving 'corsets', or to use the
16th century term, 'a pair of bodies'.  One problem is the language; 'a pair
of bodies' could be used to describe the 'bodies' of a gown or something
worn under a gown, either of which could be 'stiffened'.  Other than the
remains you list, as far as I know, our only references are pictures and
text descriptions. 

Wish it were otherwise.

Shalom, 

Joan Jurancich
joanj@quiknet.com

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 9 Jun 1996 15:28:42 -0500 (CDT)
From: The Espresso Pegasus! <sdavitt@d.umn.edu>
Subject: 1870's gown

Greetings!
I have returned from an absolutely fabulous trip to France and London 
(yay) and I saw many scraps of byzantine and Roman tunics.. And come 
Clerical garmants.. and I now have more books and I can possibly imagine 
(1/2 a suitcase worth) with many pictures...So if anyone is interested, 
please e-mail me privatly, and i will scan in, or fax some of my notes, 
and some of the pictures.

But wait, there's more!  ;)
While in London, I was visiting a relative, Sir Godfrey Style, and his 
wife Lady Valerie.  Upon metion that I made costumes, Valerie perked up 
and said I have a dress that one of Queen Vicoria's  Daughters wore.. And 
after recovering myself, She offered to show it to me... 

and it was absolutely gorgeous!... it was a Silk Satin with a lovely 
flower pattern stitched upon it, with Peplams (? 
little side bustle things) and front closure, boned, 21" waist, a inset 
of gathered chiffon to form a 'v' in the front, and I believe it had a 
round neckline, and it had meticulously pleated ruffle. and a train.

Lady Valerie had worn this dress for her wedding... and she had a ballet 
dancer model it for her a few years back, and she gave me a picture, which 
I will scan in and put up on the WEB, if anyone is interested.  She was 
also wishing to sell it because it saddened her that the dress was just 
sitting in her closet... so if you would be interested, of know anyone 
who may be, please contact me privatly, and i'll discuss it in more depth.

if anyone is interested, in the textile pictures, or the dress picture, 
please let me know.

Thanks!
Sarahj

______________________.oO*Oo._______________________
You Can Fret Me, But You Cannot Play Upon Me--Hamlet

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:48:26 -0600
From: reaves@tuvok.marian.edu (Anne Reaves)
Subject: Jackson,Mississippi

Monday July 2nd I'll be in Jackon to see that wonderful Russian exhibit.
Are there any good textile collections in Jackson open on Mondays?   Thanks
for the information.

Anne Reaves

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:58:21 -0600
From: reaves@tuvok.marian.edu (Anne Reaves)
Subject: tawdry lace

Yes, that St. Audrey story is an old one but survives in a much later form.
In the 16th c lace had three meanings: ties, bobbin lace, and needlelace.
(Recicella is only one type of needlelace.)

The ties could be twisted (often  used today for tassels and drawstrings),
or fingerwoven.   Queen Elizabeth's Wardrobe Unlocked has pictures of some
pages of a 16th c sample book of the fingerwoven, which the V & A staff are
hoping to publish someday.  Some of the designs closely resemble Japanese
Kumi Humi work, but the Elizabethans used  a designated number of people
for each design, rather than one person with a stand and bobbins like Kumi
Humi.  There's too little information about Anglo-Saxon textiles to know
which types of ties they might have made.   Even narrow woven tapes might
have been considered ties back then.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 10 Jun 96 15:58:43 PDT
From: DGC3%Rates%FAR@go50.comp.pge.com
Subject: Costume Museums in Paris, Prague, and Vienna

Several members on this list will be in Paris, Prague, and Vienna in July. Do 
readers of this list have any special recommendations for these cities? 

The two museums attached to the Louvre, the Musee des Arts Decoratif and the 
Musee de la Mode et du Costume, are closed for renovation through the end of 
1996, according to their web site (sigh).  From other postings, I have gleaned 
recommendations for the historic rooms in the Louvre, the Cluny Museum, and the 
Museum of Decorative Arts in Prague. 

I'd love to hear from others on the list about their favorite haunts in these 
three cities. Museums, bookstores, fabric stores, flea markets, lace museums, 
ribbons, jewelry, living history sites -- you kindred spirits understand! 

	----Danine
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danine Cozzens				Internet: dgc3@pge.com
Phone: 415/973-1388
Pacific Gas and Electric Company	San Francisco, CA
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

End of H-Costume Digest V4 #134
*******************************

A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, send the command lines:

    unsubscribe h-costume-digest
    subscribe h-costume
    end

in the body of a message to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com.

Thanks and enjoy the list!
