From: Gretchen Miller <grm+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 1994 18:07:29 -0500 (EST)
Subject: H-Costume Digest, Volume 75, 3/22/94

The Historic Costume List Digest, Volume 75, March 22, 1994

Send items for the list to h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu (or reply to this message).

Send subscription/deletion requests and inquiries to
h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

For archives of this digest, send mail to close@lunch.asd.sgi.com

Please note that some of this digest may have appeared in the last
digest; if so, I'm sorry...

Thanks and Enjoy!

---------------------------------------------------------------
Topics:
More bios
More on patterns
Historical Costume Conference musings
Buffyisms
More on toiles
Good periods for larger folks
Color of Mourning
Magazine article
Grommet setters
Berry stains
Civil War uniform video

------------------------------
From: "Weathersby, Guy" <guy@sannsm.sandiegoca.NCR.COM>
Subject: Beginner biography and mundane pattern review
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 16:16:00 PST

First, let me say that although I have subscribed to many newsgroups for
many years, this is the first time I have gotten on a mailing list so I
hope that I send this properly.  I get the impression that it is
regarded as tacky not to introduce yourself, so here goes.  As my
biography will indicate, I am unlikely to add much real data to this
group but perhaps I will be of some amusement, if nothing else.

Biography:

Generally the biographies in this group indicate that most of you have
been sewing since you were children and have been involved in historical
costuming for many years.  I believe one or two of you may have be
designing 19 century ball gowns while in the womb.  I, am a 42 year old
computer
programmer/analyst who, until a few weeks ago limited my sewing to
repairing pants hems with staples.  I have been to a few Renaissance
Fairs over the years, but have limited my costuming to wearing a cheap
Robin Hood hat.

About a month ago a group of us decided to go to Medieval Times, a sort
of Medieval dinner theater with knights jousting etc.  In a total
reversal of my usual personality, I decided to go in costume.  I also
decided that it was time to grow up and learn to sew.  So I had about
three weeks to
figure what I wanted to be, find a pattern, cloth and whatever, and
figure out how to put it together.  NO PROBLEM.

First selecting a character presented some problems since I am quite
giant economy size person.  This limits my choices in two directions:
practical--a 300 lb. swashbuckler does not make much sense; and
aesthetic--have no intention of subjecting people to me in tights.  I
fairly quickly decided
on a friar+s outfit.  This had several advantages.  First I had a role
model: Friar Tuck.  Second, since liturgical garb remained quite static
for many centuries I could fit into a wide range of time periods. 
Third, it looked fairly simple. Fourth, If I made a few mistakes, no
reasonable person would expect a mendicant cleric to be a fashion plate.
 Fifth, as an agnostic the irony appealed to me.  I researched whatever
pictures I could find in the local bookstore and go an image of what I
had in mind.

With the time constraints, obviously mail order was out of the question,
and I didn+t know many sources then anyway. Off to the exotic, for me,
world of fabric stores.  With the great help from my wife I found a
pattern, see below, and some cloth.  I would have preferred an all
natural fabric to
be more authentic, but the cotton-poly blend I found seemed the perfect
color and rough texture.  It is called Ghandi...I wonder what the
Mahatma would have thought.

In any case with the loving guidance of my wife I got it sewed up in
plenty of time, ("Yes, I know its three in the morning but I need to
finish this hood"), and had a great time at Medieval Times.  Not many
visitor wear costumes, so I didn+t have to worry about being compared to
anyone.  The
children seemed particularly impressed.  One mother took a picture of me
blessing her child.

I plan to try it out at a couple of Ren Faires later this year. 
Overall, I greatly enjoyed myself, and I+m thinking of ideas for
something to make next year.  If anyone has any good ideas for medieval
or renaissance costumes for
oversized people, male or female (my wife is a big beautiful girl) or of
period patterns in very XXL sizes I would be glad to hear it.

Well, you now know FAR too much about me.

Pattern Review

After all the exotic sources, I hate to admit it, but my pattern was
McCalls 5665 View A.  It is supposed to be a wizard, but in the right
fabric, with the trimming removed, it looked a lot like a friar or monk.
 I used leftover
material to make a knotted belt and found a leather cross which I hung
on a leather thong around my neck.

I had to alter the pattern to be larger (I didn+t know anything about
sewing but I+m fairly good at drafting and geometry) and I sewed up the
front so that it goes on over the head.  The pattern was fairly easy to
do but my wife says see thinks Simplicity has better directions.

Anyway, I am enjoying this mailing list even though a lot of it goes
over my head.

          Thanks
          Guy

------------------------------
From: "Sarah Randles" <srandles@sequoia.itd.uts.EDU.AU>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 94 12:15:28 EST
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Historical Costumers' Symposium

I've just caught up with the mail on the digests after a few weeks absence  
so this is a little out of date, but:

David McDonald writes, in response to my suggestion of setting up a
Historical Costumers' Symposium:

>Great idea!  Where do we start?  I have also been avoiding CC for the
>very reasons expressed in the previous post.  

Well, having read the stuff about the conference in Canada, it seems
that this may serve our purposes quite well, so it might be worth
waiting for reports on how it went, what it was like etc.  On the other
hand, if we want to set up something ourselves (and I for one would
argue from personal bias that we need something international), I would
suggest that a good place to start is to find someone who would be
prepared to host/organise it.  I would volunteer, but I don't think
Australia is the best place to start, if this is to get off the ground. 
It would be ok later on when it's established and could afford a small
turnout at one conference. I would like to see the presenters at such a
conference producing papers which could then be bound and marketed as
"Proceedings of the xth Conference of the International Historic
Costumers' Association" too. Any volunteers?

Sarah Randles
S.Randles@uts.edu.au

------------------------------
From: "Sarah Randles" <srandles@sequoia.itd.uts.EDU.AU>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 94 12:32:44 EST
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Buffyisms

Having read some of the stuff on the digests in response to my initial
Buffy statement, I realise that it could come across as being somewhat
bitchy - not really my intent, and I would like to point out that I make
every effort to help those who want to create authentic costume. 
However, there are times when a costumer's just gotta laugh,
_tactfully_.  I'm sure some of my early efforts had the real costumers
rolling in the aisles. (The v-necked gown trimmed with the fluffy
swansdown that I was alergic to, with the matching hennin that my
_friend_ describes as the Kenwood Chef cover, spring to mind.)  I hope
my recent efforts don't have the same effect.

Also in response to the comment about deliberate Buffyism - this can be
quite fun, and educational.  I have deliberately made the white satin t-
tunic with every mistake in the book.  It was done as a joke, but I
think it would make a good teaching tool - things people can laugh at,
without laughing at anyone in particular. 

Sarah
S.Randles@uts.edu.au

------------------------------
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 17:37:24 PDT
From: Cindy <cindy@ccmail.caere.com>
Subject: Beginner biography and mundane pattern review

>In any case with the loving guidance of my wife I got it
>sewed up in plenty of time, ("Yes, I know its three in the
>morning but I need to finish this hood"), and had a great
>time at Medieval Times.  Not many visitor wear costumes, so

   Guy, Bravi!

   You two deserve applause for having the aplomb to pull off a first
costume and admiration for bothering to do any research at all! Many
folks consider a few Hollywood films to be adequate research.

   Being XXL or pregnant is rarely fashionable, but occurs in all
periods and places.  It's those of us with the figure of a 14 year-old
boy who must claim to be "wan and consumptive" (having tuberculosis) in
19th c. parlance.

                                     --cin
                                     cin@caere.com

------------------------------
From: rain@netcom.com (Leslie Blitman)
Subject: toiles
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 1994 00:52:37 -0800 (PST)

Don't know if anyone mentioned this already, but there's an article in
the current Threads about draping a bodice and taking a basic pattern
from it.

Leslie
rain@netcom.com

------------------------------
From: wtmp18185@ggr.co.uk
Date: 18 Mar 94 13:18:00 BST
Subject: Suggestions

I would like to add my congratulations to Guy, with a warning.  Unless
you are careful, you are about to launch in to a hooby/obsession which
will take over your life!  It doesn't seem to be something people do
half-heartedly!

Having said that, you asked for suggestions for periods which suit
larger people.  Being on the large side myself (padding is not really
necessary for late 16th middle-class alas), I would like to suggest the
early 16th century - specifically 1520s to 1530s (English by the way). 
Have a look at some of Holbein (or Breugel, well the Dutch 1550's is not
too different), Henry VIII or, for women, Holbein's Lady Guildford.  It
may not be fashionable, but she doesn't look as though she was ever put
down for not being slender!  A period which uses bones, in moderation,
is also very comfortable for a lady with big boobs - oh the bliss of a
well-cut boned bodice - I never want to put a bra back on!

Someone mentioned gingham instead of calico.  English gingham (here we
go again) is too flimsy - it would distort badly if you tried to pin
tightly. Calico has clear lines in the weave, and I suspect (never
having used it) that the coloured lines would 'carry the eye' and
distort the process. After all, part of the idea is to find out where
the body is not symetrical.

Caroline

------------------------------
From: JLIEDL@nickel.laurentian.ca
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 1994 10:00:42 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Colours of Mourning (longish)

Back in December I cross-posted an H-Costume request for information on
mourning dress and custom to the Renaissance discussion group, FICINO. 
Here are the results (I believe an earlier post was lost):

The duke who grieves for his dead wife in Chaucer's _Book of the
Duchess_ is all in black--Chaucer mentions it twice (l. 443 and 457).  I
don't know if this proves that it was customary to wear black when
mourning throughout the Middle Ages, but clearly by 1369 when the poem
was composed it was somewhat of a tradition.
Susannah Chewning
Drew University
schewnin@drew.drew.edu.
------------------------

Very detailed descriptions of funeral practices are in the Northwestern
University doctoral dissertation by Roger Laurence Mitchels, "In the
Midst of Life":  The Aristocratic Funeral Ceremony in Early Modern
England, 1450-1700 (Evanston:  1979). See also Clare Gittings, Death,
Burial and the Individual in Early Modern England (London:  Croom Helm,
1984), which
focuses less on the aristocracy but is consistent in its description of
their practices. (from a footnote of mine in an article in progress on
Sidney and his funeral.)  --pg
Peter Graham   psgraham@gandalf.rutgers.edu   Rutgers University
Libraries 169 College Ave., New Brunswick, NJ 08903
(908)932-5908; fax (908)932-5888
---------------------------

A good visual representation of the colours of mourning in
sixteenth-century England is present in the marvelous painting "The Life
and Death of Sir Henry Unton" by an unknown artist of the late 1590s. 
It hangs today in London's National Portrait Gallery.  In this work the
mourners are attired in black and would seem to satisfy Victorian tastes.
--Michael M. Holmes, McGill
(Brit-pop star Morrissey: "I wear black on the outside because
black is how I feel on the inside.")
---------------------------

The "Life and Death of Sir Henry Unton" painting referred to by Michael
Holmes (quite appositely) is reproduced conveniently, though in small,
in the Riverside Shakespeare.--pg
Peter Graham
---------------------------

I suppose Hamlet's "customary suit of solemn black" might be relevant.
Alan Rudrum, Department of English, Simon Fraser University,
Burnaby, B.C.,Canada.
Telephone (604) 263-7321 (H) (604) 291-3125 (O).
Alan_Rudrum@sfu.ca
---------------------------

Lawrence Stone discusses English aristocratic funeral practices in _The
Crisis of the Aristocracy_, and Richard Greaves discusses them in
_Society and Religion in Renaissance England_.  In funeral processions,
which the College of Arms attempted to regulate very closely, all
mourners typically wore black, though the status of mourners was marked
by the fact that
mourners of different social classes were furnished with blacks of
different quality cloth and amount of material. 
Interestingly, this tradition, and the College of Arms' control of it,
was breaking down at least by the late sixteenth century as some funeral
for rich merchants included members of the deceaseds' companies marching
in the colorful (not always black)  robes of their orders.
Sir Philip Sidney's funeral, in fact, included the Lord Mayor and
Aldermen of London "in gownes of violet faire" and the "gentle crew" of
grocers "richly attired with their liuery hoods on their shoulders,"
according to a contemporary report by John Phillip. I think the colorful
mourners in Sidney's funeral represent a significant but increasingly
common shift in the conventions of funeral processions during the late
sixteenth century.  I've written about this in an article entitled
"Pageantry and Poetry as Discourse:  The Production of Subjectivity in
Sir  Philip
Sidney's Funeral," in _ELH_ 57 (1990) 
Ron Strickland
Illinois State University
-------------------------

See also Julian Litten, The English Way of Death.  The Common Funeral
since 1450 (London, 1991).  This is heavily illustrated.
Fritz Levy
History
University of Washington
_________________________

A bit esoteric, but these may also be useful:
On French royal funeral ceremonial (which presupposes that black is the
standard color of mourning... hence the importance of the exceptional
red robes of the presidents of the Paris Parlement): Ralph Giesey, *The
Royal Funeral Ceremony in Renaissance France.* On French and English:
Ernst Kantorowicz, *The King's Two Bodies* (Princeton 1957), pp. 409-437.
Kris Zapalac
History
Washington University in St Louis
kzapalac@artsci.wustl.edu
-------------------------

Can anybody identify the source of this mourning color scheme? Is there
a biblical reference, or is there a tradition of black much older than
the
middle ages?
James Owens
--------------------------

checking my handy Eerdman's Analytical Concordance, I found under
"black": Jeremiah 4:28: "earth shall mourn, and the heavens above be
black."  Perhaps more relevant, though, is the description of Judith,
who "wore sackcloth around her waist and dressed in widow's clothing"
(Judith 8:5, 10:3, 16:8).  Even Genesis 38:14 assumes that there is a
specific garb for widows without -- of course -- describing it.
Oops,... just glanced again at my bookshelf and saw Smith's Bible
Dictionary.  Re: "Mourning" he lists i.a.: "black or sad-colored
garments, citing II Samuel 14:2; Jeremiah 8:21, etc.
Hope this helps,
Kris Zapalac
------------------------

And for myself, let me note that the only exception to black as a colour
of mourning I know of in the western tradition is that royal widows in
France were supposed to wear white.  See references to this in the dress
of Henry VIII's widowed sister after her brief royal marriage.

Janice Liedl
Laurentian University, Canada
JLIEDL@NICKEL.LAURENTIAN.CA~

------------------------------
Date: 17 Mar 94 23:33:00 EST
From: "Gina Balestracci" <BALESTRACCI@saturn.montclair.edu>
Subject: magazine article

FYI--The March 1994 issue of Period Living & Traditional Homes, an
English magazine that is available in the USA at some bookstores, has an
article called "Brief Encounters" on p. 36.

It's about Rosemary Hawthorne, a vicar's wife and former actress who has
what looks to be a marvelous collection of historical clothing--I want
the corset on p. 37! :-) 

I have no way of evaluating any of the information, since it's pretty
subjective and it's just a short article (2 pp. of text).  Is she a
British Cora Ginsburg? Perhaps some of our participants from the UK
could fill us in on her collection.

gb

------------------------------
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 94 08:07:19 PST
From: aterry@Teknowledge.COM (Allan Terry)
Subject: Patterns

The main sources I used for my history of the pattern articles, which I
drew on for my recent post, are:

Arnold, Janet.  _A Handbook of Costume._  London:  Macmillan, 1973.

Dickson, Carol Anne.  _Patterns for Garments._  Ann Arbor:  University
Microfilms, 1976.  [Doctoral dissertation.]

Kidwell, Claudia B.  _Cutting a Fashionable Fit._  Washington: 
Smithsonian Institution Press, 1979.

Waugh, Norah.  _The Cut of Men's Clothes 1600-1900._  New York:  Theatre Arts
Books, 1964.

Waugh, Norah.  _The Cut of Women's Clothes 1600-1930._  New York: 
Theatre Arts Books, 1968.

I also used information from Arnold's _Patterns of Fashion_ series,
articles from _Dress_, and company history provided by the
Vogue/Butterick, Simplicity, and McCall's pattern companies.  I believe
the reference to Roman monks came from Dickson's dissertation.

According to Waugh, "From medieval times down to the beginning of the
nineteenth century the general practice was to cut from patterns.  These
were flat shapes of the different parts of the garment.  Simple
measurements were also taken and recorded.  The tailor laid the pattern
on his material and drew it out with chalk, altering the shape where
necessary to suit his measurements."  

Kidwell, discussing 18th-century tailoring, says "A tailor usually kept
patterns in different sizes.  . . .These patterns were so important that
in England tailors sometimes referred to them as 'Gods.'  When preparing
to cut a garment for a customer the tailor selected a pattern of about
the right size.  He laid it on the fabric and traced around it with
chalk.  Next, using the customer's measure he checked the dimensions of
the outline, marking the necessary corrections in chalk."

The sources I listed contain a _lot_ more information on pattern history
than I can quote here.

de Alcega's 1589 work has been reprinted in facsimile plus translation
by Ruth Bean in Carlton, England under the title _Tailor's Pattern
Book._  It is widely available in used costume book dealers' catalogs
and may still be in print.

I think, by the way, that previous discussions on pattern making may be
somewhat confusing to novices.  At the risk of boring everybody else,
here are some clarifications.

The main ways of getting a pattern are:

* Copying an existing garment by measuring sections or pinning paper or
cloth over them.  Or even cutting them apart.  This is how amateur
clothing makers usually obtained patterns before patterns were widely
published in fashion magazines or sold by mail.  It is also how Janet
Arnold, Norah Waugh, and some historic pattern companies got their
patterns.

* Drafting--drawing out the shape, usually onto paper.  Period drafting
methods are discussed extensively in a number of books reprinted by R.
L. Shep.

* Draping--draping cloth over a person or dress form till the desired
shape is achieved. According to Kidwell, this technique was developed in
the 19th century.

* Flat pattern work--altering a very plain, very fitted basic pattern
till the desired shape is achieved.  This basic pattern is called a
sloper in America and appears to be called a toile in England.  The
sloper itself can be obtained by drafting, by draping (which is what
some English correspondents have been describing), or by buying and
fitting a commercial sloper pattern (which is the way we did it when I
studied dress design; mine was a Vogue or Butterick).  _The Costumer's
Handbook_, by Rosemary Ingham and Liz Covey, is a theatrical costuming
guide that explains how to drape a sloper.

The fitted basic garment is cut apart and traced onto cardboard. 
Whenever you want to create a pattern, you trace the sloper onto paper
and alter that by slashing/spreading and redrawing sections till you get
the style you want.  I gave instructions for creating historic styles by
the flat pattern method in my book _After a Fashion_; there are also
many good books written for commercial pattern designers.

Flat pattern alteration from a sloper is the method used to create
almost all ready-to-wear patterns, commercial sewing patterns from the
big companies, and some commercial reproduction patterns.  It does not
produce a better or worse fit than any other method.  The reason
ready-to-wear does not fit most people perfectly is not because paper
patterns are used.  It is because the patterns were fitted to a standard
dress form, not an individual customer.  The human body is not
standardized.

However, if you buy a commercial pattern in the same standard size, then
alter that pattern to fit your body, the sewn garment will fit just as
well as if you had draped or otherwise developed the pattern from
scratch.  (Or better, if you're not very experienced.)  The same goes
for reproduction patterns.

Incidentally, ready-to-wear and commercial pattern companies produce a
range of sizes only after producing the initial pattern.  Rather than
redrawing each size from scratch, they "grade" up and down from the
first-developed size.  Grading is a fairly mathematical process because
different parts of
the body increase/decrease different amounts.  These days most commercial
grading is done with a computer (sorry, I don't know of any PC programs).

Copying, drafting, grading, and flat pattern work are *all* learned skills.
Any novice can use them, but will have to learn in the process and put up
with some imperfect results.  Flat pattern work is considered easiest and
most efficient by "the industry," which is probably why draping has more
cachet.  As I mentioned, I think the method you prefer depends on your
temperament and experience.

Fran Grimble

------------------------------
Date: 18 Mar 94 19:07 GMT
From: SCM.MANKER@AppleLink.Apple.COM (Nichols, Kristen)
Subject: Re: Berry Stains

George,
I do not know how you can fake berry stains but I do have a suggestion.
Depending on the style of the dress/blouse would it be possible to have
a fake front that either snaps or is attached with velcro or pins that
you could put on the actress over her full dress. It would be an exact
copy of the front piece of the dress/blouse Depending on your material,
you could take it off of her and throw it in the wash quickly to get the
stains out...and you wouldn't be washing the whole outfit nightly. Or,
if the stains do not come out, you would only have to replace that
section for each performance.
K-
 

------------------------------
From: Gregory Stapleton <gregsta@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 94 14:17:26 TZ
Subject: Grommet Setters

Does anyone know where I can obtain a pair of grommet setters that punch
the hole in the fabric as it sets the grommet?  A friend has a pair of
these she got from her mother and she has never seen another pair of
these.

thanks,
gregory

------------------------------
From: BPH3213@VENUS.TAMU.EDU
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 1994 13:48:04 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Civil War uniform video      

 I have come across and ad for an 83 minute VHS video on Federal Civil
War uniforms. (Dixie Gun Works, Tenn. $39.95).  Has anyone on the list
seen this?

It claims to "examine in detail over 50 authentic uniform components"
using original specimens from the Smithsonian and elsewhere. I would
like to hear any comments anyone may have on this, and whether or not it
is useful/worth the price etc.        Bryan  College Station, TX 
BPH3213@VENUS.TAMU.EDU   
 
---------------------------- End of Volume 75 -----------------------

