From: Gretchen Miller <grm+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 1994 18:26:12 -0500 (EST)
Subject: H-Costume Digest, Volume 76, 3/22/94

The Historic Costume List Digest, Volume 76, March 22, 1994

Send items for the list to h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu (or reply to this message).

Send subscription/deletion requests and inquiries to
h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

For archives of this digest, send mail to close@lunch.asd.sgi.com

Thanks and Enjoy!

---------------------------------------------------------------
Topics:
Mourning dress/Colors of mourning
Non-mourning black
Berry stains
Query: Appropriate color for afternoon tea dance
More good looking costumes for larger folks
Question: Walking sticks
Threads magazine

----------------------------
From: sclark@epas.utoronto.ca (Susan Clark)
Subject: mourning dress
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 1994 17:28:06 -0500 (EST)

Hello all--
 I have no idea whether this is a reference to proper mourning dress, 
byt Margaret Wade Labarge's _Simon de Montfort_ discusses what Eleanor
Plantagenet wore after the death of her first husband--and russet is
mentioned as the colour most appropriate to widows and those who had
taken vows of celebacy. Russet, is, of course, one of the easiest dyes
to obtain and is thus associated with poverty.  Since widows were always
considered 'poor" in the eyes of the Church (regardless of income) and
thus under Church protection, the connection is obvious. However, I have
no idea whether this was considered mourning dress for the rest of the
population, or whether it was merely the 13th century equivalent of
"widow's weeds".

 Cheers--
  Susan Carroll-Clark
  University of Toronto
  sclark@epas.utoronto.ca
  

------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 94 15:36:07 PST
From: Loren_Dearborn@casmail.calacademy.org (Loren Dearborn)
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Black as NON mourning garb...

I seems to remember reading somewhere that black was worn as a basic
color in non-mourning dresses as well during the Victorian era (usually
in shiny fabrics).  Is this true? If so for the entire era or only one
part?  When looking at old b&w photos it's hard to tell if the dresses
are black or
navy, but some of the ones I've seen do seem to substantiate this.  I'd
love to make a nice black dress and not have to be assumed to be in
mourning!

          Loren Dearborn
          ldearborn@calacademy.org

------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Berry Stains
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 94 15:38:27 PST
From: Elizabeth Miles <emiles@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu>

George Angell wrote:

> [...] Is
> there any combination of fabric and fake "berry juice" that would come clean
> in the wash? Any other ideas?

I'm not sure about fake berry juices, but a technique I use to protect
pots from the soot of fires may work... in the case of the pots, I take
a paper towel with some dish detergent and cover the exterior before
placing it over the fire; the soot just rinses off, regardless of how
long it sits after dinner.  You might try soaking the blouse concerned
in a similar soap solution and letting it dry, and then test-staining it
with the juice to see if the soap helps prevent the stain.

The actress may have to be careful about suds if she gets too
enthusiastic smearing the berries, though. :)

Pojundery-

Elizabeth
Elizabeth_Miles@hmc.edu

------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Black as NON mourning garb... 
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 94 16:59:38 PST
From: Walter Nelson <Walter_Nelson@rand.org>

Loren
Black was definitely worn by men after about 1855, for almost all
occasions, day or evening.  In fact, for anything but the informal (in
the Victorian sense) sack suit, black was the only acceptable color for
the coat, and was often worn for trousers, hat and vest as well (the
alternative shade being charcoal gray).

Women also, particularly in the 1870s and 80s, seem to have worn black
frequently, simply because it looks classy, especially in the silks and
other light fabrics that were popular in the bustle era.  I have several
photographs in my collection of women who appear to be wearing black,
and some of them are posed with their families.  I have seen a fair
number of pictures from the 70s and 80s of women in black, and fairly
few from the 50s and 60s of women in black.

I think the distinguishing feature between full mourning and a black
dress is the lace veil worn in full mourning.

Of course, this is all from memory, and I can quote no citable sources. 

Spanish and Latin American women also seem to have been extremely fond
of black (odd, considering the weather in their part of the world, but
there it is).

Cheers,

                              Walter Nelson

------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 1994 17:03:24 -0800 (PST)
From: "Lizbeth Langston, UCR Physical Sciences Library"
<LANGSTON@UCRAC1.UCR.EDU>
Subject: appropriate color for an afternoon tea dance?

Hello, everyone-- I will be going to a 4:30-8:30pm tea dance -- Ragtime
era. I have a question on appropriate women's attire for a dance held at
that time of day.  I know that dress is not as formal as later in the
evening.  All I have seen for early-century afternoon wear in photos,
costume books, and fashion mags tends to show white or ecru soft linen
or cotton dresses, with pleats, tucks, and French embroidery-type trims.

Is that characteristic? I am particularly interested in "later Ragtime
era," that is 1912-1918.

My hidden agenda:  I will be trying a pattern for the first time and
happen to have some light grey linen/cotton on hand that I'd like to
use.  Is that appropriate?  [I don't want to make a social faux pas] If
so, what, if any colors may I use for trim, topstitching, contrasts,
etc.? Shall I stay with grey, or may I use a brighter color, such as
red, violet, or green?

Also, I know that the "Exotic" look (bright colors, dramatic designs)
came in with the Ballets Russes, but want to know if that translated
into afternoon wear, as opposed to evening wear.

Thanks very much:
Lizbeth Langston
langston@ucrac1.ucr.edu

------------------------------------
Date: 19 Mar 94 01:36 GMT
From: SCM.MANKER@AppleLink.Apple.COM (Nichols, Kristen)
Subject: Re: Suggestions

Another suggestion for Guy's wife is a Spanish surcote. Sorry, I do not
have dates off of the top of my head. Could someone provide them for
him. I do know there is a VERY easy description on how to make one in
Janet Winter and Carolyn Savoy's book Elizabethan Costuming. I do not
know how historically acurate their garment is, but it may suit your
purpose.
K-
 

------------------------------------
Date: 19 Mar 94 01:33 GMT
From: SCM.MANKER@AppleLink.Apple.COM (Nichols, Kristen)
Subject: Re: Colours of Mourning (longi
 
>a colour of mourning I know of in the western tradition is
>that royal widows in France were supposed to wear white.  See
>references to this in the dress of Henry VIII's widowed sister
>after her brief royal marriage.
 
>Janice Liedl
>Laurentian University, Canada
>JLIEDL@NICKEL.LAURENTIAN.CA~
 
There are also references to Mary Queen of Scots wearing white after the
death of her 1st husband, the Dauphin of France. If is rather ironic
that she also wore white at her wedding.
K-
 

------------------------------------
From: ERSZEBET BATHORY <orsino@apple.com>
Subject: The Etiquette of the Walking-Stick
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 94 15:40:29 PST

Greetings. 
I was referred to this address by someone on the Sherlock Holmes mailing
list. I would like to get some information from costumers or anyone else
in the know, pertaining to the various kinds of walking sticks carried
in Britain during the latter half of the 19th century and on into the
early part of the 20th, to wit: class and gender distinctions associated
with them, materials of which they were made, the significance of the
shape of the handle, the general significance of sticks themselves,
gestures one might make with one's stick, and so on. Referrals to
helpful books would be lovely too.

I'd like to know more about this address, too. The person who gave it to
me said that it is a theater-oriented mailing list...?

Thank you very much.

Erszebet Bathory

--------------------------------------------------------
Sometimes    Erszebet Bathory
terrible things happen   
quite naturally...   orsino@apple.com

------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 1994 08:50:20 -0700 (MST)
From: DIANA PATTERSON <DPATTERSON@mtroyal.ab.ca>
Subject: Non-mourning black

Black is an interesting subject--how black _is_ black?  In about 1759 (I
can look up the date if anyone is really interested) the Society for the
Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (now the Royal Society
for Arts--and still in the same location in London) put out a request
for submissions for dyes that were really _black_.  The RSA library
still has a sample of one of the pieces of fabric in their
correspondence book.  Now if people are still trying to get a good black
in 1759, what did black look like in the Renaissance?  
 Black, by the way, was _very fashionable_ during the Interregnum for
the puritans, and in all painting of the period, including those
wonderful Dutch domestic paintings, the black is very black indeed.  But
was it in reality black any more than the faces were unblemished by pox
marks or moles or warts?
Diana Patterson
Mount Royal College
Calgary
DPatterson@MtRoyal.AB.CA

------------------------------------
Date: 20 Mar 1994 12:22:14 U
From: "George Angell" <george.angell@ac.hillsdale.edu>
Subject: Black as Mourning

 Subject:                               Time:12:14 PM
 OFFICE MEMO Black as Mourning          Date:3/20/94
Just a note: The traditional color of mourning in Scandanavian countries is
*white*. See Strindberg's _Ghost Sonata_.

------------------------------------
From: E.Jannoo@bnr.co.uk
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 94 11:52:38 GMT
Subject: Re: toiles

>Don't know if anyone mentioned this already, but there's an article in the
>current Threads about draping a bodice and taking a basic pattern from it.

What is "Threads"? If you are talking about a USENET newsgroup, what is
the name of the group?

Ed Jannoo - jannoo@bnr.co.uk

------------------------------------
From: Gregory Stapleton <gregsta@microsoft.com>
To: grm+@andrew.cmu.edu
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 94 09:36:35 TZ
Subject: Re: toiles

Hi, Ed:

It's a sewing (and related pursuits) magazine published on this side of
the pond.  I've only read a couple of issues, but it seems to be of very
high calibre as far as content goes.

yours in service,
gregory
----------

------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Non-mourning black 
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 94 08:50:24 PST
From: Walter Nelson <Walter_Nelson@rand.org>

Black was popular with Puritans for two reasons.  The first, it looks
sober and sedate, which suited well their religious view, but it was
also popular because it was the favorite color of the merchant class
from the mid 16th Century to, perhaps, the 20th.  The Calvinist movement
was very strong among the merchants.  It was also the favored by
doctors, lawyers, clergymen and magisrates.  It was the badge of the
respectable. (Note, Puritans of the Peasant and Artisan classes did not
generally wear black--it was too expensive and would probably have been
considered a bit uppity)

It's tough to say how black black was, but I for one am reluctant to
dismiss the evidence provided by Dutch painters of the 16th and 17th
Centuries (as some people of my acquaintance have done) as being
unreliable and tainted by some artistic desire to achieve an asthetic
ideal at the expense of verismillitude.

While paintings cannot be taken as absolute proof of the color of one
dye or another, I think they can be taken as positive evidence in that
direction.  Not everyone's faces WERE pock-marked and warted then, just
as not everyone's are now, and many portraits were done, "warts and
all".  The Dutch painters (and others as well) were trying hard to
achieve a compelling depiction of reality, and the subtlties of the
shades they achieve show that they were not trapped by primitive paint
technology into depicting the world in primary colors.

If Hoefnagel or Breugel shows something as black, I for one, think it
probably was (have a look at the Lord and the Priest in Breugel's
"Wedding Party").

Cheers,

                              Walter Nelson

------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 94 09:05:36 PDT
From: Cindy <cindy@ccmail.caere.com>
Subject: mourning dress

Hello all--
 I have no idea whether this is a reference to proper mourning  dress, 
byt Margaret Wade Labarge's _Simon de Montfort_  discusses what Eleanor
Plantagenet wore after the death of her  first husband--and russet is
mentioned as the colour most  appropriate to widows and those who had
taken vows of celebacy.  Russet, is, of course, one of the easiest dyes
to obtain and  is thus associated with poverty.  Since widows were
always  considered 'poor" in the eyes of the Church (regardless of
income)  and thus under Church protection, the connection is obvious. 
However, I have no idea whether this was considered mourning dress  for
the rest of the population, or whether it was merely the  13th century
equivalent of "widow's weeds".

Susan,

   Eleanor, what a gal!  Not too many women get to marry 2 kings of 2
different countries.  Or go on the First Crusade and live to tell the
tale.

   I thought Eleanor of Aquitaine had her first marriage annuled.  Her
family was so powerful, owning 1/3 of what is now France, that she even
got her dower property back. So why was she in mourning for Phillipe of
France?  They apparently had something of a tiff that became worse when
the 2 daughters found out they were suddenly considered bastards and
unable to inherit.  Her 7 or so kids by Henry II of England (Henry
Plantegenet) included Richard the Lionhearted (Richard III) and John
Lackland who's featured as King John in "Robin Hood".

   All that aside, widows still may have worn russet. Dont know. As for
taking of holy orders and vows of celebacy, the uniform depends on the
order.

   Who's Simon de Montfort?  A contemporary of Eleanor?  Did she make
some eye witness account of mourning for a Ex, who in the eyes of the
church had never been a relation?

   Confused,
         --cin
         cin@caere.com

------------------------------------
From: JLIEDL@nickel.laurentian.ca
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 13:39:55 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: non-mourning black

I largely agree with Walter Nelson's post regarding non-mourning black
as a popular colour with a broad range of European society (mercantile &
upper classes) from about 16th c. on (I would amend that to approx. 1400
onwards).

The real problem was not so much in getting a true black (though that
existed--there were reported problems of rusty blacks, purply blacks and
so forth; especially with cheaper dyes and fabrics), the real problem
was durability of the colours!  Black dyes were notorious for easily
fading and needing to be re-dyed to restore their colour.  Light,
washing, just plain time could break down the dye chemicals and "wash
out" the colour. For the 16th/17th take on this problem, consult a work
like Alciatus' Book of Secrets.  (Also has period recipes for
drycleaning!)

So the real accomplishment of modern chemistry has been in giving us
true & lasting black dyes!

Janice Liedl
Laurentian University, Canada
JLIEDL@NICKEL.LAURENTIAN.CA
---------------------------- End of Volume 76 -----------------------

