From: Gretchen Miller <grm+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed,  6 Apr 1994 18:52:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: H-Costume Digest, Volume 87, 4/6/94

The Historic Costume List Digest, Volume 87, April 6, 1994

Send items for the list to h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu (or reply to this message).

Send subscription/deletion requests and inquiries to
h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

For archives of this digest, send mail to close@lunch.asd.sgi.com

Thanks and Enjoy!

---------------------------------------------------------------
Topics:
Costuming Tradition
Historical Dance Class/Recital, SF Bay area
Retrieving back issues of the digest
Bye-bye "elegance"
Pheasants
Question and answer: Technical work on clothing manufacture

---------------------------
Subject: Re: Costuming Tradition 
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 94 11:41:51 PDT
From: Walter Nelson <Walter_Nelson@rand.org>

Caroline
You ask "who comes up with these rules?" (referring to the Ren Faire
costume guidelines).  The answer is really nobody.  These rules
originated with someone of course, but since their birth, they have been
subjected to the "folk process", and have long ago become independent of
any research.  They are simply handed down by word of mouth from
generation to generation.  I used them as an example, because they are
the worst I have ever encountered.  My point however is that such
absurdities can become enshrined in tradition even in the most
"authentic" group.

I don't think we are really in disagreement about Venetians, though I
think there is some confusion over terminology.  What you are calling
"slops", I am lumping under the heading of Venetians.  I have seen the
term slops used to indicate trunk hose, as well as the bulbous knee
britches of sailors. I think we are saying the same thing, but using
different terms.  Of course, one must always be careful about
terminology in the pre-industrial age.  Every thing had many names, and
every name could name many different things.  And, to make things even
worse, people have been making up new names for old things for centuries
(e.g. the "Main Gauche" for the fencer's dagger).  I guess the trick is
to constantly define one's terms.

That's an interesting point about pheasants.  I will have to look into
that.  I have a Medieval hunting book that has about every critter known
to the European ecosystem. The protopheasant should be in there.

No need to hide your virtual head in virtual shame.  Clearly, you take
the time to do research, which is more than can be said for far too many
of those who claim to be historical costumers (present virtual company
excepted).

Cheers

                              Walter Nelson

---------------------------
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 94 14:06:24 PDT
From: Cindy <cindy@ccmail.caere.com>
Subject: SF Bay Area Lecture

April 18, 1994     -  Richard Powers teaches 19th Century dancing

Monday evening from 8-10 at the Palo Alto Masonic Temple, 461 Florence
St.  Call 415.856.8044 for details or try isaacs@hpcc02.corp.hp.com via
InterNet.  Admission ~$10

April 15, 1994     -  Historical Dance Recital

The entire Stanford Historical Dance Ensemble will perform as they did
at the Smithsonian.  Richard Powers will show his slides and give an big
lecture on Dance research and appropriate costume. Also included: how
costume affects (has affected) dance style and vice versa. 8P, Roble
Gym, Stanford University.  No charge.

---------------------------
From: close@lunch.asd.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: ADMIN: Back Digests Available Via Remote Means.
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu (Historic Costume)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 1994 18:14:01 -0700 (PDT)

I'm pleased to announce that historic costume digests are now available
for automatic retrieval, via e-mail.  All of the back digests, going
back to the inception of this list, are currently available this way. 
If I run out of room I'll have to remove some to tape, but they are all
there for now!

Note, though, that they are available in a slightly different format
than digests you currently receive.  Currently digests are numbered by
volume numbers as they come from Gretchen's machine, but that is too
difficult to duplicate via remote storage so, in this archive, digests
are stored by year/month/day of creation, rather than by volume number.

To get an index of available back issues of this list, send a message
with the words:

    index h-costume

in the body of the message, to majordomo@lunch.asd.sgi.com.  Then use the
command:

    get <hcos.yymmdd>

to retrieve the volumes you want. 
-- 
Diane Barlow Close
 close@lunch.asd.sgi.com
 I'm at lunch today.  :-)

---------------------------
From: close@lunch.asd.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: ADMIN: Elegance goes :-)
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu (Historic Costume)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 1994 18:34:46 -0700 (PDT)

Oh, I forgot to mention... I updated the welcome message (and passed it
on to Gretchen to incorporate on her end) to reflect the fact that the
back digests are now available remotely, and I finally decided to chuck
the word "elegance" from the group description and replace it with the
simple "costume".  All you living history people can now cheer quietly. 
:-D
-- 
Diane Barlow Close
 close@lunch.asd.sgi.com
 I'm at lunch today.  :-)

---------------------------
From: close@lunch.asd.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: One teeny correction to retrieval instructions.
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 1994 20:13:58 -0700 (PDT)

You guys probably would've figured this out eventually, but I missed a
step in those retrieval instructions.  The correct way to get back
issues is:

To get an index of available back issues of this list, send a message
with the words:

   index h-costume

in the body of the message, to majordomo@lunch.asd.sgi.com.  Then use
the command:

   get h-costume hcos.yymmdd
       ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^

to retrieve the volumes you want.
-- 
Diane Barlow Close
 close@lunch.asd.sgi.com
 I'm at lunch today.  :-)

---------------------------
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 1994 23:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Heather Rose Jones <hrjones@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Pheasants

On Tue, 5 Apr 1994, Walter Nelson wrote:

> That's an interesting point about pheasants.  I will have to look into
> that.  I have a Medieval hunting book that has about every critter known to
> the European ecosystem. The protopheasant should be in there.

That would be the ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). "Birds in
Medieval Manuscripts" by Brunsdon Yapp notes the earliest certain
appearance (in manuscript illustrations) in the mid-14th century
Luttrell Psalter, with a possible (if so, badly drawn) late 13th century
example in the Windmill Psalter. The book notes that the pheasant was
introduced into England in post-Norman times.

Heather Rose Jones

---------------------------
From: bednarek@tidalwave.med.ge.com (Dennis Bednarek Mfg 4-6971 ~BHOSVWZ#097)
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 94 02:55:54 CDT
Subject: Re: Pheasants

> From: Heather Rose Jones <hrjones@uclink.berkeley.edu>
> 
> > On Tue, 5 Apr 1994, Walter Nelson wrote:
> 
> > That's an interesting point about pheasants.  I will have to look into
> > that.  I have a Medieval hunting book that has about every critter known to
> > the European ecosystem. The protopheasant should be in there.
> 
> That would be the ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). "Birds in 
> Medieval Manuscripts" by Brunsdon Yapp notes the earliest certain appearance 
> (in manuscript illustrations) in the mid-14th century Luttrell Psalter, 
> with a possible (if so, badly drawn) late 13th century example in the 
> Windmill Psalter. The book notes that the pheasant was introduced into 
> England in post-Norman times.

Yes I'm glad you mentioned introduced.  Pheasants are NOT native to
either the America's or Europe.  They were introduced to both of our
western continents from our eastern neighbors.  However it is
interesting to note that it happened way back in the 13th century for
our European neighbors.  Or was that just for England with the European
mainland getting its introduction earlier?

dennis 
 
---------------------------
From: J.A.Bray@bnr.co.uk
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 94 09:41:48 BST
Subject: Re: Costuming Tradition

>1.      Pheasant is not royal (so far as I am aware ..) but it is a game
>bird and subject to the Game Laws, so anyone wearing pheasant fethers not
>of a suitable social status (ie to go hunting or associated with it) might
>have to answer some awkward questions.  The Breugal child wearing a peacock
>feather might be in the same situation - except peacocks cast their
>feathers, so I suppose he could have picked it up ...

Pheasants moult aswell. We held a training weekend near a wood with
pheasants. Pheasant's tail feathers were lying around on the ground, by
the end of the weekend, there were a load of Viking warriors wandering
round with pheasant feathers tucked into the brim of their hats. The
really silly bit was that most of them were wearing spangenhelms, so
they'd tucked the feathers into the steel band round the rim of the
helmet :-)

---------------------------
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 1994 06:46:37 -0600 (MDT)
From: DIANA PATTERSON <DPATTERSON@mtroyal.ab.ca>
Subject: Technical Work on Cloth Manufacture?
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu

I have for some time been interested in how certain fabrics were made,
especially pre-industrially, but even post would do.  How, for instance,
is cre^pe made?  How do they did they make tulle?  I have read fairly
widely in the works put out in the late 17thc. and early 18thc. when
groups such as the Royal Society were interested in the crafts, and
tried to write these things down.  I have found little or nothing on
fabric.  Can anyone help?  Such a work, especially if European, might
help us all figure out what calico was _then_ as opposed to now--calico
was, by the way, forbidden, at least according to Defoe, in the late
17th c. because Queen Mary had made it too popular and it was
undermining the wool trade.  Someone finally figured out that wool
singlets worn next to the skin itched. (See _A Child's Christmas in 
Wales_.)
Diana Patterson
DPatterson@MtRoyal.AB.CA

---------------------------
Date: 5 Apr 94 23:50:00 EST
From: "Gina Balestracci" <BALESTRACCI@saturn.montclair.edu>
Subject: cloth manufacture

A couple of sources for information on post-industrial revolution cloth
manufacture would be the U Mass-South Dartmouth campus library (one of
the original components of this campus was the New Bedford Textile
Institute) and the New Bedford Textile Museum (a new and small
enterprise, but they seem to have their act together.  They've published
a wonderful book on the strike of 1928 whose author is on the faculty at
U Mass-SD).  If anyone is in the vicinity of New Bedford (on the way to
Cape Cod. follow the signs for 
Howland Place) it's worth a stop.  They've got some looms from the now
defunct Berkshire-Hathaway mill: Jacquard and some other types.

I would also imagine that the National Historic Site at Lowell would
have some good information, as well as the library at U Mass-Lowell
(what used to be Lowell Tech had a textile component at one time, I
believe).  The whole 
restoration was just beginning when I graduated from what was then
Lowell State College, and I haven't been back.

All of this is, of course, post-industrial revolution.

gb

---------------------------- End of Volume 87 -----------------------

