From: Gretchen Miller <grm+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 1995 19:10:05 -0500 (EST)
Subject: H-Costume Digest, Volume 209, 1/16/95

The Historic Costume List Digest, Volume 209, January 16, 1995

Send items for the list to h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu (or reply to this message).

Send subscription/deletion requests and inquiries to
h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Enjoy!

---------------------------------------------------------------
Topics:
ISO List of US theater costuming departments
Smithsonian reproduction fabrics
Sources for costume related books
Illustrations in "Costume in Detail"
Question and answer: Pattern for mid-19C man's suit
ISO Suggestions for costume research in France
Janet Arnold's underwear book
Victorian waist size and ideal vs actual fitting
Queen Margot and Restoration
ISO Hair pieces
Earliest period/country for farthingales
ISO Info on working with linen

---------------------------
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 95 08:30:06 PST
From: aterry@Teknowledge.COM (Allan Terry)
Subject: Miscellaneous comments

Does anyone on this list know where I can get a list of theaters or
theater costuming departments, with US mail addresses?  I'd appreciate
any info.

The latest issue of _Threads_ says a second Smithsonian fabrics
collection, called the Little Sister collection, will be out in May. 
Patchworks' catalog says they will carry all the Smithsonian collections.

The Scholar's Bookshelf Fine Arts catalog often carries costume-related
books at a small-to-substantial discount.  Selections in their latest,
Winter, catalog include:

_The Book of Silk_ by Philippa Scott
_Costume 1066-1990_, by John Peacock
_A Survey of Historic Costume_, by Phyllis Torora and Keith Eubank
_The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Costume and Fashion from 1066 to the
Present_, by Jack Cassin-Scott
_Fashion in the French Revolution_, by Aileen Ribeiro (an excellent book
and substantially discounted)
_Textiles, 5,000 Years:  An International History and Illustrated
Survey_, edited by Jennifer Harris
_Greek Footwear and the Dating of Sculpture_, by Katherine Dohan Morrow
All the Medieval Craftsman series, including Armourers, Embroiderers,
and Goldsmiths
_Jewellery in Britain 1066-1837:  A Documentary, Social, Literary, and
Artistic Survey_, by Diana Scarisbrick  (I ordered this one)

There are also many books on painting, illuminated manuscripts, and
period interiors.

The catalog is free.  The address for inquiries is:

The Scholar's Bookshelf
110 Melrich Road
Cranbury, NJ 08512

Sorry, there's no phone number in the catalog and I mailed in the order form.

Fran Grimble

---------------------------
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 10:45:11 -0600 (CST)
From: Deb <BADDORF@badorf.fnal.gov>
Subject: RE: "Costume in Detail"

>I had heard before and                    v[Nancy Bradfield]
>also could tell that many of the gowns she drew were from Janet Arnold's 
>books (it seemed like the majority were in fact) but I could not find any 
>credit given to Janet Arnold anywhere.  Am I missing it?? Or is there 
>some strange reason she left her name out?           Erin K Gault

Are you sure she didn't just have access to the same museum/sources 
that Janet Arnold visited?   In that case, there would be no particular
reason to cite Arnold.   I don't have either book handy to check.

Deb Baddorf

---------------------------
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 09:38:49 -0800
From: Alison Kondo <kondoa@ucs.orst.edu>
Subject: Costume in Detail

 I use both Arnold & Bradfield a lot, they're good coplements to each
other...I think most of the garments shown in both books are in
reasonably public collections & both women documented them for their
books seperately.

 Alison

---------------------------
From: Christopher Adaline <caadalin@mtu.edu>
Subject: mid 1800's suit..
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 12:57:16 -0500 (EST)

This is kinda a general post, but it's my first to this group. :)
Does anyone have a pattern for a suit from the mid 1800's (long cut, 3-4
button, vest, shirt w/ striaght collar and windsor knotted tie.) that
they want to sell (or give me a copy of :)? Thanks...

-- 
         Deacon Evil, keeper of the Darkness: caadalin@mtu.edu 
The .sig may be lame but check out my .plan (finger caadalin@pace1.cts.mtu.edu)

---------------------------
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 12:12:07 -0800 (PST)
From: "erin k. gault" <gaulte@elwha.evergreen.edu>
Subject: Re: "Costume in Detail" (fwd)

On Wed, 11 Jan 1995, Deb wrote:

> Are you sure she didn't just have access to the same museum/sources  that
> Janet Arnold visited?   In that case, there would be no particular
> reason to cite Arnold.   I don't have either book handy to check.
> 
> Deb Baddorf

Well, I thought of that too but I seem to remember Raiments or Amazon or
someone saying in their little blurb of the book that it is a complement
to Arnold's book, meaning that she used Arnold's book as her basis. 
Just 
thought I'd ask.

*****************************************************************
*             Erin K. Gault  Evergreen State College  *
*          Eglentyne de Gaulle  College of Witt's Haven         * 
*            Barony of Glymm Mere, Kingdom of An Tir            *
*              e-mail: gaulte@elwha.evergreen.edu             * 
*****************************************************************

---------------------------
From: Title-L_at_NCTSW-N92@smtpgw.nctsw.navy.mil
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 95 15:52:09 EST
Subject: Re: Costume in Detail

 <I use both Arnold & Bradfield a lot, they're good
<coplements to each other...I think most of the garments 
<shown in both books are in reasonably public 
<collections & both women documented them for their 
<books seperately.
<
 <Alison
 
 
 During the reception/question-and-answer session after one of Ms.
Arnold's presentations at Agecroft Mansion in Richmond (I think it was
last Spring), someone showed her a recent children's book on daily life
in the 16th century, in which several detailed watercolors of men's
clothing, and the process of a man's getting dressed, were clearly taken
directly from drawings in one of her books.  Her comment was that, while
using direct reproductions of her drawings could be prosecuted, she had
no legal defense against people redrawing/drawing from her work, no
matter how close the resemblance.
 
   If you notice, Bradford uses sketches;  in the cases where these
parallel Arnold's she could have done her own, with the positioning of
the garment drawn dictated for both artists by its display position in a
museum case or some other factor of preservation, or by the logic of
items to be emphasized in the drawing - or maybe both artists worked
from similar photos done during preservation - or she could have redrawn
some of   Arnold's work as she has redrawn garments from period
paintings or manuscripts!  Any other possibilities?  You've got me
curious now - I'll have to compare the two books at home tonight for
parallels to each other and to other sources!
 
 Lynn
 
 mice, fabric and homemade beef jerky really do mix -
  but not in the same drawer 
 
 
   ---------------------------
Subject: Costume research in France
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 95 14:52:23 MST
From: "Cindy Murrell" <cmurrell@acs.ucalgary.ca>

I have a grad student who will be going to France for three months.  She
is researching men's 18th century costume and would like advice on
museums, libraries, collections which she should visit.  I would greatly
appreciate any addresses and suggestions. Unfortunately, our library is
not as good as I might wish in the
area of European resources.  Thanks in advance for any help.

Cindy Murrell
Univ. of Calgary Library
cmurrell@acs.ucalgary.ca

---------------------------
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 22:39:48 -0500 (CST)
From: Cindy Johnson <cindyj@nuchat.sccsi.com>
Subject: Re: Janet Arnold Books

When I saw Ms. Arnold speak in Richmond, VA in the fall of '93, I asked
her exactly this question.  She told me that the book was scheduled to
be published eight months prior to when I spoke to her but that it had,
as yet, not been completed.  Since the book is now two years behind, I
suspect it is quite likely about to be published.  I don't know which
publisher is handling it, though.  (Comments from the peanut gallery?)

Ms. Arnold also told me that there were plans in the works to film her
lectures and distribute them through PBS.  I've heard nothing about this
project since that time.  Has anyone else?

Cindy Johnson

On Tue, 10 Jan 1995, Lassman, Linda wrote:

> In the text to her earliest-period book, Janet Arnold talked about putting 
> out a volume covering things like chemises, corsets and other undergarments 
> of the period which were not properly speaking tailored items, but which 
> would be of interest to modern costumers/re-creaters/costume historians.
> 
> Does anyone know what ever happened to that project?
> 
> - Linda Lassman
>   Winnipeg, Manitoba
> 
> 
---------------------------
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 95 20:45:31 PST
From: aterry@Teknowledge.COM (Allan Terry)
Subject: Miscellaneous

Christopher Adeline asked about men's suit patterns for the mid 1800s.
R. L. Shep has reprinted several Victorian tailor's pattern drafting
manuals chock full of such patterns.  You can enlarge them by projecting
or the grid method rather than following the drafting instructions.  For
sewing and tailoring instructions I'd recommend a modern tailoring
manual.  Shep's address is:

R. L. Shep
Box 668 
Mendocino, CA 95460

Re Erin Gault's post about Victorian dress sizes: From my observation as
a collector, the 1850s and 1860s were not periods of strict corseting.
However, a lot of surviving 1880s bodices are very small, not only in the
waist but in the back width, ribcage, and even the bust.  Though not all
of them are, you can find very wearable 1880s dresses.  Some of the
1890s bodices are just as small but in general they are bigger.  Women
have gotten noticeably taller from the turn of the century on.

I'm not sure where people get the stereotype of the super-small
Victorian waist.  It was a period ideal, but in any period few people
live up to the ideals.  I suspect some lied about their measurements.  

My mother was born in 1913 (hey guys, I came along late in her life) and
she told me a story about her grandmother, who of course was a
Victorian.  When my mother was a little girl her grandmother used to
take her along when she went shopping.  The Victorians also had an ideal
of very small feet.  My great-grandmother had large feet but didn't want
to admit it.  So when she went into a shoe store she'd ask the
salesperson to bring her a size 2.  The salesperson would measure her
feet and bring the much larger size she actually wore.  The salespeople
were too tactful to comment, so my great-grandmother was able to
maintain the illusion that she had small feet.

Also, when I was taking formal clothing design courses the students
usually made clothes for themselves.  We were allowed to make them for
other people, but the instructors supervised the fittings and it was a
nuisance to bring outsiders into the class to be fitted.  Anyway, at the
beginning of every course we teamed up in pairs to take detailed
measurements. The instructors always emphasized that we had to use our
_real_ measurements.  Just the same I was always hearing people say
things like "Write down my waist as three inches less than that, I'm not
normally this size but I had a big dinner last night."  Some people
designed clothes from a sloper a size or two too small and then had to
redo everything during the fittings.

On a slight tangent: Ever see those 1870s dresses with the prominent
abdomen?  This past weekend I wore one of them.  I've worn my 1870s
dresses occasionally before, but this was the first time I'd worn this
dress.  The
bodice fit perfectly.  The overskirt was draped in front and back, which
gave part of the look.  But also there was a thick, pleated ruffle
around the overskirt waist.  I couldn't figure out why, since it didn't
provide visible decoration (it went under the bodice).  When I put the
dress on I realized the sole purpose of the ruffle was to make the waist
thicker and the stomach bigger.  I looked like I'd gained at least 10
pounds or become at least three months pregnant.  This period ideal
takes some getting used to.

Fran Grimble

---------------------------
From: Mrs C S Yeldham <csy20688@ggr.co.uk>
Date: 12 Jan 95 09:43:00 GMT
Subject: Films

Someone asked a while ago about a film called 'Margot', whether anyone
knew anything about it.

'La Reine Margot' has just been released in the UK, reviewed in todays
paper.  The director is Patrice Chereau, starring Isabele Adjani, Daniel
Auteuil and Virna Lisi as Catherine de Medici.  Based on a Dumas novel
it is about the wedding in 1572 of Marguerite de Valois and Henri of
Navarre (later Henri IV of France) which sparked off (debate) the St
Bartholemew's Day Massacre.  It is described as a 'febrile swoon',
'marinated in gore and lovingly trimmed with the finest brocade'.  Apart
from that there is no review of the costumes! It sounds like a
voluptuous romp, and if I get to see it I shall comment on this list.

The other film mentioned was 'Restoration'.  This is being filmed at the
moment with, I think, Sam Neill as Charles II, and is based on a book of
the same name (sorry, I haven't got the authors name to hand -  I can
find
it at home if it is felt to be useful).  The book is not about the
Restoration of Charles II, it is much more odd than that.  The main
character becomes doctor to Charles II's spaniels, marries one of
Charles's mistresses, spends time in a Quaker-run madhouse and generally
sees from the top to the bottom of Stuart society.  Well worth a read,
but more from a literary than historical point of view - very
post-modern.

I have just seen '1492, Conquest of Paradise' with Gerard Depardieu.
Interesting - I was very uncertain about Isabella's gowns.  Were they
wearing farthingales in Spain in the 1490s?  The skirts were surely too
wide to be supported on anything else.   In England I would give a
definate NO, but maybe in Spain they were - any comments?

Caroline
Ora Pro Nobis

---------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1995 9:33:07 -0600 (CST)
From: Deb <BADDORF@badorf.fnal.gov>
Subject: re: Victorian waist sizes

>I'm not sure where people get the stereotype of the super-small Victorian
>waist.  It was a period ideal, but in any period few people live up to the
>ideals.  I suspect some lied about their measurements.  

One other source for the super-small waist concept:  The Amazon catalog,
while telling you how to measure to order a corset, mentions that the
18" (or whatever) waist claimed during Victorian times was usually the
corset measurement.   And, naturally, there has to be 3-5" of extra
room, so that you can pull the laces tight.   You never make a corset to
your exact measurements, or you can't pull it any tighter than "closed".
   So if you claimed a 23" waist  (read:  23" corset)  you might
actually have a 28" waist.    

Deb Baddorf             baddorf@fnal.gov

---------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1995 13:33:32 -0800
From: maynard@figaro.Eng.Sun.COM (Alexandra Rankin Ohlson)
Subject: fake hair

Mum's going to a ball and has short hair. She's got a snood and would
like to attach and stuff it with moderately similar hair. I know it's
not historic, but you reenactors prolly deal with it. No time to collect
her own, and don't want to pay real hair prices. Where can one go to buy
switches or other fake hair pieces?

Thanks,
alexandra

---------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 95 19:28:07 PST
From: aterry@Teknowledge.COM (Allan Terry)
Subject: Farthingales

Caroline asked whether farthingales were worn in Spain in 1492. 
According to _Hispanic Costume 1480-1530, by Ruth Matilda Anderson,
hoops began to appear in Spain in the 1460s or 1470s.  At first they
were worn on the outside of the skirt, covered with rich fabric, as a
decorative feature.  By the mid 1530s the upper classes wore their hoops
concealed, but the lower classes still used them as decoration.

Queen Isabel was fond of hoop skirts.  She had many in her inventory and
was recorded as wearing a hoop skirt in 1473 to receive Burgundian
ambassadors. Her confessor Talavera published some text (I'd have to
look in the bibliography for the title, but Anderson gives quotes) that
claimed hoop skirts were invented to conceal the results of immoral
behavior.  (This claim was also made when hoops were reintroduced in the
18th century and again by the Victorians.)

The Spanish hoops were called "verdugos," which I believe was the origin
of the English term "farthingale."  Woolen cloth was packed around the
hips below the hoop skirt.

In 1501 the English noted that Catherine of Aragon and her ladies were
wearing hoops.  By 1507 the Italian authorities (near Venice) passed
sumptuary legislation against hoops.  The French were wearing hoops
before
the mid 16th century.

Hope this helps.

Fran Grimble

---------------------------
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1995 21:07:37 -0800 (PST)
From: "erin k. gault" <gaulte@elwha.evergreen.edu>
Subject: linen

I just bought some linen (normally 22.98/yd on sale for 6.00/yd) and I'm
planning on making a cotehardie with it.  My problem is that I can't
remember if you can wash linen in the washer and dryer or do you have to 
handwash is?  Also, do I need to preshrink?  Thanks for any help!

*****************************************************************
*             Erin K. Gault  Evergreen State College  *
*          Eglentyne de Gaulle  College of Witt's Haven         * 
*            Barony of Glymm Mere, Kingdom of An Tir            *
*              e-mail: gaulte@elwha.evergreen.edu             * 
*****************************************************************

---------------------------- End of Volume 209 -----------------------

