From: Gretchen Miller <grm+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 1995 18:40:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: H-Costume Digest, Volume 346, 7/20/95

The Historic Costume List Digest, Volume 346, July 20, 1995

Send items for the list to h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu (or reply to this message).

Send subscription/deletion requests and inquiries to
h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Enjoy!

------------------------------
Topics:
Free Fittingly Sew disks
Review of pattern drafting software
British Museum collection on CDROM?
Question and answers:Elizabethan corset and accessories
Unsubscribing from h-costume
Irish Lace
Question: Smithsonian 18th C clothing project
Answers in the archives

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: DENISE@HARV-EHS.mhs.harvard.edu
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 09:54:41 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Fittingly Sew
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu

You can get a FREE demo disk (make sure you specify Mac or Windows), by
calling Bartley Software Inc. at 1-800-661-5209.

Maybe after enough of us have tried the various software, we could have
a discussion about their useability for drafting historic costume
patterns?

Denise Zaccagnino
(Lady Deonora Ridenow in the SCA)

------------------------------
From: close@lunch.engr.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: Re: Fittingly Sew Demo
To: DENISE@HARV-EHS.mhs.harvard.edu
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 09:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu

DENISE@HARV-EHS.mhs.harvard.edu wrote:
> You can get a FREE demo disk (make sure you specify Mac or Windows), by 
> calling Bartley Software Inc. at 1-800-661-5209.

You can also ftp a demo from cs.uwp.edu (I think the directory is
/pub/msdos/fido/cf-sew, but you'll have to check that once you get there
as my memory is faulty and I didn't write it down; the cf-sew is
correct, so just look around for that under /pub), or in the UK you can
ftp it from doc.ic.ac.uk (/recreation/crafts/fido-cfdn directory). 
These sites have demos of Fitting Sew for Windows and for the Mac, as
well as a demo of the first incarnation (version 1.1, June, 1992) of
Personal Patterns called "PC Patterns", and there's fairly complete
reviews of Dress Shop 2.0 and Personal Patterns too (they're under the
directory called cf-nfo.)

The files are called: 

  fswindem.zip                (Fittingly Sew Windows Demo; cf-sew)
  fsmacdem.sea, fsmacinf.sea  (Fittingly Sew Mac Demo and Info; cf-sew)
  pcpat.zip                   (PC Patterns demo; cf-sew)
  pers-pat.zip                (Personal Patterns Review; cf-nfo)
  dresshop.zip, dressho2.zip  (Dress Shop 2.0 Reviews Parts 1 and 2; cf-nfo)

> Maybe after enough of us have tried the various software, we could have a 
> discussion about their useability for drafting historic costume patterns?

Excellent idea!  I think that which software you like will depend on how
you like to work.  Here's my personal take on it after playing around
with several demos:

Dress Shop 2.0:  This program gives you many (100 or more?) existing,
non-changeable patterns.  Under the "pants" category, for example, is
jeans, single-pleated pants, double-pleated pants, stirrup pants,
leggings, etc., with options for fly front, no fly front, side or back
zip opening, elastic waistband, etc.

You enter your measurements (LOTS of them; over 100) into the computer
and select the pre-existing pattern you want to sew and it prints it out
in your size, with the vast majority of alterations you'd need to make
for your figure-type already done.

Once the pattern is printed out, of course, you can make additional
changes.  So in theory you could search the pattern database for
existing styles that come close to the historic style you wish to make,
print out that and then adjust it via slash-and-spread or whatever flat
pattern changing system you choose to use.  (The theory being you'd a
least have a starting pattern that fits you and only you.)

Apparently Dress Shop 2.0 files are able to be shared (awkwardly,
although it does work) with Autocad.  Once in autocad, you can make
changes on-screen to the pattern, itself.  So if you did have autocad,
the theory is you'd make one of the existing DS2.0 patterns fit you, and
only you, export it to autocad and then make changes to that pattern *in
autocad* (like make quadruple pleats in your pants, for example) before
you'd print it out.  That still sounds like a lot of additional bother
to me...

With Personal Patterns, you enter a number of measurements (not as many
as DS2.0) into the computer and it caculates a sloper.  You print out
that sloper and then hack'n'slash it to create your pattern (or use it
to check an existing pattern.)  The theory here being you'd be starting
with a sloper that fits you and only you.

IMHO, if you like to do all your changes to the flat pattern, as opposed
to on the computer screen, you'd be best off forgetting the computer
programs and just investing in the BonFit system.  That's a series of
plastic pattern templates with dials and sliders 'n stuff that you use
to create original flat patterns that fit your measurements.  Like the
Personal Patterns computer program, they start you with basic slopers
and you make the changes to those (through drafting or hack'n'slash) to
come up with the actual pattern.

The only advantage I can see to using the computer, at this point, would
be if you weren't the creative type, pattern-creation-wise, and wanted
to start with a base of existing patterns, like DS2.0 offers.

Personally, I like Fittingly Sew the best because it starts you with
basic slopers and you can *change them on-screen* to become whatever you
want BEFORE you print out the pattern.  But I work best fiddling with
shapes on-screen, and seeing the results before they're printed out,
rather than fiddling with large, flat expanses of paper and trying to
manipulate that. I don't work well on the flat...

With Fittingly Sew, you can take the basic pants sloper, for example,
size it to your size (with a series of measurements, just like the other
programs) and then start dragging and redrawing the pattern on-screen to
create, say, winged-harem-pants in your, exact size.  What you do with
the pattern is only limited by your imagination and general flat-pattern
contraints (you can't have a negative line, for example. :-)  

Personally, I think this is the most useful, for historic costuming
purposes, of the three programs.  The problem in historic costuming is
that often similar commercial patterns simply don't exist!  So it
doesn't help if the only thing a program allows you to do is print out a
really-big-poofy-dress simply because a really-big-poofy-dress is one of
the standard-supplied patterns.  What a lot of historic costume people
need to do is create the pattern from scratch, or from copying a drawing
of that pattern.  I think that Fittingly Sew in the only computer
program that will let you do that easily, on-screen.  Otherwise, you'd
be better off with one of the flat-pattern-modifying assistants like
BonFit.

That's my 2 cents on the matter.  I have no connections with any of the
above products, other than trying out all their demos (including playing
around with a friend's BonFit and having the company send me a copy of
their bodice-modification manual to view).
-- 
Diane Close
   close@lunch.engr.sgi.com
   I'm at lunch all day. :-)

------------------------------
From: Edward Wright <edwright@microsoft.com>
To: fishcat@hooked.net, h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 95 10:41:18 TZ
Subject: Re: Costumes on CD-ROM

| Personally, I want to see the entire V&A dress collection (or the Bath
| collection, among others) on CD-ROM -- full-length front & back view of
| each item.  This would be a wonderful aid to students of historical costume
| & it would also be a fantastic way to document the collection for
| posterity.

I have been told that the British Museum published its entire costume
collection on CD-ROM back in January.  I have never found anything about
this in writing, so I don't know if it's true, how much it costs, or how
to order it.

------------------------------
From: cpecourt@mhv.net
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 16:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Corsets

Hello
 Ok, call me crazy but I really want to try and wear one of those
corsets found under 15th and 16th century garments. My boyfriend thinks
I am nuts for wanting to squish my innards. I have some questions..
 1. Whats a good pattern and where to locate it?
 2. Whats a corset busk and a busk board?
 3. What to use for stays and where to get them? I have seen 
spiral ones but they look uncomfortable as the are round and the garment 
is flat...
 4. They did wear corsets under bodices right??
 5. How comfortable are they?
So those are my questions..

thanks
Chantal

------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 15:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jo Jann <joj@efn.org>
To: cpecourt@mhv.net
Cc: Costume List <h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Corsets

I too am looking for Corset information/patterns.  But what about the
ones worn on the outside? Or am I just dreaming? =)

------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 22:35:38 -0400
From: Zachary Kessin <zkessin@bedlham.com>
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: how to unsubscribe

If you would like to unsubscribe to a list do *NOT* send mail to the
list. send it to "h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu". The Subject line is
not relivent but the body should say
"unsubscribe h-costume email@host.com" nothing else. This address is not
going to a person but
to a computer and trying to be polite to it only confuses it. (Every
list I have ever been on has gotten sub/unsub requests every so often
but h-costume is by far the worst)

--Zachary Kessin zkessin@bedlham.com
x^n+y^n=z^n has no integer solutions other than 0 for n>2
I have a wonderful proof of this, but it won't fit in a .sig file.

------------------------------
From: "Hicks, Melissa" <MAH@cbr.smtpgate.amsa.gov.au>
To: grm+ <grm+@andrew.cmu.edu>, Costume List <h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: RE: Corsets
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 95 13:39:00 EST

>Hello
 >       Ok, call me crazy but I really want to try and wear one of those
>corsets found under 15th and 16th century garments. My boyfriend thinks I
>am nuts for wanting to squish my innards. I have some questions..
>        1. Whats a good pattern and where to locate it?
 >       2. Whats a corset busk and a busk board?
>        3. What to use for stays and where to get them? I have seen
>spiral ones but they look uncomfortable as the are round and the garment
>is flat...
>        4. They did wear corsets under bodices right??
>        5. How comfortable are they?
>So those are my questions..
>thanks
>Chantal

Chantal, to answer a couple of  your questions.  I can really only speak
for late Tudor as that is the period I am doing.

1. I have adapted a patterns from Janet Winter's Elizabethan Costuming
for the years 1550 - 1580; Jean Hunnisett's Period Costume for Stage and
Screen and Janet Arnold's sets.

2. A busk board is a piece of wood that went down the front of the
corset to keep it ultra flat.  Arnold explains in detail.

3. For stays I use flat, plastic covered, sprung steel (sort of similar
to steel packing tape). The boning we use comes in 1/4 and 1/2 inch
widths. I think this is fairly standard for members of the Society for
Creative Anachronisms and your local group will probably give your info
about locating supplies.

4. They wore corsets under their important clothes, for example high
Tudor or Elizabethan.  Many of the "lower class" women simply cinched
their bodices in tight which held them in place, so to speak.

5. Extremely !!!  Especially if you are well endowed.  They do NOT
squash your innards!  The whole point of these corsets was to give a
smooth line down the front. So basically your breasts and stomach were
squished in almost to your waist, however my waist measurement when I
wear my corset is 
slightly larger than it normally is.  It is the action of squishing the
breats that hold them in place.  This also gives the bosom style effect.
 Many of my well endowed friends agree that they are more comfortable to
wear than modern bras.  With modern bras, the weight of the breast is
held from the shoulder down and this can sometimes cause back pain.  A
renaissance corset on the other hand does not touch the shoulders.

Thier are also different styles of corset for different time periods. 
For example with straigh-waisted tudor, the corset stops atthe waist and
the stomach was hid under the skirt which ballooned out over a bell
farthingale (hoops). With a  Late Tudor, which had a slight point to the
waist, giving the inverted V effect, the corset goes down to the navel. 
For High Elizabethan the point extends well downto the end of the torso
area.  I have been told of one lady who had to sit with her legs
slightly apart becuase the corset point had to go between them when
sitting.

Although as I do both types of Tudor I wear the one style of corset
(late) and the fact that my stomach is held in slightly is hidden under
the farthingale anyway.

You may have trouble trying to wear this style of corsetry under modern
clothes.  To start with, your breasts will sit much higher.  Actually
just imagining the silhouette of a Renaissance corset under jeans and
T-shirt could be quite amusing 8-).

Yours
Melissa Hicks
SCA: Meliora de Curci
E-Mail: mah@amsa.gov.au

------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 23:57:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Katherine L. Rodman" <afn25136@freenet.ufl.edu>
To: cpecourt@mhv.net
cc: Costume List <h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Corsets

You're crazy, well we are now done with that and on to the questions at hand.  
1. Find a copy of Nora Waugh's "Corsets and Crinolines", this book will
answer most questions you have and also has great patterns.
2. Not having my copy of "Corsets and Crinolines" at home, I believe,
they are the front pieces used to open the corset without unlacing it.
We usually order ours from Greenburg and Hammer (I think).
3. You can get spiral boning and flat boning, depending on where you are
going to put it.  Once again, look in the book, it is a wealth of
information.
4. Contrary to the evidence put forth by Modanna and her ilk, underwear
is meant to be worn under your clothes.  Corsets are considered
underwear and should be worn under your bodice.
5. Having once popped out of my corset on stage in front of 500 people,
I can only say it depends on how the corset is built and whether or not
you like wearing large bones on your chest.  I personally think they are
evil and should be outlawed along with panthose, spike heels and any
piece of underwear called wonder anything.  Just my opinion.  Hope this
helps.

Kat
afn25136@freenet.ufl.edu

On Tue, 18 Jul 1995 cpecourt@mhv.net wrote:

> Hello
>  Ok, call me crazy but I really want to try and wear one of those 
> corsets found under 15th and 16th century garments. My boyfriend thinks I 
> am nuts for wanting to squish my innards. I have some questions..
>  1. Whats a good pattern and where to locate it?
>  2. Whats a corset busk and a busk board?
>  3. What to use for stays and where to get them? I have seen 
> spiral ones but they look uncomfortable as the are round and the garment 
> is flat...
>  4. They did wear corsets under bodices right??
>  5. How comfortable are they?
> So those are my questions..
> 
> thanks
> Chantal
> 

------------------------------
Date: 19 Jul 95 00:37:48 EDT
From: Agnes Gawne&Jeff Hamill <74150.375@compuserve.com>
To: H Costume <h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Irish Lace

delarorm@sce.com (RMd) asked:  "Is there Irish Lace?" 

Yes, there is.   Or at least, there was.  I am no scholar of lace but my
grandmother, who was raised in Ireland in the late nineteenth century,
was an accomplished lacemaker.  Unfortunately, she died before I had any
appreciation of textile arts.  I have one piece of lace that she made to
show us how it was done "In the old days".  I think I was about six
years old when she did it.  She started with a piece of fabric that
closely resembles tulle, except it was not stiff at all.  Then she used
a needle and thread to add on patterns, she made shamrocks.  It is
something like embroidery but very light and airy,  not heavy anywhere. 
I am sure a lace connoisseur would better describe it.  

I also have a postcard that appears to be an advertisement of the lace
making school she attended.  There is a photograph of the students and
apparently their teacher.  By the clothing on the women it appears to be
from 1905 or so... this would be consistent with her age.  Everyone in
the picture is wearing a lace ornamented pinafore or collar, except the
woman who appears to be the teacher. There are three pieces of lace
stretched on frames leaning in front of the class.  They look like the
piece of lace I described earlier.  The caption of the post card is as
follows (caps and returns included): 
 

 Attention is called
 to the exquisite Lace
 Turned out by the girls
 Who reside in this place.

 Limerick and Carrickmacross

 Both kinds are designed
 To suit customers taste
 And then Finished up
 With all possible haste.

 Try us and save yourself
 loss.

 Convent Lace Class, Castletown - Bere,  Co. Cork.

I am sure that there is still lace making in Ireland.  I imagine
Limerick and Carrickmacross are two styles as advertised on the old
postcard. 

 Also, there is a newssgroup called soc.culture.celtic that is read by a
lot of Irish people.  You might try posting a message there to get some
more information about choosing and purchasing Irish lace.  

I hope this information helps (or at least entertains.)

      Agnes Gawne

------------------------------
From: close@lunch.engr.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: Re: how to unsubscribe
To: zkessin@bedlham.com (Zachary Kessin)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 21:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu

> [how to unsubscribe info deleted]
> ... This address is not going to a person but
> to a computer and trying to be polite to it only confuses
> it. (Every list I have ever been on has gotten sub/unsub
> requests every so often but h-costume is by far the worst)

Actually for this list the messages sent to h-costume-request (the admin
address for unsubscribes) IS going to a person and NOT a machine.
Gretchen runs this list by hand.  There are no automatic filters on the
list, or anything like that.  That's why so many sub/unsub messages get
through if they're sent to the list address -- there is no automated
software to trap them.

We've been toying with the idea of moving the list to run off my
machine, "lunch", and it's Majordomo server (automated mailing list
software) for a while now.  One advantage would be automatic trapping of
sub/unsub messages; the disadvantages are strictly personal ones for us
admins. Lack of that human touch and all... :-)  No decision has been
made yet; we're still mulling it all over.

(If anyone feels strongly about it one way or the other, you can send
Gretchen and I private e-mail about it.  I'm close@lunch.engr.sgi.com
and Gretchen is grm+@andrew.cmu.edu)
-- 
Diane Close
   close@lunch.engr.sgi.com
   I'm at lunch all day. :-)

------------------------------
From: BPH3213@ACS.TAMU.EDU
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 0:17:16 -0500 (CDT)
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Smithsonian 18th c clothing project

Tonight I read an article of 1976 in Historic Preservation by Claudia
Kidwell of the Smithsonian.  In the article she states that the
Smithsonian had begun a project (about 1969) which sought to inventory
every known article of 18th century American clothing extant. 
Apparently in 1976 the project was still underway.  Does anyone known
anything about this? Did anything ever get published? Is Claudia Kidwell
still on staff at the Smithsonian?

I have the feeling nothing came of this project, or I'm sure by now I
would have come across something on it. It seems especially cruel to
tempt me by suggesting such a project was underway if it was never
completed! :-)

Bryan H     bph3213@zeus.tamu.edu   or Baloo@tamu.edu

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 95 01:48:19 -0400
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
From: kl94ag@badger.ac.BrockU.CA (Kathleen Leggat)
Subject: Re: Corsets

        Although I wear stiffened and boned bodices rather than corsets
(though this is about to change) I can, at least, partially answer a few
of your questions.

> Ok, call me crazy but I really want to try and wear one of those 
>corsets found under 15th and 16th century garments. My boyfriend thinks I 
>am nuts for wanting to squish my innards. 

        Yeah, but they look so damn good!

        Btw...the corset dates from the 16th century on.  There is
speculation of a type of corset being worn earlier for support and to
nip in the waist, the the corset really took hold during the 16th
century's abstract manipulation of the female form.  (men sometimes wore
them, too)

I have some questions..
> 1. Whats a good pattern and where to locate it?

        The best pattern is one designed for your measurements.  A
friend has provided me with an outline, but I haven't tried it yet.  (My
bodices are the result of duct tape patterns)  You're a Scadian, right? 
Your best bet is to attend an A&S class on corset making. 

> 2. Whats a corset busk and a busk board?

        A busk is a triangular piece of wood or boiled leather that
slips into a pocket in the front of the corset.  It is kept in place
with a ribbon threaded through holes at the top of the busk.  This
creates the firm point of Elizabethan and Jacobean garb.  (busk ribbons
were a popular favour for a
lover...)

        How you go about making one is beyond me.  I just fake it with a
double thickness of belting sewn together.  Could someone help us out?

> 3. What to use for stays and where to get them? I have seen 
>spiral ones but they look uncomfortable as the are round and the garment 
>is flat...

        Plastic coated steel boning is best...it's flat and keeps its
shape really well.  (Plastic boning can bend and before you know it, its
digging into some really important organ)  You might try a bridal
notions shop. And big SCA events usually have at least one merchant
selling steel boning.

> 4. They did wear corsets under bodices right??

        Yes.  Although I have found documentation for the stiffened and
boned bodice being worn alone.

> 5. How comfortable are they?

        It depends on how tightly you are laced and your figure type.
Technically they are only laced until you have a smooth line.  But some
people wear them to the point of creating bruises.  And since a big bust
has more to squish before it becomes a smooth line, they would be more
uncomfortable the bigger you are.  They generally aren't uncomfortable
unless you are laced too tightly.  Your posture changes, though. And the
point of an Elizabethan corset can be uncomfortable.  (This also depends
on
how low the point is...High Elizabethan frightens me!) You learn a whole
new way of sitting.  But if it fits properly, I can wear one all day
without discomfort.  (Hint...put on your stockings and shoes *before*
you put on your corset...leaning over can be a bitch!)

        Hope this helps.

        Kathleen (Catriona)

------------------------------
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 14:52:03 +1000
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
From: ser@adminserver.canberra.edu.au (Sarah Randles)
Subject: slipping straps

>From: "Hicks, Melissa" <MAH@cbr.smtpgate.amsa.gov.au>
>Anyway, I had problems with the pattern.  The sleeves keep slipping off
>the shoulder.  Has anyone experienced this?  How do you get dresses to
>sit on the point of the shoulder?

I think this has been discussed before, so there may be some useful info
in the archives - the method I use is a combination of angling the
straps in on the pattern rather than straight up or out, and tightening
the back of the bodice (this should do a lot towards solving the
problem.  I don't know of 
any evidence for a strap accross the shoulders.

Sarah
****************************************************************************
**********************************************
Sarah Randles                                             
ser@adminserver.canberra.edu.au
Research Office                                           Phone: (06) 201 2955
University of Canberra                                   Fax: (06) 201
5381/5999

------------------------------
From: "HEATHER ASPINALL" <ASPINALL@rsbs-central.anu.edu.au>
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
Date:          Wed, 19 Jul 1995 17:34:25 EST10
Subject:       Re: Irish Lace

Hi all,

In her recent post, Agnes was talking about lace that her grandmother made:

>done "In the old days".  I think I was about six years old when she did
it.  She
>started with a piece of fabric that closely resembles tulle, except it was not
>stiff at all.  Then she used a needle and thread to add on patterns, she made
>shamrocks.  It is something like embroidery but very light and airy, 
not heavy
>anywhere.  I am sure a lace connoisseur would better describe it.  

This description sounds like Carrickmacross lace to me. This is where
shapes made from very fine linen (or some other delicate fabric) are
appliqued onto a fine net background using decorative stitches. I don't
know a great deal about it off the top of my head  but my mother just
gave me a piece of Carickmacross  (which, indeed, had shamrocks on it)
which had a little information sheet accompanying it. I'll dig it up and
get back to you.

Cheers for now,
Heather
aspinall@rsbs-central.anu.edu.au

------------------------------
From: "HEATHER ASPINALL" <ASPINALL@rsbs-central.anu.edu.au>
To: h-costume@andrew.cmu.edu
Date:          Wed, 19 Jul 1995 17:50:44 EST10
Subject:       Re: Fittingly Sew Demo

I just wanted to say Thanks Diane for the great review of Dress Shop,
Fittingly Sew, etc. This is exactly the sort of personal experience
which is so great to have when you're trying to sort out what would be a
good software package to buy (or even a good flat package like BonFit).

Thanks again!

Heather
aspinall@rsbs-central.anu.edu.au

------------------------------ End of Volume 346 -----------------------

