From: owner-h-costume-digest (Historic Costume Digest)
To: h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Historic Costume Digest V3 #154
Reply-To: h-costume
Errors-To: owner-h-costume-digest@lunch.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk


Historic Costume Digest       Friday, August 4 1995       Volume 3, Number 154

Important Addresses:

  Submissions to the list:  h-costume@lunch.engr.sgi.com (or reply to
			     this message).
  Adds/removes/archives:    majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com
  Real, live person:        h-costume-request@andrew.cmu.edu

Topics:
    www site address for Bata Shoe Museum, Toronto
    Re:  H-Costume Digest, Volume 357, 8/2/95
    Re: pattern making
    Re[2]: H-Costume Digest, Volume 357, 8/2/95
    Shoes
    French Farthingales
    Costume collection in Seattle
    RE: Bata shoe museum and thanks
    shoes source (buckles too)
    Re: Re[2]: codpieces
    Re: Academic gown
    Real Kilts, Must Read.
    RE: Academic gown
    Pattern making
    Re: What do you wish you knew?
    Re: paper for patterns
    Re: What do you wish you knew
    Re[2]: Academic gown
    Re: French Farthingales
    Re: What do you wish you knew
    RE: What do you wish you knew
    "Orphan" Costume Collections
    Re: Academic gown
    Standards of Beauty
    RE: What do you wish you knew

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 03 Aug 1995 15:14:14 EST
From: MARINA <fedchenko@vax.library.utoronto.ca>
Subject: www site address for Bata Shoe Museum, Toronto

hi everyone,

for..................Bata Shoe Museum.....................
if you can access WWW have a look at the following address:

	http://www.hype.com/toronto/attractions/bata.htm

Shoes are an addiction to me so I am lucky to be only about 
10 minutes walk away from this new oddly shaped building.
I've been reading this listserv for about a year
but this is my first message to h-costume.

********** Marina Fedchenko ************************************
    email: fedchenko@library.utoronto.ca
snailmail: Science and Medicine Library, University of Toronto,
********** Toronto, Ontario  M5S 1A5 CANADA ********************

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 12:29:20 -0700
From: Susan Fatemi <susanf@rock.eerc.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re:  H-Costume Digest, Volume 357, 8/2/95

Re: University libraries of garments.  I wouldn't think that *every*
universiity would have one, only the ones with textile/costume programs.
Berkeley *used* to have a design dept. When they closed it, the material
goods went to the Lowie (now Hearst) Museum. As far as I know, they are
still housed separately and you have to have pretty good credentials even
to see them (I don't know if they are documented at all) The museum itself
has some garments and textiles, including a Fortuny outfit and Russian
ecclesiastical garb. Ren. chasubles, etc. A lot of Asian and Middle Eastern
stuff.

Anyone else know any stashes??

Susan Fatemi
susanf@eerc.berkeley.edu

(don't work at that museum, unfortunately)

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 15:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Irene Joshi <joshi@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: pattern making

On Thu, 3 Aug 1995, D. R. Leed wrote:
> When I try to make my-sized patterns from Janet Arnold or those 
> itsy-bitsy pattern layout pieces you see in costume books,  I first xerox 
> the piece I need, then tape it to the lower left hand corner of either a 
> [snip]

Wouldn't a Pantograph, (available I'm sure at art supply stores) 
be easier?

Irene Joshi

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 03 Aug 95 18:28:48 EST
From: KATHLEEN@ANSTEC.COM
Subject: Re[2]: H-Costume Digest, Volume 357, 8/2/95

The Brooklyn Museum used to have a very good costume collection. It may still 
be there, but they don't have the funds to display the clothing. Same with the 
Philadelphia Museum of Art. At one time, they set up a Costume Institute, like 
that of the Met, and even did an exhibition or two. Then for some reason, the 
whole thing died. Ive heard that the Philly museum has plenty of funds for 
ACQUISITION, but none for DISPLAY. Seems pretty dumb to me. The Chester County 
(PA) Museum has a nice collection of period wedding gowns and Quaker clothing. 
They do display once in a while and I think you can make an appointment to see 
the collection if you have a legitimate reason. The Valentine Museum in 
Richmond is supposed to have a nice collection (19th century, I think).

One of my fantasies is to have a National Museum of Costume, like the National 
Gallery of Art, connected to the Smithsonian or something like that, where all 
these orphan collections could be gathered, maintained, and displayed. It would 
have the funding they lack.

Speaking of which, does anyone know if the Royal Ontario Museum's costume 
institute is doing anything intersting these days? 

Kathleen
kathleen@anstec.com

------------------------------

Date: Thu,  3 Aug 95 13:42:05 TZ
From: Edward Wright <edwright@microsoft.com>
Subject: Shoes

To follow up the recent comment about wearing period shoes, women seem 
to have it much easier than men in this regard.  Just go into any shoe 
store and compare the range of styles available for men to the range of 
styles available for women.

Does anyone know a good source for historical shoes, especially for 
men?  I've seen Amazon Dry Goods' shoe catalog, but the prices are 
fairly high and I'm reluctant to lay out that kind of money without 
being able to see the quality of the shoes (or even the leather).  Has 
anyone here ordered any of these shoes?  If so, can you comment on the 
quality of the materials, workmanship, and service you received?  Does 
anyone have any other sources to recommend?

------------------------------

Date: Thu,  3 Aug 95 13:27:10 TZ
From: Edward Wright <edwright@microsoft.com>
Subject: French Farthingales

I didn't want to post this before I had a chance to verify this, but I 
checked Janet Arnold's "Patterns of Fashion" last night.  She agrees 
with Linthicum that the French farthingale was the padded "bum roll" 
rather than the cartwheel farthingale.  Can anyone point to a reputable 
primary or secondary source that indicates that "French farthingale" 
sometimes referred to the cartwheel farthingale?

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 17:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Irene Joshi <joshi@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Costume collection in Seattle

The Henry Art Gallery, at the University of Washington, has an extensive 
collection of both fashion and ethnic clothing and textiles.  It is well 
cataloged and indexed.  Each item is photographed and the record includes 
all the pertinent information about the piece.  Fabric, techniques, 
embroidery stitches, motifs, garment type etc are some of the index access 
points.  It is usually available for research purposes by appointment but 
the Henry Art Gallery is undergoing extensive renovation.  A new 
addition is under construction so the collection is closed for the next 
two years or so.  But once the "new" Henry is open, it will again be 
available and indeed there probably will be public displays of parts of 
the collection on a semi-regular basis.
Blanche Payne's book on the history of costume includes items from this 
collection and pieces from its ethnic materials are frequently 
illustrated in books and articles.  

------------------------------

Date: Thu,  3 Aug 95 13:45:19 TZ
From: Edward Wright <edwright@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: Bata shoe museum and thanks

| If any of you are planning on being in Toronto, you may be interested in
| visiting the Bata Shoe Museum. It's supposed to be the only museum in
| the world dedicated to footwear. It's at the St. George Subway Station,
| 327 bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1W7.

Funny.  Philadelphia also claims to have "the only museum in the world 
dedicated to footwear."  I wonder how many others there are?  :-)




 

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 19:45:43 -0500 (CDT)
From: BPH3213@ACS.TAMU.EDU
Subject: shoes source (buckles too)

I've heard Fugawee carries a decent assortment of shoes and shoe buckles. 
Has anyone had experience with this company? How is their stuff? 
Bryan
Baloo@tamu.edu

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 21:16:23 -0500 (CST)
From: Cindy Johnson <cindyj@nuchat.sccsi.com>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: codpieces

And, for those of you interested in wearing such garments, I have a friend
out in California who makes and sells the type of hosen and underwear
described by both Joe and Kathleen.  Really bugs her when people wear
danskins, apparently.  She'll be at Pennsic, last I heard.  Her SCA name
is Ginevra Francesca Pallucchini and her business is Black Swan Designs. 
Her prices are reasonable and the quality is very good.  She's done alot
of research to get these garments right, and she sells three different
varities of braes/hosen combinations (to accomodate a wide range of time
periods/places).  If you go to Pennsic, look her up and tell her Cassandra
sent you.  If you don't go to Pennsic and are interested in her wares, she
can be reached at: 

		Black Swan Designs
		L. Gwen Norwick
		(610)789-2299
		17228 Voorhes Lane
		Ramona, CA  92065-7109


Disclaimer:  I am in no way associated with this lady's business and
receive no profit or recognition of any variety for recommending her to
you.

Hope this helps,
Cindy Johnson

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 19:12:56 -0700
From: fishcat@hooked.net (Trystan L. Bass)
Subject: Re: Academic gown

Shirley Matheis <smatheis@dordt.edu> asked:
>Can anyone tell me if there is a commercial pattern for an academic gown?

Butterick 3820 has a simple graduation robe (like that used for high school
grad) and choir robes, plus a couple of stoles & collars.  They're not the
fully pleated & funky sleeved doctoral robes, but they could be used as a
basis for a more elaborate pattern.

Hope this helps!
- --Trystan

 fishcat@hooked.net      @->->-- Trystan L. Bass --<-<-@     TrystBass@aol.com
                                        http://www.hooked.net/users/fishcat/

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 22:44:25 -0400
From: SyRilla@aol.com
Subject: Real Kilts, Must Read.

To anyone interested in authentic tartan wear.  Have I found something very
interesting. In a bridal magazine named "Bliss the Magazine for Scottish
Brides",  I found this and few other advertisements for tartan wear.  I'll
copy down one of them.  If anyone would like more info. e-mail me.  Ladies,
they have wonderful dress design.  I would kill for one of the dresses in it,
It is that uniques of a bridal magazine.  (No "normal" wedding dresses here).

Highlander
Tartan Wear
Kiltmakers and Hire
Specialists

Kilts, Trew, Plaids,
Dinner Outfits Etc.
All of the Highest
Quality for Hire

New for 95' Scottish 
National and Black Watch
Tartans, Plus Morning
Tail and Frock
Coats for Hire

Also! Come and See the Burns Crystal
Factory Showroom - Highest Quality Cut Crystal
At Cut Glass Prices.  Ideal Wedding Gifts.

58 Bank Stre, Kilmarnock   (01563) 52439
25 Kyle Street, Ayr             (01292) 288808



There are more in the magazine if you need them.  I don't mind giving them
out.  I was thrilled just to find this small treasure of designs, so I don't
mind sharing.  

Kimberly D. Stockton

SyRilla@ aol.com
 
"Who said that I dress funny?"

------------------------------

Date: Thu,  3 Aug 95 16:11:52 TZ
From: Edward Wright <edwright@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: Academic gown

| Can anyone tell me if there is a commercial pattern for an academic gown?
| --

I don't know about commercial patterns, but Janet Arnold's "Patterns of 
Fashion: 1560-1620" contains reproductions of several cutting patterns 
for academic gowns.  You didn't say what period you're looking for, but 
those things haven't changed all that much since the 16th Century.

 

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 95 21:14:56 PDT
From: Allan Terry <aterry@Teknowledge.COM>
Subject: Pattern making

Dianne,

I see what you're trying to do but I think you're doing it the hard way.  

A scale pattern can be enlarged by hand gridding (which I assume you know
about), a projector, or a photocopier.  The latter two methods can be used
to enlarge the pattern to your bust size, and you can then adjust the rest
of the measurements on paper or in the muslin.  I prefer to enlarge scale
patterns to the original full size, cut a muslin from it, and do the rest of
the fitting in the muslin.  I have very good results with this method.  (I
once made up a 1790s pattern that was _exactly_ my size with no changes in
the muslin.)  But this may be partly because I'm very small by modern
standards.

My book _After a Fashion: How to Reproduce, Restore, and Wear Vintage
Styles_  has detailed, step-by-step, illustrated instructions for all three
enlargement techniques, plus pattern alterations and muslin fitting.  I can
send you more information on this book if you're interested.

_After a Fashion_ does not cover computer enlargement or fitting.  Frankly,
when I wrote it (in 1993) I thought no one would be interested.
Paper-and-pencil techniques work quite well and are a lot cheaper.  Most
people have access to a projector or copier without buying it.  However, the
discussions on this list are making it clear that people _are_ interested in
computer techniques.  So I will cover them in the next edition.

The advantage of pattern making by computer is that the computer can
understand measurements, thereby making scale enlargement and personal
fitting more easy and accurate.  However, your method does not fully utilize
this ability.  A scanner can only enter bit maps.  Bit maps have no
"knowledge" of what size the lines are, or even that these are lines as
opposed to, say, a scanned photo.  Even drawing programs are not designed to
do the sophisticated calculations needed for pattern making.

What is needed is a program that understands what size each line in the
pattern is and the relationships between lines.  It must allow you to alter
the size of individual lines and either adjust the proportions of the other
lines or not as you choose.  In short, you need a CAD program.  You can use
a generic CAD program like AutoCAD, but it's easier to use a specialized
pattern-making program.

Of course, you still need to enter patterns as lines with exact
measurements.  A digitizing tablet is best for this.  You set the desired
scale up on the digitizer and it automatically makes all the lines you trace
the right size.  (In terms of retaining the proportions of the original
pattern; fitting to your figure is a separate step done in the CAD program.)
Most (if not all) CAD programs support digitizers.

Hope this helps.

Fran Grimble

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 11:47:42 +0100 (BST)
From: Dorothy Stein <dstein@sas.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: What do you wish you knew?

I also understand that some painters, aware of changing fashions, and 
wanting to make their works good for all time, deliberately dressed their 
models in fantastical and/or flowing drapery that either suggested 
classical times or no particular time.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 07:27:40 +0500
From: artg@nchgr.nih.gov (Art Glatfelter)
Subject: Re: paper for patterns

For small pieces, especially those often used, such as headwear etc., we
have found that used x-ray film makes an excellent pattern "paper".  It is
water proof, can be written on and wiped clean with a solvent, does not
stretch under any normal circumstances, and I find the slight stiffness
eliminates the need for pins.  The one draw back is availability.  Still if
you come across any you might like to try it.

------------------------------

Date: 04 Aug 95 13:41:00 BST
From: Mrs C S Yeldham <csy20688@ggr.co.uk>
Subject: Re: What do you wish you knew

I think the thing I wish I had known when I started was to _believe_ what
the pattern/instructions/experts told me, _trust_ them, not to try to
impose my 20th century ideas about garments on period clothes, but to
approach them in a naive fashion, and do as instructed.  The two areas that
spring to mind are tightness and fullness.  Make the bodice tight - its
more comfortable, and put enough fullness in the skirt, not modern
skimpiness.

Probably impossible to convey to a starter, but thats my 2p worth.

Caroline

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 04 Aug 95 11:04:48 EST
From: KATHLEEN@ANSTEC.COM
Subject: Re[2]: Academic gown

Also, in answer to the question about academic gowns, "The Evolution of 
Fashion" has a [simplified] pattern for what we now know as an academic gown. I 
believe it is one of the men's 13th century patterns. I can look it up this 
weekend. If you have or can get a copy of the book, and look thru it, near the 
beginning of the book, you should be able to recognize it.

Kathleen 

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 04 Aug 95 10:58:35 EST
From: KATHLEEN@ANSTEC.COM
Subject: Re: French Farthingales

I believe that Ashelford's book on the visual history of clothing (16th 
century) shows a woman wearing the cartwheel farthingale and refers to it as 
the "French fasthingale." I have frequently seen the distinction made between 
the "regular" or cone-shaped hoop ("Spanish") and the cartwheel ("French"). The 
roll has been referred to as a "bumroll." I know this further confuses the 
issue, but that's what we're here for, to try and straighten out the 
misinterpretations, right? Has anyone checked Janet Arnold's "Queen Elizabeth's 
Closet...?" I'll try to remember to look up the references this weekend.

Kathleen
kathleen@anstec.com

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 08:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Catherine Kehl <tylik@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: What do you wish you knew

On 4 Aug 1995, Mrs C S Yeldham wrote:

> I think the thing I wish I had known when I started was to _believe_ what
> the pattern/instructions/experts told me, _trust_ them, not to try to
> impose my 20th century ideas about garments on period clothes, but to
> approach them in a naive fashion, and do as instructed.  The two areas that
> spring to mind are tightness and fullness.  Make the bodice tight - its
> more comfortable, and put enough fullness in the skirt, not modern
> skimpiness.

Here here.  My bodices started tight -- but only because I was a silly 
enough teenager to think such things might attract romantic attention.  

But the single thing I have seen that really ruins most early attempts at 
costuming has been unwillingness to use enough cloth.  Drape is 
everything....

					Catherine

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 10:56:38 -0500 (CDT)
From: Deb <BADDORF@badorf.fnal.gov>
Subject: RE: What do you wish you knew

>I think the thing I wish I had known when I started was to _believe_ what
>the pattern/instructions/experts told me, _trust_ them, not to try to
>impose my 20th century ideas about garments on period clothes, but to
>approach them in a naive fashion, and do as instructed.  The two areas that
>spring to mind are tightness and fullness.  Make the bodice tight - its
>more comfortable, and put enough fullness in the skirt, not modern
>skimpiness.

Good point -- I'll put in a second vote for that.  One rebels against
putting 3 or 4 yards of width into a skirt  (1779)  "I'll look fat!".
But I am now making skirts for a friend who says her original skirts
are not full enough (and they aren't).

And my tight bodice & corset are why I don't feel any hotter than I
do, on 95 degree days.  There is no trapped hot air,  and no sticky
skin-on-skin movement which you have in modern "loose" tops.

Deb Baddorf

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 09:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julie Cheetham <cheetham@u.washington.edu>
Subject: "Orphan" Costume Collections

If anyone is keeping a "tally" of orphan costume collections such as 
those described by Kathleen, another exists in the warehouse of The 
Museum of History and Industry in Seattle, Washington.  This institution 
has a large and excellent collection, but there is no budget or 
administrative interest in mounting displays--even with the assistance of 
volunteer labor.  Julie

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 95 9:54:30 PDT
From: Mirabelle Severn & Thames <naomib@sco.COM>
Subject: Re: Academic gown

Questions about sewing academic gowns have come up two
or three times on the newsgroup alt.sewing, and there
might be a FAQ there, or someone on the group might be
able to post a summary of the discussion.  As I recall,
someone managed to add some very good information based
on first-hand examination of several gowns for different
degrees.

Naomi Brokaw

------------------------------

Date: 4 Aug 1995 10:02:53 U
From: "Carole Newson-Smith" <carole_newson-smith@mac.net.com>
Subject: Standards of Beauty

                                           8/4/95       9:58 AM
                                       Standards of Beauty
A few years ago I saw a movie about Lilly Langtry, who was one of the lovers of
Prince Edward, Queen Victoria's son.   Lilly was considered one of the most
beautiful women in England at that time.   Since then I have seen photographic
evidence that Lilly would not be considered a great beauty in our time.

If tastes in physical appearance have changed that much in a hundred years,
then it stands to reason that persons who were regarded as having great beauty
or handsomeness in an earlier century might not look that good to our
twentieth-century eyes.

Perhaps it is merely my subjective view on this topic, but the standards for
beauty (or handsomeness) in women seem to have changed more than those for men.

Carole Newson-Smith
(Cordelia Toser in the SCA)

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 11:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Catherine Kehl <tylik@u.washington.edu>
Subject: RE: What do you wish you knew

On Fri, 4 Aug 1995, Deb wrote:
 
> Good point -- I'll put in a second vote for that.  One rebels against
> putting 3 or 4 yards of width into a skirt  (1779)  "I'll look fat!".
> But I am now making skirts for a friend who says her original skirts
> are not full enough (and they aren't).

One of the effects of full skirts below a tight fitting bodice is to make 
the waist look smaller -- depends on what you mean by fat, I guess.  

					Catherine

------------------------------

End of Historic Costume Digest V3 #154
**************************************

A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, send the command lines:

    unsubscribe h-costume-digest
    subscribe h-costume
    end

in the body of a message to majordomo@lunch.engr.sgi.com.

Thanks and enjoy the list!
